arXiv subjects

Henning Fernau

Publications and source records attributed to Henning Fernau.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2023

Perfect Roman Domination and Unique Response Roman Domination

The idea of enumeration algorithms with polynomial delay is to polynomially bound the running time between any two subsequent solutions output by the enumeration algorithm. While it is open for more than four decades if all minimal dominating sets of a graph can be enumerated in output-polynomial time, it has recently been proven that pointwise-minimal Roman dominating functions can be enumerated even with polynomial delay. The idea of the enumeration algorithm was to use polynomial-time solvable extension problems. We use this as a motivation to prove that also two variants of Roman dominating functions studied in the literature, named perfect and unique response, can be enumerated with polynomial delay. This is interesting since Extension Perfect Roman Domination is W[1]-complete if parameterized by the weight of the given function and even W[2]-complete if parameterized by the number vertices assigned 0 in the pre-solution, as we prove. Otherwise, efficient solvability of extension problems and enumerability with polynomial delay tend to go hand-in-hand. We achieve our enumeration result by constructing a bijection to Roman dominating functions, where the corresponding extension problem is polynomimaltime solvable. Furthermore, we show that Unique Response Roman Domination is solvable in polynomial time on split graphs, while Perfect Roman Domination is NP-complete on this graph class, which proves that both variations, albeit coming with a very similar definition, do differ in some complexity aspects. This way, we also solve an open problem from the literature.

cs.DM↗

arXiv2023

When Stars Control a Grammar's Work

Graph-controlled insertion-deletion (GCID) systems are regulated extensions of insertion-deletion systems. Such a system has several components and each component contains some insertion-deletion rules. The components are the vertices of a directed control graph. A rule is applied to a string in a component and the resultant string is moved to the target component specified in the rule. The language of the system is the set of all terminal strings collected in the final component. We impose the restriction in the structure of the underlying graph to be a star structure where there is a central, control component which acts like a master and transmits a string (after applying one of its rules) to one of the components specified in the (applied) rule. A component which receives the string can process the obtained string with any applicable rule available in it and sends back the resultant string only to the center component. With this restriction, we obtain computational completeness for some descriptional complexity measures

cs.FL↗

arXiv2023

Hitting the Romans

Roman domination is one of few examples where the related extension problem is polynomial-time solvable even if the original decision problem is NP-complete. This is interesting, as it allows to establish polynomial-delay enumeration algorithms for finding minimal Roman dominating functions, while it is open for more than four decades if all minimal dominating sets of a graph or if all hitting sets of a hypergraph can be enumerated with polynomial delay. To find the reason why this is the case, we combine the idea of hitting set with the idea of Roman domination. We hence obtain and study two new problems, called Roman Hitting Function and Roman Hitting Set, both generalizing Roman Domination. This allows us to delineate the borderline of polynomial-delay enumerability. Here, we assume what we call the Hitting Set Transversal Thesis, claiming that it is impossible to enumerate all minimal hitting sets of a hypergraph with polynomial delay. Our first focus is on the extension versions of these problems. While doing this, we find some conditions under which the Extension Roman Hitting Function problem is NP-complete. We then use parameterized complexity to get a better understanding of why Extension Roman Hitting Function behaves in this way. Furthermore, we analyze the parameterized and approximation complexity of the underlying optimization problems. We also discuss consequences for Roman variants of other problems like Vertex Cover.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2023

Sum Labelling Graphs of Maximum Degree Two

The concept of sum labelling was introduced in 1990 by Harary. A graph is a sum graph if its vertices can be labelled by distinct positive integers in such a way that two vertices are connected by an edge if and only if the sum of their labels is the label of another vertex in the graph. It is easy to see that every sum graph has at least one isolated vertex, and every graph can be made a sum graph by adding at most $n^2$ isolated vertices to it. The minimum number of isolated vertices that need to be added to a graph to make it a sum graph is called the sum number of the graph. The sum number of several prominent graph classes (e.g., cycles, trees, complete graphs) is already well known. We examine the effect of taking the disjoint union of graphs on the sum number. In particular, we provide a complete characterization of the sum number of graphs of maximum degree two, since every such graph is the disjoint union of paths and cycles.

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete

A graph $G$ is well-covered if every minimal vertex cover of $G$ is minimum, and a graph $G$ is well-dominated if every minimal dominating set of $G$ is minimum. Studies on well-covered graphs were initiated in [Plummer, JCT 1970], and well-dominated graphs were first introduced in [Finbow, Hartnell and Nowakow, AC 1988]. Well-dominated graphs are well-covered, and both classes have been widely studied in the literature. The recognition of well-covered graphs was proved coNP-complete by [Chvátal and Slater, AODM 1993] and by [Sankaranarayana and Stewart, Networks 1992], but the complexity of recognizing well-dominated graphs has been left open since their introduction. We close this complexity gap by proving that recognizing well-dominated graphs is coNP-complete. This solves a well-known open question (c.f. [Levit and Tankus, DM 2017] and [Gözüpek, Hujdurovic and Milanič, DMTCS 2017]), which was first asked in [Caro, Sebő and Tarsi, JAlg 1996]. Surprisingly, our proof is quite simple, although it was a long-standing open problem. Finally, we show that recognizing well-totally-dominated graphs is coNP-complete, answering a question of [Bahad\ir, Ekim, and Gözüpek, AMC 2021].

math.CO↗

arXiv2022

Roman Census: Enumerating and Counting Roman Dominating Functions on Graph Classes

The concept of Roman domination has recently been studied concerning enumerating and counting (WG 2022). It has been shown that minimal Roman dominating functions can be enumerated with polynomial delay, contrasting what is known about minimal dominating sets. The running time of the algorithm could be estimated as $\mathcal{O}(1.9332^n)$ on general graphs of order $n$. In this paper, we focus on special graph classes. More specifically, for chordal graphs, we present an enumeration algorithm running in time $\mathcal{O}(1.8940^n)$. For interval graphs, we can lower this time further to $\mathcal{O}(1.7321^n)$. Interestingly, this also matches (exactly) the known lower bound. We can also provide a matching lower and upper bound for forests, which is (incidentally) the same, namely $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{3}^n)$. Furthermore, we show an enumeration algorithm running in time $\mathcal{O}(1.4656^n)$ for split graphs and for cobipartite graphs. Our approach also allows to give concrete formulas for counting minimal Roman dominating functions on special graph families like paths.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

All Paths Lead to Rome

All roads lead to Rome is the core idea of the puzzle game Roma. It is played on an $n \times n$ grid consisting of quadratic cells. Those cells are grouped into boxes of at most four neighboring cells and are either filled, or to be filled, with arrows pointing in cardinal directions. The goal of the game is to fill the empty cells with arrows such that each box contains at most one arrow of each direction and regardless where we start, if we follow the arrows in the cells, we will always end up in the special Roma-cell. In this work, we study the computational complexity of the puzzle game Roma and show that completing a Roma board according to the rules is an \NP-complete task, counting the number of valid completions is #Ptime-complete, and determining the number of preset arrows needed to make the instance \emph{uniquely} solvable is $Σ_2^P$-complete. We further show that the problem of completing a given Roma instance on an $n\times n$ board cannot be solved in time $\mathcal{O}\left(2^{{o}(n)}\right)$ under ETH and give a matching dynamic programming algorithm based on the idea of Catalan structures.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Unlabeled Multi-Robot Motion Planning with Tighter Separation Bounds

We consider the unlabeled motion-planning problem of $m$ unit-disc robots moving in a simple polygonal workspace of $n$ edges. The goal is to find a motion plan that moves the robots to a given set of $m$ target positions. For the unlabeled variant, it does not matter which robot reaches which target position as long as all target positions are occupied in the end. If the workspace has narrow passages such that the robots cannot fit through them, then the free configuration space, representing all possible unobstructed positions of the robots, will consist of multiple connected components. Even if in each component of the free space the number of targets matches the number of start positions, the motion-planning problem does not always have a solution when the robots and their targets are positioned very densely. In this paper, we prove tight bounds on how much separation between start and target positions is necessary to always guarantee a solution. Moreover, we describe an algorithm that always finds a solution in time $O(n \log n + mn + m^2)$ if the separation bounds are met. Specifically, we prove that the following separation is sufficient: any two start positions are at least distance $4$ apart, any two target positions are at least distance $4$ apart, and any pair of a start and a target positions is at least distance $3$ apart. We further show that when the free space consists of a single connected component, the separation between start and target positions is not necessary.

cs.CG↗

arXiv2022

Enumerating Connected Dominating Sets

The question to enumerate all inclusion-minimal connected dominating sets in a graph of order $n$ in time significantly less than $2^n$ is an open question that was asked in many places. We answer this question affirmatively, by providing an enumeration algorithm that runs in time $\mathcal{O}(1.9896^n)$, using polynomial space only. The key to this result is the consideration of this enumeration problem on 2-degenerate graphs, which is proven to be possible in time $\mathcal{O}(1.9767^n)$. We also show new lower bound results by constructing a family of graphs of order $n$ with $Ω(1.4890^n)$ minimal connected dominating sets, while previous examples achieved $Ω(1.4422^n)$. Our construction results in lower bounds for a few special graph classes. We also address essential questions concerning output-sensitive enumeration. Namely, we give reasons why our algorithm cannot be turned into an enumeration algorithm that guarantees polynomial delay without much efforts. More precisely, we prove that it is NP-complete to decide, given a graph $G$ and a vertex set $U$, if there exists a minimal connected dominating set $D$ with $U\subseteq D$, even if $G$ is known to be 2-degenerate. Our reduction also shows that even any subexponential delay is not easy to achieve for enumerating minimal connected dominating sets. Another reduction shows that no FPT-algorithms can be expected for this extension problem concerning minimal connected dominating sets, parameterized by $|U|$. We also relate our enumeration problem to the famous open Hitting Set Transversal problem, which can be phrased in our context as the question to enumerate all minimal dominating sets of a graph with polynomial delay by showing that a polynomial-delay enumeration algorithm for minimal connected dominating sets implies an affirmative algorithmic solution to the Hitting Set Transversal problem.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2022

Minimal Roman Dominating Functions: Extensions and Enumeration

Roman domination is one of the many variants of domination that keeps most of the complexity features of the classical domination problem. We prove that Roman domination behaves differently in two aspects: enumeration and extension. We develop non-trivial enumeration algorithms for minimal Roman domination functions with polynomial delay and polynomial space. Recall that the existence of a similar enumeration result for minimal dominating sets is open for decades. Our result is based on a polynomial-time algorithm for Extension Roman Domination: Given a graph $G = (V,E)$ and a function $f:V\to\{0,1,2\}$, is there a minimal Roman domination function $\Tilde{f}$ with $f\leq \Tilde{f}$? Here, $\leq$ lifts $0< 1< 2$ pointwise; minimality is understood in this order. Our enumeration algorithm is also analyzed from an input-sensitive viewpoint, leading to a run-time estimate of $\Oh(\RomanUpperbound^n)$ for graphs of order n; this is complemented by a lower bound example of $Ω(\RomanLowerbound^n)$.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

The Space Complexity of Sum Labelling

A graph is called a sum graph if its vertices can be labelled by distinct positive integers such that there is an edge between two vertices if and only if the sum of their labels is the label of another vertex of the graph. Most papers on sum graphs consider combinatorial questions like the minimum number of isolated vertices that need to be added to a given graph to make it a sum graph. In this paper, we initiate the study of sum graphs from the viewpoint of computational complexity. Notice that every $n$-vertex sum graph can be represented by a sorted list of $n$ positive integers where edge queries can be answered in $O(\log n)$ time. Therefore, limiting the size of the vertex labels also upper-bounds the space complexity of storing the graph in the database. We show that every $n$-vertex, $m$-edge, $d$-degenerate graph can be made a sum graph by adding at most $m$ isolated vertices to it, such that the size of each vertex label is at most $O(n^2d)$. This enables us to store the graph using $O(m\log n)$ bits of memory. For sparse graphs (graphs with $O(n)$ edges), this matches the trivial lower bound of $Ω(n\log n)$. Since planar graphs and forests have constant degeneracy, our result implies an upper bound of $O(n^2)$ on their label size. The previously best known upper bound on the label size of general graphs with the minimum number of isolated vertices was $O(4^n)$, due to Kratochvíl, Miller & Nguyen. Furthermore, their proof was existential, whereas our labelling can be constructed in polynomial time.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2021

Properties of Graphs Specified by a Regular Language

Traditionally, graph algorithms get a single graph as input, and then they should decide if this graph satisfies a certain property $Φ$. What happens if this question is modified in a way that we get a possibly infinite family of graphs as an input, and the question is if there is a graph satisfying $Φ$ in the family? We approach this question by using formal languages for specifying families of graphs, in particular by regular sets of words. We show that certain graph properties can be decided by studying the syntactic monoid of the specification language $L$ if a certain torsion condition is satisfied. This condition holds trivially if $L$ is regular. More specifically, we use a natural binary encoding of finite graphs over a binary alphabet $Σ$, and we define a regular set $\mathbb{G}\subseteq Σ^*$ such that every nonempty word $w\in \mathbb{G}$ defines a finite and nonempty graph. Also, graph properties can then be syntactically defined as languages over $Σ$. Then, we ask whether the automaton $\mathcal{A}$ specifies some graph satisfying a certain property~$Φ$. Our structural results show that we can answer this question for all "typical" graph properties. In order to show our results, we split $L$ into a finite union of subsets and every subset of this union defines in a natural way a single finite graph $F$ where some edges and vertices are marked. The marked graph in turn defines an infinite graph $F^\infty$ and therefore the family of finite subgraphs of $F^\infty$ where $F$ appears as an induced subgraph. This yields a geometric description of all graphs specified by $L$ based on splitting $L$ into finitely many pieces; then using the notion of graph retraction, we obtain an easily understandable description of the graphs in each piece.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2021

On the Complexity of Intersection Non-emptiness for Star-Free Language Classes

In the Intersection Non-Emptiness problem, we are given a list of finite automata $A_1,A_2,\dots,A_m$ over a common alphabet $Σ$ as input, and the goal is to determine whether some string $w\in Σ^*$ lies in the intersection of the languages accepted by the automata in the list. We analyze the complexity of the Intersection Non-Emptiness problem under the promise that all input automata accept a language in some level of the dot-depth hierarchy, or some level of the Straubing-Thérien hierarchy. Automata accepting languages from the lowest levels of these hierarchies arise naturally in the context of model checking. We identify a dichotomy in the dot-depth hierarchy by showing that the problem is already NP-complete when all input automata accept languages of the levels zero or one half and already PSPACE-hard when all automata accept a language from the level one. Conversely, we identify a tetrachotomy in the Straubing-Thérien hierarchy. More precisely, we show that the problem is in AC$^0$ when restricted to level zero; complete for LOGSPACE or NLOGSPACE, depending on the input representation, when restricted to languages in the level one half; NP-complete when the input is given as DFAs accepting a language in from level one or three half; and finally, PSPACE-complete when the input automata accept languages in level two or higher. Moreover, we show that the proof technique used to show containment in NP for DFAs accepting languages in the Straubing-Thérien hierarchy levels one ore three half does not generalize to the context of NFAs. To prove this, we identify a family of languages that provide an exponential separation between the state complexity of general NFAs and that of partially ordered NFAs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first superpolynomial separation between these two models of computation.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2021

Finite Automata Intersection Non-Emptiness: Parameterized Complexity Revisited

The problem DFA-Intersection-Nonemptiness asks if a given number of deterministic automata accept a common word. In general, this problem is PSPACE-complete. Here, we investigate this problem for the subclasses of commutative automata and automata recognizing sparse languages. We show that in both cases DFA-Intersection-Nonemptiness is complete for NP and for the parameterized class $W[1]$, where the number of input automata is the parameter, when the alphabet is fixed. Additionally, we establish the same result for Tables Non-Empty Join, a problem that asks if the join of several tables (possibly containing null values) in a database is non-empty. Lastly, we show that Bounded NFA-Intersection-Nonemptiness, parameterized by the length bound, is $\mbox{co-}W[2]$-hard with a variable input alphabet and for nondeterministic automata recognizing finite strictly bounded languages, yielding a variant leaving the realm of $W[1]$.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2021

Diversity in Kemeny Rank Aggregation: A Parameterized Approach

In its most traditional setting, the main concern of optimization theory is the search for optimal solutions for instances of a given computational problem. A recent trend of research in artificial intelligence, called solution diversity, has focused on the development of notions of optimality that may be more appropriate in settings where subjectivity is essential. The idea is that instead of aiming at the development of algorithms that output a single optimal solution, the goal is to investigate algorithms that output a small set of sufficiently good solutions that are sufficiently diverse from one another. In this way, the user has the opportunity to choose the solution that is most appropriate to the context at hand. It also displays the richness of the solution space. When combined with techniques from parameterized complexity theory, the paradigm of diversity of solutions offers a powerful algorithmic framework to address problems of practical relevance. In this work, we investigate the impact of this combination in the field of Kemeny Rank Aggregation, a well-studied class of problems lying in the intersection of order theory and social choice theory and also in the field of order theory itself. In particular, we show that the Kemeny Rank Aggregation problem is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to natural parameters providing natural formalizations of the notions of diversity and of the notion of a sufficiently good solution. Our main results work both when considering the traditional setting of aggregation over linearly ordered votes, and in the more general setting where votes are partially ordered.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2020

Synchronizing Deterministic Push-Down Automata Can Be Really Hard

The question if a deterministic finite automaton admits a software reset in the form of a so-called synchronizing word can be answered in polynomial time. In this paper, we extend this algorithmic question to deterministic automata beyond finite automata. We prove that the question of synchronizability becomes undecidable even when looking at deterministic one-counter automata. This is also true for another classical mild extension of regularity, namely that of deterministic one-turn push-down automata. However, when we combine both restrictions, we arrive at scenarios with a PSPACE-complete (and hence decidable) synchronizability problem. Likewise, we arrive at a decidable synchronizability problem for (partially) blind deterministic counter automata. There are several interpretations of what synchronizability should mean for deterministic push-down automata. This is depending on the role of the stack: should it be empty on synchronization, should it be always the same or is it arbitrary? For the automata classes studied in this paper, the complexity or decidability status of the synchronizability problem is mostly independent of this technicality, but we also discuss one class of automata where this makes a difference.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2020

Synchronization of Deterministic Visibly Push-Down Automata

We generalize the concept of synchronizing words for finite automata, which map all states of the automata to the same state, to deterministic visibly push-down automata. Here, a synchronizing word w does not only map all states to the same state but also fulfills some conditions on the stack content of each run after reading w. We consider three types of these stack constraints: after reading w, the stack (1) is empty in each run, (2) contains the same sequence of stack symbols in each run, or (3) contains an arbitrary sequence which is independent of the other runs. We show that in contrast to general deterministic push-down automata, it is decidable for deterministic visibly push-down automata whether there exists a synchronizing word with each of these stack constraints, i.e., the problems are in EXPTIME. Under the constraint (1) the problem is even in P. For the sub-classes of deterministic very visibly push-down automata the problem is in P for all three types of constraints. We further study variants of the synchronization problem where the number of turns in the stack height behavior caused by a synchronizing word is restricted, as well as the problem of synchronizing a variant of a sequential transducer, which shows some visibly behavior, by a word that synchronizes the states and produces the same output on all runs.

cs.FL↗

arXiv2020

Regular Intersection Emptiness of Graph Problems: Finding a Needle in a Haystack of Graphs with the Help of Automata

The Int_reg-problem of a combinatorial problem P asks, given a nondeterministic automaton M as input, whether the language L(M) accepted by M contains any positive instance of the problem P. We consider the Int_reg-problem for a number of different graph problems and give general criteria that give decision procedures for these Int_reg-problems. To achieve this goal, we consider a natural graph encoding so that the language of all graph encodings is regular. Then, we draw the connection between classical pumping- and interchange-arguments from the field of formal language theory with the graph operations induced on the encoded graph. Our techniques apply among others to the Int_reg-problem of well-known graph problems like Vertex Cover and Independent Set, as well as to subgraph problems, graph-edit problems and graph-partitioning problems, including coloring problems.

cs.FL↗