Hekun Tian | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

GeoLAM: Learning Geometry-Grounded Latent Actions from Unlabeled Human Videos

Human videos provide rich manipulation experience, but extracting action representations that preserve useful motion remains challenging. Visual reconstruction alone can entangle manipulation-related motion with appearance changes and camera movement. We present GeoLAM, a framework for learning geometry-grounded latent actions from action-free human videos. GeoLAM combines future-frame reconstruction through a frozen geometric feature hierarchy with motion supervision from a training-only 4D geometry teacher. The geometric representation provides a structural prior, while the teacher's predictions yield spatially pooled targets capturing 3D displacement, residual image-plane motion, and surface-orientation changes. Visibility and confidence weighting reduces the contribution of unreliable estimates, encouraging continuous latent actions to retain geometric motion without explicit hand-pose or hand-trajectory annotations. After video pretraining without action labels, the learned representation provides transition targets for a world-action model trained on action-labeled robot demonstrations. The model jointly denoises latent actions and executable action chunks, with future-video prediction used only as an auxiliary training task. Deployment therefore requires neither the geometry teacher nor future-video generation. Evaluations on a latent-action benchmark and robotic manipulation tasks demonstrate the strong performance of GeoLAM.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2026

Towards Trustworthy Embodied Intelligence: A Systems Framework and Graded Trustworthiness Levels

Embodied intelligence integrates learned perception and decision making with real-time computation, control, and physical interaction. Because failures can cause immediate physical or operational harm, task completion alone does not establish trustworthiness. We define trustworthy embodied intelligence as the sustained capacity to execute specified tasks reliably under environmental and system variation while maintaining risk within acceptable bounds. We term this objective sustained safe success. Its supporting mechanisms are organized into four interdependent layers. The model layer generates task-competent action proposals with calibrated uncertainty and explicit safety preferences. The system layer realizes authorized actions dependably through integrated sensing, computation, control, hardware safeguards, fault containment, and fallback. The evidence layer substantiates bounded claims through evaluation, verification, validation, traceability, and structured assurance arguments. The deployment layer maintains claim validity through runtime monitoring, authority management, intervention, incident response, and controlled updates. Because assumptions and failures propagate across these layers, neither model capability, isolated safeguards, nor benchmark performance alone can establish end-to-end trustworthiness. Drawing on embodied AI, robotics, control, dependable computing, distributed systems, and autonomous driving, we further propose a non-normative hierarchy of trustworthiness levels. This hierarchy grades the strength of bounded deployment claims across task capability, safety, system assurance, operational governance, and supporting evidence, providing a basis for bounded deployment, comparative evaluation, research prioritization, and future standardization.

cs.RO↗