arXiv subjects

Hong-Rong Qi

Publications and source records attributed to Hong-Rong Qi.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2023

On the nature of X(3960)

A near-threshold enhancement in the $D_s^+ D_s^-$ system, dubbed as $X(3960)$, is observed by the LHCb collaboration recently. A combined analysis on $\chi_{c0}(3930)~(\to D^+ D^-)$, $X(3960)~(\to D_s^+ D_s^-)$, and $X(3915)~(\to J/\psi\omega)$ is performed using both a $K$-matrix approach of $D_{(s)}\bar{D}_{(s)}$ four-point contact interactions and a model of Flatt\'e-like parameterizations. The use of the pole counting rule and spectral density function sum rule indicate, under current statistics, that this $D_s^+ D_s^-$ near-threshold state has probably the mixed nature of a $c\bar{c}$ confining state and $D_s^+ D_s^-$ continuum.

hep-ph↗

arXiv2022

The pole counting rule and XYZ states

The pole counting rule is a powerful and model-independent method to distinguish a confining state from a hadronic molecule. It has been applied to the explorations of $X(6900)$, $X_1(2900)$ as well as $Z_c(3900)$, $X(3872)$, $X(4660)$, etc.. For $X(6900)$, both a confining state and a molecular state are not excluded, because lacking of enough data. For $X_1(2900)$, the analysis shows that it should be a $\bar{D}_1 K$ molecule, with $J^P=1^-$ and an iso-singlet interpretation is much more favorable. Finally, it is noted that almost all XYZ particles with exotic quantum numbers can be interpreted as hadronic molecules. The $X(3872)$ is, however, more like a charmonium.

hep-ph↗

arXiv2021

X_1(2900) as a D_1 K molecule

The analyses of the LHCb data on X(2900) in the D^- K^+ spectrum are performed. Both dynamically generated and explicitly introduced X_1(2900) are considered. The results show that both these two approaches support the interpretation of X_1(2900) as a bar{D}_1 K molecular state, with J^{P}=1^- and an iso-singlet interpretation is much more favorable. The effect of triangle singularity on the production of X_1(2900) is also discussed, and it is found that it cannot be interpreted as a pure triangle cusp.

hep-ph↗

arXiv2020

Some remarks on $X(6900)$

The analysis of the LHCb data on $X(6900)$ found in the di-$\jpsi$ system is performed using a momentum-dependent Flatt\'{e}-like parameterization. The use of the pole counting rule and spectral density function sum rule give consistent conclusions that both confining states and molecular states are possible, or it is unable to distinguish the nature of $X(6900)$, if only the di-$\jpsi$ experimental data with current statistics are available. Nevertheless, we found that the lowest state in the di-$J/\psi$ system has very likely the same quantum numbers as $X(6900)$, and $X(6900)$ is probably not interpreted as a $J/\psi-\psi(2S)$ molecular state.

hep-ph↗

arXiv2020

On leptonic width of $X(4260)$

New measurements on cross sections in $e^+e^-\to J/\psi\pi^+\pi^-$, $h_c\pi^+\pi^-$, $D^0D^{*-}\pi^++c.c.$, $\psi(2S)\pi^+\pi^-$, $\omega\chi_{c0}$ and $J/\psi\eta$ channels have been carried out by BESIII, Belle and BABAR collaborations, and also in the $D_s^*\bar D_s^*$ channel. We perform extensive numerical analyses by combining all these data available, together with those in $D\bar D^*$ and $D^*\bar D^*$ channels. Though the latter show no evident peak around $\sqrt{s}=4.230$ GeV, the missing $X(4260)$ is explained as that it is concealed by the interference effects of the well established charmonia $\psi(4040)$, $\psi(4160)$ and $\psi(4415)$. Our analyses reveal that the leptonic decay width of $X(4260)$ ranges from $O(10^2)$ eV to $O(1)$ keV, and hence may be explained in the conventional quark model picture. That is, the $X(4260)$ may well be interpreted as a mixture of $4^3S_1$ and $3^3D_1$ states.

hep-ph↗

arXiv2019

Discussions on the Line-shape of $X(4660)$ Resonance

A careful reanalysis is made on $e^+e^-\to X(4660)\to (\Lambda_c\bar{\Lambda}_c)/(\psi'\pi\pi)$ processes, aiming at resolving the apparent conflicts between Belle and BESIII data above $\Lambda_c\bar{\Lambda}_c$ threshold. We use a model containing a Breit-Wigner resonance and $\Lambda_c\bar{\Lambda}_c$ four-point contact interactions, with which the enhancement right above the $\Lambda_c\bar{\Lambda}_c$ threshold is well explained by a virtual pole generated by $\Lambda_c\bar{\Lambda}_c$ attractive final state interaction, located at $M_V=4.566\pm0.007$ GeV. Meanwhile, $X(4660)$ remains to be a typical Breit-Wigner resonance, and is hence of confinement nature. Our analysis strongly suggests the existence of the virtual pole with statistical significance of $4.2$ standard deviation ($\sigma$). Nevertheless, the conclusion crucially depends on the line-shape of cross sections which are of limited statistics, hence we urge new experimental analyses from Belle II, BESIII, and LHCb to settle the issue.

hep-ph↗