Hiu Tung Wong | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

RegulAR: Graph-Grounded Error Recognition and Assistance for Procedural Tasks in AR

Errors are inevitable in procedural tasks, yet most AR guidance systems focus on step-by-step instruction delivery rather than helping users recognize and recover from mistakes. We present RegulAR, an AR task assistant for procedural error recognition and recovery. RegulAR models task instructions as a hierarchical dependency graph and combines this structure with a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to interpret egocentric observations during execution. This enables RegulAR to track progress, identify deviations by error type, estimate their impact on later steps, and deliver appropriately salient interventions through an in-situ head-up display that visualizes task state and recovery guidance. By making procedural structure explicit, RegulAR supports not only next-step guidance, but also reasoning about what went wrong, why it matters, and how users can get back on track. In a within-subject study (N=12), participants reported better task-structure understanding and recovery support with RegulAR than the MLLM-only baseline.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2026

ImagenWorld: Stress-Testing Image Generation Models with Explainable Human Evaluation on Open-ended Real-World Tasks

Advances in diffusion, autoregressive, and hybrid models have enabled high-quality image synthesis for tasks such as text-to-image, editing, and reference-guided composition. Yet, existing benchmarks remain limited, either focus on isolated tasks, cover only narrow domains, or provide opaque scores without explaining failure modes. We introduce \textbf{ImagenWorld}, a benchmark of 3.6K condition sets spanning six core tasks (generation and editing, with single or multiple references) and six topical domains (artworks, photorealistic images, information graphics, textual graphics, computer graphics, and screenshots). The benchmark is supported by 20K fine-grained human annotations and an explainable evaluation schema that tags localized object-level and segment-level errors, complementing automated VLM-based metrics. Our large-scale evaluation of 14 models yields several insights: (1) models typically struggle more in editing tasks than in generation tasks, especially in local edits. (2) models excel in artistic and photorealistic settings but struggle with symbolic and text-heavy domains such as screenshots and information graphics. (3) closed-source systems lead overall, while targeted data curation (e.g., Qwen-Image) narrows the gap in text-heavy cases. (4) modern VLM-based metrics achieve Kendall accuracies up to 0.79, approximating human ranking, but fall short of fine-grained, explainable error attribution. ImagenWorld provides both a rigorous benchmark and a diagnostic tool to advance robust image generation.

cs.GR↗