arXiv subjects

Hengyu Chang

Publications and source records attributed to Hengyu Chang.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

EVADE-Bench: Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating and Enhancing Evasive Content Detection

E-commerce platforms increasingly rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) to detect illicit or misleading product content. However, these models remain vulnerable to evasive content, which refers to inputs that have been deliberately modified through techniques such as word splitting, euphemistic language, or image cropping to conceal policy violations while still conveying prohibited claims. Crucially, detecting such content requires a model to simultaneously master two capabilities: accurately comprehending complex rules, and correctly inferring the true intent behind deliberately obfuscated multimodal inputs. While prior work has separately explored LLM reasoning over complex rules and LLM-based detection of evasive content, no existing benchmark combines both within a unified evaluation framework. This gap is particularly consequential in e-commerce, where accurate moderation demands that both capabilities operate in concert. To address this gap, we introduce EVADE-Bench, the first expert-curated Chinese multimodal benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLMs and VLMs on evasive content detection in real-world e-commerce scenarios. Our comprehensive evaluation of 26 open- and closed-source LLMs and VLMs reveals that even state-of-the-art models frequently misclassify evasive samples. We further demonstrate that clearer rule categorization significantly improves model prediction consistency and reduces false predictions, highlighting the critical role of benchmark design in enabling reliable evaluation. To explore paths for performance improvement, we investigate the feasibility of multi-agent decomposition for multimodal reasoning, wherein visual description and logical inference are decoupled into separate agents, and find that this strategy yields notable accuracy gains.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

RuCL: Stratified Rubric-Based Curriculum Learning for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as a prevailing paradigm for enhancing reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). However, relying solely on outcome supervision risks reward hacking, where models learn spurious reasoning patterns to satisfy final answer checks. While recent rubric-based approaches offer fine-grained supervision signals, they suffer from high computational costs of instance-level generation and inefficient training dynamics caused by treating all rubrics as equally learnable. In this paper, we propose Stratified Rubric-based Curriculum Learning (RuCL), a novel framework that reformulates curriculum learning by shifting the focus from data selection to reward design. RuCL generates generalized rubrics for broad applicability and stratifies them based on the model's competence. By dynamically adjusting rubric weights during training, RuCL guides the model from mastering foundational perception to tackling advanced logical reasoning. Extensive experiments on various visual reasoning benchmarks show that RuCL yields a remarkable +7.83% average improvement over the Qwen2.5-VL-7B model, achieving a state-of-the-art accuracy of 60.06%.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Structuring Reasoning for Complex Rules Beyond Flat Representations

Large language models (LLMs) face significant challenges when processing complex rule systems, as they typically treat interdependent rules as unstructured textual data rather than as logically organized frameworks. This limitation results in reasoning divergence, where models often overlook critical rule dependencies essential for accurate interpretation. Although existing approaches such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning have shown promise, they lack systematic methodologies for structured rule processing and are particularly susceptible to error propagation through sequential reasoning chains. To address these limitations, we propose the Dynamic Adjudication Template (DAT), a novel framework inspired by expert human reasoning processes. DAT structures the inference mechanism into three methodical stages: qualitative analysis, evidence gathering, and adjudication. During the qualitative analysis phase, the model comprehensively evaluates the contextual landscape. The subsequent evidence gathering phase involves the targeted extraction of pertinent information based on predefined template elements ([placeholder]), followed by systematic verification against applicable rules. Finally, in the adjudication phase, the model synthesizes these validated components to formulate a comprehensive judgment. Empirical results demonstrate that DAT consistently outperforms conventional CoT approaches in complex rule-based tasks. Notably, DAT enables smaller language models to match, and in some cases exceed, the performance of significantly larger LLMs, highlighting its efficiency and effectiveness in managing intricate rule systems.

cs.AI↗