arXiv subjects

Hekun Li

Publications and source records attributed to Hekun Li.

21 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2019

Constraining Dark Energy With Stacked Concave Lenses

Low density regions are less affected by the nonlinear structure formation and baryonic physics. They are ideal places for probing the nature of dark energy, a possible explanation for the cosmic acceleration. Unlike void lensing, which requires identifications of individual voids, we study the stacked lensing signals around the low-density-positions (LDP), defined as places that are devoid of foreground bright galaxies in projection. The method allows a direct comparison with numerical results by drawing correspondence between the bright galaxies with halos. It leads to lensing signals that are significant enough for differentiating several dark energy models. In this work, we use the CFHTLenS catalogue to define LDPs, as well as measuring their background lensing signals. We consider several different definitions of the foreground bright galaxies (redshift range \& magnitude cut). Regarding the cosmological model, we run six simulations: the first set of simulations have the same initial conditions, with $\rm{w_{de}=-1,-0.5,-0.8,-1.2}$; the second set of simulations include a slightly different $Λ$CDM model and a w(z) model from \cite{2017NatAs...1..627Z}. The lensing results indicate that the models with $\rm{w_{de}=-0.5,-0.8}$ are not favored, and the other four models all achieve comparable agreement with the data.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2019

Testing Shear Recovery with Field Distortion

The tilt, rotation, or offset of each CCD with respect to the focal plane, as well as the distortion of the focal plane itself, cause shape distortions to the observed objects, an effect typically known as field distortion (FD). We point out that FD provides a unique way of quantifying the accuracy of cosmic shear measurement. The idea is to stack the shear estimators from galaxies that share similar FD-induced shape distortions. Given that the latter can be calculated with parameters from astrometric calibrations, the accuracy of the shear estimator can be directly tested on real images. It provides a way to calibrate the multiplicative and additive shear recovery biases within the scientific data itself, without requiring simulations or any external data sets. We use the CFHTLenS images to demonstrate the accuracy of the Fourier_Quad shear recovery method. We highlight some details in our image processing pipeline, including background removal, source identification and deblending, astrometric calibration, star selection for PSF reconstruction, noise reduction, etc.. We show that in the shear ranges of -0.005 < g_1 < 0.005 and -0.008 < g_2 < 0.008, the multiplicative biases are at the level of < 0.04. Slight additive biases on the order of 5E-4 (6 sigma) are identified for sources provided by the official CFHTLenS catalog (not using its shear catalog), but are minor (4 sigma) for source catalog generated by our Fourier_Quad pipeline.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2017

An accurate centroid algorithm for PSF reconstruction

In this work, we present a novel centroiding method based on Fourier space Phase Fitting(FPF) for Point Spread Function(PSF) reconstruction. We generate two sets of simulations to test our method. The first set is generated by GalSim with elliptical Moffat profile and strong anisotropy which shifts the center of the PSF. The second set of simulation is drawn from CFHT i band stellar imaging data. We find non-negligible anisotropy from CFHT stellar images, which leads to $\sim$0.08 scatter in unit of pixels using polynomial fitting method Vakili and Hogg (2016). And we apply FPF method to estimate the centroid in real space, this scatter reduces to $\sim$0.04 in SNR=200 CFHT like sample. In low SNR (50 and 100) CFHT like samples, the background noise dominates the shifting of the centroid, therefore the scatter estimated from different methods are similar. We compare polynomial fitting and FPF using GalSim simulation with optical anisotropy. We find that in all SNR$\sim$50, 100 and 200) samples, FPF performs better than polynomial fitting by a factor of $\sim$3. In general, we suggest that in real observations there are anisotropy which shift the centroid, and FPF method is a better way to accurately locate it.

astro-ph.IM↗