arXiv subjects

Hongao Zhu

Publications and source records attributed to Hongao Zhu.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

The First ChineseBabyLM Challenge: training data-efficient and cognitively plausible language models for Chinese

This paper presents the first ChineseBabyLM Challenge, organized as part of NLPCC 2026. The challenge asked participants to train language models from scratch using no more than 102M Chinese words. The models were evaluated on three tracks: natural language understanding, cognitive alignment, and Hanzi knowledge. There were no restrictions on tokenizers, model architectures, or the number of training epochs. Eighteen teams submitted 28 distinct models, generating 74 result files. The overall-winning team used a DeBERTa-v2 architecture and introduced an auxiliary pinyin-prediction objective during pretraining. Several submissions also explored curriculum-learning strategies and architectural innovations. Overall, the challenge provides a benchmark for advancing data-efficient and cognitively plausible approaches to Chinese language modeling.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

LLMs for automatic annotation of Mandarin narrative transcripts

Linguistic annotation of transcribed speech is essential for research in language acquisition, language disorders, and sociolinguistics, yet remains labor-intensive and time-consuming. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating annotation tasks, their ability to handle complex discourse-level annotation in non-English languages remains understudied. This study evaluates whether LLMs can reliably annotate narrative macrostructure-the hierarchical organization of story grammar elements-in spoken Mandarin, using the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (MAIN) as a testbed. We compared four LLMs against trained human annotators on narratives produced by children, young adults, and older adults. The best-performing model achieved agreement with human raters (k=.794) approaching human-human reliability levels (k=.872) while reducing annotation time by 65%, whereas the locally deployable lightweight model performed substantially worse. Annotation difficulty varied systematically by macrostructure element type, with categories requiring subtle semantic differentiation posing persistent challenges. Furthermore, model reliability decreased on young adult narratives, which exhibited greater lexical variation, semantic ambiguity, and multi-element integration within single utterances. These findings suggest that LLMs can effectively support discourse-level annotation in non-English spoken corpora, while highlighting the continued need for human oversight in semantically complex tasks. Our prompt templates are open sourced for future use.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

A Systematic Assessment of Language Models with Linguistic Minimal Pairs in Chinese

We present ZhoBLiMP, the largest linguistic minimal pair benchmark for Chinese, with over 100 paradigms, ranging from topicalization to the \textit{Ba} construction. We then train from scratch a suite of Chinese language models (LMs) with different tokenizers, parameter sizes, and token volumes, to study the learning curves of LMs on Chinese. To mitigate the biases introduced by unequal lengths of the sentences in a minimal pair, we propose a new metric named sub-linear length normalized log-probabilities (SLLN-LP). Using SLLN-LP as the metric, our results show that \textsc{Anaphor}, \textsc{Quantifiers}, and \textsc{Ellipsis} in Chinese are difficult for LMs even up to 32B parameters, and that SLLN-LP successfully mitigates biases in ZhoBLiMP, JBLiMP and BLiMP. We conclude that future evaluations should be more carefully designed to consider the intricate relations between linking functions, LMs, and targeted minimal pairs.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

The Inverse Scaling Effect of Pre-Trained Language Model Surprisal Is Not Due to Data Leakage

In psycholinguistic modeling, surprisal from larger pre-trained language models has been shown to be a poorer predictor of naturalistic human reading times. However, it has been speculated that this may be due to data leakage that caused language models to see the text stimuli during training. This paper presents two studies to address this concern at scale. The first study reveals relatively little leakage of five naturalistic reading time corpora in two pre-training datasets in terms of length and frequency of token $n$-gram overlap. The second study replicates the negative relationship between language model size and the fit of surprisal to reading times using models trained on 'leakage-free' data that overlaps only minimally with the reading time corpora. Taken together, this suggests that previous results using language models trained on these corpora are not driven by the effects of data leakage.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

Vectors from Larger Language Models Predict Human Reading Time and fMRI Data More Poorly when Dimensionality Expansion is Controlled

The impressive linguistic abilities of large language models (LLMs) have recommended them as models of human sentence processing, with some conjecturing a positive 'quality-power' relationship, in which language models' (LMs') fit to psychometric data continues to improve as their ability to predict words in context increases. This is important because it might suggest that elements of LLM architecture reflect the architecture of the human sentence processing faculty, and that any inadequacies in predicting human reading time and brain imaging data may be attributed to insufficient model complexity, which recedes as larger models become available. But recent studies have shown this scaling inverts after a point, as LMs become excessively large and accurate, when information-theoretic surprisal is used as a predictor. Other studies propose the use of entire vectors from differently sized LLMs, still showing positive scaling, casting doubt on the value of surprisal as a predictor, but do not control for dimensionality expansion using untrained LLMs with more than 1.6B parameters. This study evaluates scaling of LLM vector predictors controlled using untrained LLMs with up to 66B parameters. Results show that inverse scaling obtains, and moreover the contribution of trained LMs over corresponding untrained LMs drops to zero at around a few billion parameters on most datasets.

cs.CL↗