arXiv subjects

Hila Safi

Publications and source records attributed to Hila Safi.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Reality Check on Quantum Optimisation: Evidence from an Industrial Case Study

Quantum Processing Units promise speed-ups for selected computational problems, including combinatorial optimisation, but their industrial utility remains an open challenge. We study an industrial variant of the Job-Shop Scheduling Problem using quantum, quantum-inspired, and classical methods across three platforms: IBM Quantum, the D-Wave Quantum Annealer, and the Fujitsu Digital Annealer. By tailoring formulations to hardware-specific constraints, we show that hardware-software co-design is essential for solution quality and scalability. We benchmark all approaches against an exact classical solver and a MILP formulation, evaluating runtime, solution quality, and scalability. Our results indicate that quantum and quantum-inspired optimisation can support industrial solver selection, integration in classical workflows, modelling decisions, and early proof-of-concept development, while suggesting a potential path towards improved approximations for industrial scheduling.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2025

Stacking the Odds: Full-Stack Quantum System Design Space Exploration

Design space exploration (DSE) plays an important role in optimising quantum circuit execution by systematically evaluating different configurations of compilation strategies and hardware settings. In this work, we study the impact of layout methods, qubit routing techniques, compiler optimization levels, and hardware-specific properties, including noise characteristics, topological structures, connectivity densities, and device sizes. By traversing these dimensions, we aim to understand how compilation choices interact with hardware features. A central question in our study is whether carefully selected device parameters and mapping strategies, including initial layouts and routing heuristics, can mitigate hardware-induced errors beyond standard error mitigation methods. Our results show that choosing the right software strategies (e.g., layout and routing) and tailoring hardware properties (e.g., reducing noise or leveraging connectivity) significantly enhances the fidelity of quantum circuit executions. We provide performance estimates using metrics such as circuit depth, gate count, and expected fidelity. These findings highlight the value of hardware-software co-design, especially as quantum systems scale and move toward error-corrected computing. Our simulations, though noisy, include quantum error correction (QEC) scenarios, revealing similar sensitivities to layout and connectivity. This suggests that co-design principles will be vital for integrating QEC in future devices. Overall, we offer practical guidance for co-optimizing mapping, routing, and hardware configuration in real-world quantum computing.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2024

Approximating under the Influence of Quantum Noise and Compute Power

The quantum approximate optimisation algorithm (QAOA) is at the core of many scenarios that aim to combine the power of quantum computers and classical high-performance computing appliances for combinatorial optimisation. Several obstacles challenge concrete benefits now and in the foreseeable future: Imperfections quickly degrade algorithmic performance below practical utility; overheads arising from alternating between classical and quantum primitives can counter any advantage; and the choice of parameters or algorithmic variant can substantially influence runtime and result quality. Selecting the optimal combination is a non-trivial issue, as it not only depends on user requirements, but also on details of the hardware and software stack. Appropriate automation can lift the burden of choosing optimal combinations for end-users: They should not be required to understand technicalities like differences between QAOA variants, required number of QAOA layers, or necessary measurement samples. Yet, they should receive best-possible satisfaction of their non-functional requirements, be it performance or other. We determine factors that affect solution quality and temporal behaviour of four QAOA variants using comprehensive density-matrix-based simulations targeting three widely studied optimisation problems. Our simulations consider ideal quantum computation, and a continuum of scenarios troubled by realistic imperfections. Our quantitative results, accompanied by a comprehensive reproduction package, show strong differences between QAOA variants that can be pinpointed to narrow and specific effects. We identify influential co-variables and relevant non-functional quality goals that, we argue, mark the relevant ingredients for designing appropriate software engineering abstraction mechanisms and automated tool-chains for devising quantum solutions from high-level problem specifications.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Quantum Computing Techniques for Multi-Knapsack Problems

Optimization problems are ubiquitous in various industrial settings, and multi-knapsack optimization is one recurrent task faced daily by several industries. The advent of quantum computing has opened a new paradigm for computationally intensive tasks, with promises of delivering better and faster solutions for specific classes of problems. This work presents a comprehensive study of quantum computing approaches for multi-knapsack problems, by investigating some of the most prominent and state-of-the-art quantum algorithms using different quantum software and hardware tools. The performance of the quantum approaches is compared for varying hyperparameters. We consider several gate-based quantum algorithms, such as QAOA and VQE, as well as quantum annealing, and present an exhaustive study of the solutions and the estimation of runtimes. Additionally, we analyze the impact of warm-starting QAOA to understand the reasons for the better performance of this approach. We discuss the implications of our results in view of utilizing quantum optimization for industrial applications in the future. In addition to the high demand for better quantum hardware, our results also emphasize the necessity of more and better quantum optimization algorithms, especially for multi-knapsack problems.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

Influence of HW-SW-Co-Design on Quantum Computing Scalability

The use of quantum processing units (QPUs) promises speed-ups for solving computational problems. Yet, current devices are limited by the number of qubits and suffer from significant imperfections, which prevents achieving quantum advantage. To step towards practical utility, one approach is to apply hardware-software co-design methods. This can involve tailoring problem formulations and algorithms to the quantum execution environment, but also entails the possibility of adapting physical properties of the QPU to specific applications. In this work, we follow the latter path, and investigate how key figures - circuit depth and gate count - required to solve four cornerstone NP-complete problems vary with tailored hardware properties. Our results reveal that achieving near-optimal performance and properties does not necessarily require optimal quantum hardware, but can be satisfied with much simpler structures that can potentially be realised for many hardware approaches. Using statistical analysis techniques, we additionally identify an underlying general model that applies to all subject problems. This suggests that our results may be universally applicable to other algorithms and problem domains, and tailored QPUs can find utility outside their initially envisaged problem domains. The substantial possible improvements nonetheless highlight the importance of QPU tailoring to progress towards practical deployment and scalability of quantum software.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

QPU-System Co-Design for Quantum HPC Accelerators

The use of quantum processing units (QPUs) promises speed-ups for solving computational problems, but the quantum devices currently available possess only a very limited number of qubits and suffer from considerable imperfections. One possibility to progress towards practical utility is to use a co-design approach: Problem formulation and algorithm, but also the physical QPU properties are tailored to the specific application. Since QPUs will likely be used as accelerators for classical computers, details of systemic integration into existing architectures are another lever to influence and improve the practical utility of QPUs. In this work, we investigate the influence of different parameters on the runtime of quantum programs on tailored hybrid CPU-QPU-systems. We study the influence of communication times between CPU and QPU, how adapting QPU designs influences quantum and overall execution performance, and how these factors interact. Using a simple model that allows for estimating which design choices should be subjected to optimisation for a given task, we provide an intuition to the HPC community on potentials and limitations of co-design approaches. We also discuss physical limitations for implementing the proposed changes on real quantum hardware devices.

cs.AR↗

arXiv2020

Insights on Training Neural Networks for QUBO Tasks

Current hardware limitations restrict the potential when solving quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems via the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) or quantum annealing (QA). Thus, we consider training neural networks in this context. We first discuss QUBO problems that originate from translated instances of the traveling salesman problem (TSP): Analyzing this representation via autoencoders shows that there is way more information included than necessary to solve the original TSP. Then we show that neural networks can be used to solve TSP instances from both QUBO input and autoencoders' hiddenstate representation. We finally generalize the approach and successfully train neural networks to solve arbitrary QUBO problems, sketching means to use neuromorphic hardware as a simulator or an additional co-processor for quantum computing.

quant-ph↗