SearcharxivโŒ• Search

arXiv subjects

Holger Kaden

Publications and source records attributed to Holger Kaden.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Considerations for constructing Andrews-Curtis invariants of s-move 3-cells

Two simple homotopy equivalent 2-complexes K2 and L2 are related by an algebraic criterion of their corresponding presentations as stated in [HoMeSier]. Frank Quinn set it into a topological context (see [Qu1]) and call these 2-complexes related by an s-move. Using elementary 3-expansions, K2 extends to 3-cells in K3 respectively L2 to 3-cells in L3. By associating both explorations we obtain a decomposition of the s-move 3-cells into a sequence of 2-cells. We present ideas, sketch of proofs and problems to use it for constructing an Andrews-Curtis invariant on s-move 3-cells.

math.GTโ†—

Considerations about Andrews-Curtis invariants based on sliced 2-complexes

We consider a 2-complex in a particular form, called the Quinn model of a 2-complex. It can be sliced in graphs, where a change from one graph to another can be organized by a sequence of local transitions, which are described in a list of F. Quinn [Q1]. The decomposition of that 2-complex into graphs has to be translated into an algebraic context (for example Topological Quantum field theory (TQFT)) to construct suitable potential invariants under 3-deformations. These invariants are accessible for computation by using a supercomputer and the results may yield a counterexample to the Andrews-Curtis conjecture. To achieve invariance under 3-deformations, there are obvious topological relations among the local transitions, for example to deform a bubble out of a rectangle. In this paper our main result is that we contribute a complete list of such topological relations in a totally geometric fashion. One outcome of our considerations is that the corresponding list of F. Quinn [Q1] is extended by an additional relation which takes care of locally changing a slicing. We do not know so far whether this relation is a consequence of the remaining ones. But it may be crucial for further work to focus on such subtleties, as algebraic "simplifications", where this question is bypassed, so far have been unable to distinguish between simple homotopy and 3-deformations at all. In our introduction we summarize some known results on the situation when passing to Algebra; and in ยง 8 we calculate an example of an algebraic TQFT in order to demonstrate that our additional relation holds. All considerations are carried out for 2-complexes with two generators and two defining relators. But the results also hold in the general case.

math.GTโ†—