SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Heikki Handroos

Publications and source records attributed to Heikki Handroos.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mastering Autonomous Assembly in Fusion Application with Learning-by-doing: a Peg-in-hole Study

Robotic peg-in-hole assembly represents a critical area of investigation in robotic automation. The fusion of reinforcement learning (RL) and deep neural networks (DNNs) has yielded remarkable breakthroughs in this field. However, existing RL-based methods grapple with delivering optimal performance under the unique environmental and mission constraints of fusion applications. As a result, we propose an inventively designed RL-based approach. In contrast to alternative methods, our focus centers on enhancing the DNN architecture rather than the RL model. Our strategy receives and integrates data from the RGB camera and force/torque (F/T) sensor, training the agent to execute the peg-in-hole assembly task in a manner akin to human hand-eye coordination. All training and experimentation unfold within a realistic environment, and empirical outcomes demonstrate that this multi-sensor fusion approach excels in rigid peg-in-hole assembly tasks, surpassing the repeatable accuracy of the robotic arm utilized--0.1 mm--in uncertain and unstable conditions.

cs.RO

Review of the State-of-the-art on Bio-signal-based Brain-controlled Vehicles

Brain-controlled vehicle (BCV) is an already established technology usually designed for disabled patients. This review focuses on the most relevant topics on the brain controlling vehicles, especially considering terrestrial BCV (e.g., mobile car, car simulators, real car, graphical and gaming cars) and aerial BCV, also named BCAV (e.g., real quadcopter, drone, fixed wings, graphical helicopter and aircraft) controlled using bio-signals such as electroencephalogram (EEG), electrooculogram and electromyogram. For instance, EEG-based algorithms detect patterns from motor imaginary cortex area of the brain for intention detection, patterns like event related desynchronization/event related synchronization, state visually evoked potentials, P300, and generated local evoked potential patterns. We have identified that the reported best performing approaches employ machine learning and artificial intelligence optimization methods, namely support vector machine, neural network, linear discriminant analysis, k-nearest neighbor, k-means, water drop optimization and chaotic tug of war optimization optimization. We considered the following metrics to analyze the efficiency of the different methods: type and combination of bio-signals, time response, and accuracy values with the statistical analysis. The present work provides an extensive literature review of the key findings of previous ten years, indicating the future perspectives in the field.

eess.SP