Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hojjat Azimi Asrari

Publications and source records attributed to Hojjat Azimi Asrari.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Characterizing higher-order representations through generative diffusion models explains human decoded neurofeedback performance

Brains construct not only "first-order" representations of the environment but also "higher-order" representations about those representations -- including higher-order uncertainty estimates that guide learning and adaptive behavior. Higher-order expectations about representational uncertainty -- i.e., learned through experience -- may play a key role in guiding behavior and learning, but their characterization remains empirically and theoretically challenging. Here, we introduce the Noise Estimation through Reinforcement-based Diffusion (NERD) model, a novel computational framework that trains denoising diffusion models via reinforcement learning to infer distributions of noise in functional MRI data from a decoded neurofeedback task, where healthy human participants learn to achieve target neural states. We hypothesize that participants accomplish this task by learning about and then minimizing their own representational uncertainty. We test this hypothesis with NERD, which mirrors brain-like unsupervised learning. Our results show that NERD outperforms backpropagation-trained control models in capturing human performance with explanatory power enhanced by clustering learned noise distributions. Importantly, our results also reveal individual differences in expected-uncertainty representations that predict task success, demonstrating NERD's utility as a powerful tool for probing higher-order neural representations.

cs.LG↗

How brains build higher order representations of uncertainty

Higher-order representations (HORs) are neural or computational states that are "about" first-order representations (FORs), encoding information not about the external world per se but about the agent's own representational processes -- such as the reliability, source, or structure of a FOR. These HORs appear critical to metacognition, learning, and even consciousness by some accounts, yet their dimensionality, construction, and neural substrates remain poorly understood. Here, we propose that metacognitive estimates of uncertainty or noise reflect a read-out of "posterior-like" HORs from a Bayesian perspective. We then discuss how these posterior-like HORs reflect a combination of "likelihood-like" estimates of current FOR uncertainty and "prior-like" learned distributions over expected FOR uncertainty, and how various emerging engineering and theory-based analytical approaches may be employed to examine the estimation processes and neural correlates associated with these highly under-explored components of our experienced uncertainty.

q-bio.NC↗