arXiv subjects

Holger Dell

Publications and source records attributed to Holger Dell.

25 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2017

Homomorphisms Are a Good Basis for Counting Small Subgraphs

We introduce graph motif parameters, a class of graph parameters that depend only on the frequencies of constant-size induced subgraphs. Classical works by Lovász show that many interesting quantities have this form, including, for fixed graphs $H$, the number of $H$-copies (induced or not) in an input graph $G$, and the number of homomorphisms from $H$ to $G$. Using the framework of graph motif parameters, we obtain faster algorithms for counting subgraph copies of fixed graphs $H$ in host graphs $G$: For graphs $H$ on $k$ edges, we show how to count subgraph copies of $H$ in time $k^{O(k)}\cdot n^{0.174k + o(k)}$ by a surprisingly simple algorithm. This improves upon previously known running times, such as $O(n^{0.91k + c})$ time for $k$-edge matchings or $O(n^{0.46k + c})$ time for $k$-cycles. Furthermore, we prove a general complexity dichotomy for evaluating graph motif parameters: Given a class $\mathcal C$ of such parameters, we consider the problem of evaluating $f\in \mathcal C$ on input graphs $G$, parameterized by the number of induced subgraphs that $f$ depends upon. For every recursively enumerable class $\mathcal C$, we prove the above problem to be either FPT or #W[1]-hard, with an explicit dichotomy criterion. This allows us to recover known dichotomies for counting subgraphs, induced subgraphs, and homomorphisms in a uniform and simplified way, together with improved lower bounds. Finally, we extend graph motif parameters to colored subgraphs and prove a complexity trichotomy: For vertex-colored graphs $H$ and $G$, where $H$ is from a fixed class $\mathcal H$, we want to count color-preserving $H$-copies in $G$. We show that this problem is either polynomial-time solvable or FPT or #W[1]-hard, and that the FPT cases indeed need FPT time under reasonable assumptions.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2017

Finding Detours is Fixed-parameter Tractable

We consider the following natural "above guarantee" parameterization of the classical Longest Path problem: For given vertices s and t of a graph G, and an integer k, the problem Longest Detour asks for an (s,t)-path in G that is at least k longer than a shortest (s,t)-path. Using insights into structural graph theory, we prove that Longest Detour is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) on undirected graphs and actually even admits a single-exponential algorithm, that is, one of running time exp(O(k)) poly(n). This matches (up to the base of the exponential) the best algorithms for finding a path of length at least k. Furthermore, we study the related problem Exact Detour that asks whether a graph G contains an (s,t)-path that is exactly k longer than a shortest (s,t)-path. For this problem, we obtain a randomized algorithm with running time about 2.746^k, and a deterministic algorithm with running time about 6.745^k, showing that this problem is FPT as well. Our algorithms for Exact Detour apply to both undirected and directed graphs.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2017

Complexity and Approximability of Parameterized MAX-CSPs

We study the optimization version of constraint satisfaction problems (Max-CSPs) in the framework of parameterized complexity; the goal is to compute the maximum fraction of constraints that can be satisfied simultaneously. In standard CSPs, we want to decide whether this fraction equals one. The parameters we investigate are structural measures, such as the treewidth or the clique-width of the variable-constraint incidence graph of the CSP instance. We consider Max-CSPs with the constraint types AND, OR, PARITY, and MAJORITY, and with various parameters k, and we attempt to fully classify them into the following three cases: 1. The exact optimum can be computed in FPT time. 2. It is W[1]-hard to compute the exact optimum, but there is a randomized FPT approximation scheme (FPTAS), which computes a $(1-ε)$-approximation in time $f(k,ε)\cdot poly(n)$. 3. There is no FPTAS unless FPT=W[1]. For the corresponding standard CSPs, we establish FPT vs. W[1]-hardness results.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2016

Fine-grained dichotomies for the Tutte plane and Boolean #CSP

Jaeger, Vertigan, and Welsh [15] proved a dichotomy for the complexity of evaluating the Tutte polynomial at fixed points: The evaluation is #P-hard almost everywhere, and the remaining points admit polynomial-time algorithms. Dell, Husfeldt, and Wahlén [9] and Husfeldt and Taslaman [12], in combination with Curticapean [7], extended the #P-hardness results to tight lower bounds under the counting exponential time hypothesis #ETH, with the exception of the line $y=1$, which was left open. We complete the dichotomy theorem for the Tutte polynomial under #ETH by proving that the number of all acyclic subgraphs of a given $n$-vertex graph cannot be determined in time $exp(o(n))$ unless #ETH fails. Another dichotomy theorem we strengthen is the one of Creignou and Hermann [6] for counting the number of satisfying assignments to a constraint satisfaction problem instance over the Boolean domain. We prove that all #P-hard cases are also hard under #ETH. The main ingredient is to prove that the number of independent sets in bipartite graphs with $n$ vertices cannot be computed in time $exp(o(n))$ unless #ETH fails. In order to prove our results, we use the block interpolation idea by Curticapean [7] and transfer it to systems of linear equations that might not directly correspond to interpolation.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2014

AND-compression of NP-complete problems: Streamlined proof and minor observations

Drucker (2012) proved the following result: Unless the unlikely complexity-theoretic collapse coNP is in NP/poly occurs, there is no AND-compression for SAT. The result has implications for the compressibility and kernelizability of a whole range of NP-complete parameterized problems. We present a streamlined proof of Drucker's theorem. An AND-compression is a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm that maps a set of SAT-instances $x_1,\dots,x_t$ to a single SAT-instance $y$ of size poly(max $|x_i|$) such that $y$ is satisfiable if and only if all $x_i$ are satisfiable. The "AND" in the name stems from the fact that the predicate "$y$ is satisfiable" can be written as the AND of all predicates "$x_i$ is satisfiable". Drucker's result complements the result by Bodlaender et al. (2009) and Fortnow and Santhanam (2010), who proved the analogous statement for OR-compressions, and Drucker's proof not only subsumes that result but also extends it to randomized compression algorithms that are allowed to have a certain probability of failure. Drucker (2012) presented two proofs: The first uses information theory and the minimax theorem from game theory, and the second is an elementary, iterative proof that is not as general. In our proof, we realize the iterative structure as a generalization of the arguments of Ko (1983) for P-selective sets, which use the fact that tournaments have dominating sets of logarithmic size. We generalize this fact to hypergraph tournaments. Our proof achieves the full generality of Drucker's theorem, avoids the minimax theorem, and restricts the use of information theory to a single, intuitive lemma about the average noise sensitivity of compressive maps. To prove this lemma, we use the same information-theoretic inequalities as Drucker.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2014

On Problems as Hard as CNFSAT

The field of exact exponential time algorithms for NP-hard problems has thrived over the last decade. While exhaustive search remains asymptotically the fastest known algorithm for some basic problems, difficult and non-trivial exponential time algorithms have been found for a myriad of problems, including Graph Coloring, Hamiltonian Path, Dominating Set and 3-CNF-Sat. In some instances, improving these algorithms further seems to be out of reach. The CNF-Sat problem is the canonical example of a problem for which the trivial exhaustive search algorithm runs in time O(2^n), where n is the number of variables in the input formula. While there exist non-trivial algorithms for CNF-Sat that run in time o(2^n), no algorithm was able to improve the growth rate 2 to a smaller constant, and hence it is natural to conjecture that 2 is the optimal growth rate. The strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH) by Impagliazzo and Paturi [JCSS 2001] goes a little bit further and asserts that, for every epsilon<1, there is a (large) integer k such that that k-CNF-Sat cannot be computed in time 2^{epsilon n}. In this paper, we show that, for every epsilon < 1, the problems Hitting Set, Set Splitting, and NAE-Sat cannot be computed in time O(2^{epsilon n}) unless SETH fails. Here n is the number of elements or variables in the input. For these problems, we actually get an equivalence to SETH in a certain sense. We conjecture that SETH implies a similar statement for Set Cover, and prove that, under this assumption, the fastest known algorithms for Steinter Tree, Connected Vertex Cover, Set Partitioning, and the pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for Subset Sum cannot be significantly improved. Finally, we justify our assumption about the hardness of Set Cover by showing that the parity of the number of set covers cannot be computed in time O(2^{epsilon n}) for any epsilon<1 unless SETH fails.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2012

Exponential Time Complexity of the Permanent and the Tutte Polynomial

We show conditional lower bounds for well-studied #P-hard problems: (a) The number of satisfying assignments of a 2-CNF formula with n variables cannot be counted in time exp(o(n)), and the same is true for computing the number of all independent sets in an n-vertex graph. (b) The permanent of an n x n matrix with entries 0 and 1 cannot be computed in time exp(o(n)). (c) The Tutte polynomial of an n-vertex multigraph cannot be computed in time exp(o(n)) at most evaluation points (x,y) in the case of multigraphs, and it cannot be computed in time exp(o(n/polylog n)) in the case of simple graphs. Our lower bounds are relative to (variants of) the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), which says that the satisfiability of n-variable 3-CNF formulas cannot be decided in time exp(o(n)). We relax this hypothesis by introducing its counting version #ETH, namely that the satisfying assignments cannot be counted in time exp(o(n)). In order to use #ETH for our lower bounds, we transfer the sparsification lemma for d-CNF formulas to the counting setting.

cs.CC↗