Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Hongfei Lin

Publications and source records attributed to Hongfei Lin.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
arXiv2026

The Straight and Narrow: Do LLMs Possess an Internal Moral Path?

Enhancing the moral alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a critical challenge in AI safety. Current alignment techniques often act as superficial guardrails, leaving the intrinsic moral representations of LLMs largely untouched. In this paper, we bridge this gap by leveraging Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) to map and manipulate the fine-grained moral landscape of LLMs. Through cross-lingual linear probing, we validate the shared nature of moral representations in middle layers and uncover a shared yet different moral subspace between English and Chinese. Building upon this, we extract steerable Moral Vectors and successfully validate their efficacy at both internal and behavioral levels. Leveraging the high generalizability of morality, we propose Adaptive Moral Fusion (AMF), a dynamic inference-time intervention that synergizes probe detection with vector injection to tackle the safety-helpfulness trade-off. Empirical results confirm that our approach acts as a targeted intrinsic defense, effectively reducing incorrect refusals on benign queries while minimizing jailbreak success rates compared to standard baselines.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Enhancing Biomedical Named Entity Recognition via Multiple Programming Languages Instruction Tuning and Ensemble Method

Instruction tuning has become a common paradigm for applying large language models (LLMs) to biomedical named entity recognition (BioNER). However, existing instruction-tuning approaches still face two key challenges. First, conventional natural-language instructions typically serialize BioNER annotations as flat textual outputs, providing limited structural constraints for typed entity extraction. Second, high-quality biomedical annotations are limited, and learning from a single serialized output form may restrict structural diversity and reduce model robustness. Although external biomedical knowledge can be introduced to alleviate data scarcity, it often requires costly resource construction. To address these challenges, we propose MITE, a Multiple Programming Languages Instruction Tuning and Ensemble method for BioNER. MITE reformulates BioNER as a structure-to-structure generation task by representing both instructions and entity outputs in code-formatted representations. Specifically, each training instance is transformed into multiple programming-language formats, including Python, C++, and Java, while preserving the same underlying entity semantics. These language-specific representations provide structurally diverse supervision without requiring external biomedical knowledge or additional annotations. During inference, MITE aggregates predictions from different code formats through an entity-level voting strategy, reducing language-specific prediction variance and improving robustness. Experiments on three widely used BioNER datasets demonstrate that MITE achieves competitive performance against representative BERT-based and LLM-based baselines, attaining the best results on two benchmarks. Ablation studies further validate the effectiveness of multi-language representations.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Overview of CHIP 2026 Shared Task 1: Patient-Specific Phenotype Concept Recognition in Full-Text Biomedical Literature

Automatic phenotype information extraction plays an important role in rare disease diagnosis, genotype-phenotype analysis, and precision medicine. However, accurately identifying phenotype concepts and determining their associations with specific patients remain challenging, particularly in full-text biomedical articles involving multiple patients and complex clinical descriptions. This paper presents an overview of CHIP 2026 Shared Task 1, which aims to promote the development of methods for patient-specific phenotype concept recognition from full-text biomedical literature. The task consists of two subtasks: full-text phenotype concept recognition and patient-specific phenotype association. For this evaluation, we used 200 annotated full-text biomedical articles from the PatientPheX dataset, containing 506 patients, 15,193 phenotype mentions, and 5,656 patient-phenotype associations. A total of 455 teams registered for the competition, with 189 and 103 valid submissions received on the Phase A and Phase B leaderboards, respectively. The best-performing system achieved an overall score of 0.7389 on the final test set, outperforming the baseline by 8.37 percentage points. The top-performing teams explored diverse approaches combining biomedical language models, large language models (LLMs), and ensemble strategies. The evaluation results highlight both the potential of these approaches and the remaining challenges in patient attribution and phenotype normalization from full-text biomedical literature. The post-evaluation phase remains open at https://tianchi.aliyun.com/competition/entrance/532512.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Tool-Augmented Large Language Models for Reliable Medical Calculation from Patient Notes

Medical calculators translate raw patient observations into clinically actionable values and scores. However, applying these calculators directly to free-form patient notes requires precise variable extraction combined with the exact execution of complex formulas, scoring rules, and output conventions. Relying solely on direct large language model (LLM) prompting is unreliable in this context, as rule recall, parameter extraction, arithmetic reasoning, and formatting become entangled within a single generative step. To address these limitations, we propose a tool-augmented LLM framework for reliable medical calculation from patient notes. The framework retrieves and structures calculator specifications, generates reusable executable tools, and uses a constrained extractor to map each patient note to calculator-ready inputs. The tools then perform deterministic calculation, separating clinical language understanding from rule execution and arithmetic. Evaluated on the MedCalc-Bench dataset, our method achieves 86.73% final-answer accuracy, outperforming the one-shot prompting and supervised fine tuning-only baselines by 24.0 and 17.27 percentage points. Ablation and error analyses show that these performance gains are primarily driven by rule-grounded tool synthesis and schema-constrained extraction, whereas remaining failures are concentrated in clinical-semantic extraction and benchmark-specific output contracts. By grounding calculator logic in executable tools, the proposed approach alleviates arithmetic hallucinations and improves the computational reliability of the final clinical outputs.

cs.AI↗
arXiv2026

Can Decision Models Understand Stance? Evaluating Jev Against General-Purpose LLMs

Stance detection requires identifying an author's attitude toward a given target, sometimes based on conversational context. Jev, a specialized decision model designed for structured decision-making, offers an alternative to general-purpose large language models (LLMs). In this work, we evaluate Jev on two stance detection datasets, VAST (English texts) and ZS-CSD (Chinese conversations), comparing it with four general-purpose LLMs and two fine-tuned models. Results show that Jev achieves competitive performance on VAST, matching GPT-5.6 and outperforming the other general-purpose LLMs. However, it falls behind stronger LLMs on ZS-CSD, particularly in distinguishing favor from against. Further analysis suggests that this limitation may be related to understanding reply relationships and stance direction rather than conversation length alone. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of Jev for stance detection.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Specialized Decision Models vs. General-Purpose LLMs: Benchmarking Jev Across Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multilingual Tasks

Jev is a "System One" model that returns a choice among given options instead of generating text. We study how such a specialized decision model compares with general-purpose large language models (LLMs). We evaluate Jev on 13 multiple-choice benchmarks covering knowledge, reasoning, and multilingual understanding, and compare it with 19 LLMs in three tiers: frontier, representative, and small. Jev is competitive with frontier LLMs on knowledge and commonsense benchmarks and obtains the best score on MMLU-Redux and ARC-Challenge. Outside mathematics, it also outperforms most representative LLMs and all small LLMs. However, it falls behind on mathematical word problems: on MathQA, it is 17.7 points below the frontier median and scores lower than all 19 LLMs. These results indicate that a specialized decision model can match general-purpose LLMs on decisions that rely mainly on knowledge, but not on decisions that require multi-step calculation.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

UltraG-Bench: A Multi-task Benchmark for assessing Large Vision-Language Models on Pixel-level Evidence Grounding in Ultrasound

Ultrasound is one of the most widely used medical imaging modalities, and recent large vision-language models(VLMs) have shown increasing capabilities in ultrasound image understanding. However, these models fail to provide pixel-level visual evidence aligned with their semantic predictions, and their fine-grained grounding capability in ultrasound remains largely unclear. We introduce UltraG-Bench, a large-scale multi-task benchmark for evaluating pixel-level evidence grounding in ultrasound. UltraG-Bench is built by annotating 40 public ultrasound segmentation datasets spanning 13 anatomical categories, and comprises three progressive tasks: instruction-guided segmentation, evidence-grounded VQA, and evidence-grounded report generation, with 331125, 666779, and 138832 annotations, respectively. Comprehensive evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art models reveals a substantial gap between semantic understanding and fine-grained pixel-level localization. We further propose UltraG-Agent, which combines the semantic reasoning capabilities of a VLM with the ultrasound-specific segmentation capability of UltraSAM3. Experiments show that UltraG-Agent substantially improves both semantic prediction and pixel-level visual grounding. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/zhuqh19/UltraG-Bench.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

RexDrug: Reliable Multi-Drug Combination Extraction through Reasoning-Enhanced LLMs

Automated Drug Combination Extraction (DCE) from large-scale biomedical literature is crucial for advancing precision medicine and pharmacological research. However, existing relation extraction methods primarily focus on binary interactions and struggle to model variable-length n-ary drug combinations, where complex compatibility logic and distributed evidence need to be considered. To address these limitations, we propose RexDrug, an end-to-end reasoning-enhanced relation extraction framework for n-ary drug combination extraction based on large language models. RexDrug adopts a two-stage training strategy. First, a multi-agent collaborative mechanism is utilized to automatically generate high-quality expert-like reasoning traces for supervised fine-tuning. Second, reinforcement learning with a multi-dimensional reward function specifically tailored for DCE is applied to further refine reasoning quality and extraction accuracy. Extensive experiments on the DrugComb dataset show that RexDrug consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines for n-ary extraction. Additional evaluation on the DDI13 corpus confirms its generalizability to binary drugdrug interaction tasks. Human expert assessment and automatic reasoning metrics further indicates that RexDrug produces coherent medical reasoning while accurately identifying complex therapeutic regimens. These results establish RexDrug as a scalable and reliable solution for complex biomedical relation extraction from unstructured text. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/DUTIR-BioNLP/RexDrug

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Learn Before You Judge: Progressive Knowledge-to-Decision Alignment for Explainable Hateful Meme Detection

Hateful memes spread abusive content through implicit interactions between images and text, posing serious threats to the safety of online communities. In recent years, multimodal large language models have been widely used for hateful meme detection and are increasingly adopted to generate explainable detection results. However, we find that existing explain-then-detect methods often couple explanation generation and label prediction within the same training process. This coupling causes interference between task objectives, leading to limited detection performance and even worse results than simple SFT baselines. To address these challenges, we propose ProKDA, a progressive knowledge-to-decision alignment method for explainable hateful meme detection. Inspired by the human annotation training process, ProKDA first uses an agentic background knowledge construction pipeline to obtain external knowledge related to meme understanding. It then adopts a three-stage training strategy that sequentially performs background knowledge learning, hatefulness detection learning, and hatefulness boundary alignment. Unlike prior explain-then-detect methods that jointly optimize both tasks, ProKDA focuses on a single training objective at each stage. This design reduces interference between the two tasks and progressively transforms background knowledge into robust detection decisions. Experiments on three public hateful meme benchmarks show that ProKDA achieves state-of-the-art detection performance and provides accurate, explainable, and evidence-supported decisions for hateful meme moderation. Project page: https://meizhiyuan88666.github.io/prokda.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Whitewashing Hate, Smearing Harmless Content: Annotator-Style Rebuttal Attacks on LLM-Based Moderation

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for hate speech moderation, often within human--AI workflows in which reviewers provide feedback before a final decision. Such feedback introduces two manipulation directions: whitewashing hateful content as normal and smearing normal content as hateful. This study examines the susceptibility of initially correct model judgments to annotator-style rebuttals and analyzes whether attack effectiveness differs across manipulation directions. We introduce a rejudge protocol that extends direct contradiction with decision-boundary perturbations and adversarial rationales. Experiments with multiple LLMs on two hate speech datasets show that annotator-style rebuttals substantially degrade moderation performance, with stronger effects in multi-turn settings. The results further reveal stable, model-specific asymmetries between whitewashing and smearing across attack configurations, indicating distinct directional vulnerability patterns. Explicit reasoning prompts and defensive instructions reduce these effects but do not eliminate them. These findings highlight the need for direction-aware safeguards and dedicated feedback-robustness evaluation in human--AI moderation workflows.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

MediRec: Enhancing Chinese Medication Recommendation with Explainable Clinical Reasoning

Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong potential for clinical decision support through their advanced language understanding and reasoning capabilities. However, their application to Chinese clinical medication recommendation remains largely unexplored. Existing approaches are primarily developed on English electronic health record datasets and focus on coarse-grained medication code prediction, offering limited support for interpretable clinical decision-making. In this work, we propose MediRec, an explainable LLM-based framework for Chinese medication recommendation from electronic health records. MediRec combines clinically grounded reasoning-chain distillation with reinforcement learning to improve both recommendation accuracy and interpretability. Comprehensive experiments on a Chinese medication recommendation benchmark show that MediRec achieves strong performance, with an F1 score of 0.5813 and a Jaccard score of 0.4626. Further analyses indicate that MediRec generates clinically plausible recommendations with transparent reasoning, demonstrating its effectiveness for explainable medication decision support in Chinese healthcare settings.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

UltraSAM3: A Concept-Driven Foundation Model for Universal Ultrasound Image Segmentation

Ultrasound imaging has become increasingly widespread in clinical practice due to its portability, low cost and real-time capability, making ultrasound image segmentation important. However, ultrasound images differ substantially from CT, MRI, and other medical imaging modalities, as they are often affected by speckle noise, low contrast, acoustic shadows and ambiguous boundaries. Existing ultrasound segmentation methods are still mainly limited to task-specific models or visual-prompt-based foundation models, which are either tailored to particular tasks or require expert-provided visual prompts, making them inconvenient for flexible clinical use. To address these challenges, we propose UltraSAM3, a concept-driven foundation model for universal ultrasound image segmentation. Unlike conventional models, UltraSAM3 enables text-based target specification by adapting SAM3 to ultrasound-specific image--mask--concept triplets. The model is trained on a large-scale ultrasound segmentation corpus covering 37 public datasets and 13 anatomical categories, allowing it to align ultrasound visual patterns with clinically meaningful concepts across diverse organs and lesions. To further improve usability under realistic clinical interaction, we propose an instruction-guided agent that parses complex natural language queries into concise ultrasound concept prompts for UltraSAM3. Extensive experiments demonstrate that UltraSAM3 consistently outperforms representative concept- and text-driven biomedical segmentation models on multi-organ ultrasound benchmarks, external datasets, and visual-prompt-enhanced settings. Moreover, the agent improves segmentation robustness for complex user instructions. These results indicate that ultrasound-specific concept adaptation is effective for building generalizable and interactive ultrasound segmentation foundation models.

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Decoding Multimodal Cues: Unveiling the Implicit Meaning Behind Hateful Videos

Hateful videos have become prevalent on online platforms, highlighting an urgent need for effective detection. However, existing studies primarily focus on binary classification and fail to provide contextual rationales that reveal the implicit meanings behind these judgments, significantly undermining model explainability. To fill this gap, we aim to achieve explainable hateful video detection, enabling models to provide contextual rationales that integrate relevant evidence and logical reasoning alongside decisions. This approach can comprehensively enhance the understanding of video content and the explainability of the decision-making process. We first introduce two datasets, Ex-HateMM and Ex-ImpliHateVid, for explainable hateful video detection. Each dataset provides fine-grained annotations of multimodal harmful elements, along with contextual rationales. We then propose an Information Augmentation and Reasoning Enhancement (IARE) framework designed for explainable detection. The framework employs an information augmentation phase that leverages the multimodal chain-of-thought to integrate harmful elements, thereby enriching rationale evidence. Additionally, IARE incorporates a reasoning enhancement phase, in which Direct Preference Optimization guides the model toward correct reasoning paths and away from incorrect ones, thereby improving the logical coherence of its justifications. We conduct extensive experiments on the two datasets, comparing multiple baselines with our proposed IARE framework. The results demonstrate that IARE achieves state-of-the-art performance while also generating accurate rationales.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Distinguishing Right from Wrong in Debates: Attribution Analysis of Chinese Harmful Memes

Research on harmful meme detection has garnered significant attention, resulting in the development of numerous datasets and methods. However, progress in detecting Chinese harmful memes lags considerably, primarily due to two challenges: first, accurately assessing a meme's harmfulness depends heavily on understanding deep cultural context; second, many memes are semantically ambiguous, making harmfulness highly subjective. To address these issues, we focus on the interpretable detection of Chinese harmful memes by constructing the first Chinese harmful meme explanation dataset, Ex-ToxiCN-MM. This dataset offers opposing interpretations, categorized as "harmful" and "non-harmful", for each meme, aiming to rigorously evaluate a model's ability to discern and comprehend ambiguous, culturally grounded content. We built a specialized knowledge base of Chinese cultural concepts and offensive vocabulary to supply models with essential prior knowledge (C-HarmKB). To address the ambiguity and lack of background knowledge in meme attribution, we have developed a comprehensive attribution analysis framework, RIKE, which includes an Attribution Knowledge Enhancement module (AKE) and a Relative Intent Reasoning module (RIR). Extensive quantitative and qualitative experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms mainstream baseline models across multiple metrics in the task of attributing harmful memes in Chinese. The code, Ex-ToxiCN-MM dataset, and Chinese Harmful Semantic Knowledge Base (C-HarmKB) involved in this study have been open-sourced at https://github.com/wimiw123/Ex-ToxiCN-MM

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Harder to Defend: Towards Chinese Toxicity Attacks via Implicit Enhancement and Obfuscation Rewriting

Large language models (LLMs) require robust toxicity evaluation beyond explicit wording. This setting remains underexplored in Chinese, where toxicity may combine semantic indirectness with surface obfuscation. We introduce Chinese Implicit Toxicity Attack (CITA), a controlled red-team evaluation and defense-data generation framework, not a deployable evasion tool. CITA uses three stages: (i) Harmful Intent Learning, (ii) Implicit Toxicity Enhancement, and (iii) Obfuscation Variant Rewriting, to preserve harmful intent, increase implicitness, and add controlled surface variants. On CITA-generated evaluation samples, the seven tested detectors exhibit substantial missed-detection risks, reaching an average ASR of 69.48%; human evaluation further confirms preserved harmfulness and increased implicitness/evasiveness. As a downstream defense application, we fine-tune a Chinese Implicit Toxicity Defense model (CITD) with CITA-generated red-team data, showing that such data can improve robustness through additional training.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

Aligning LLM Uncertainty with Human Disagreement in Subjectivity Analysis

Large language models for subjectivity analysis are typically trained with aggregated labels, which compress variations in human judgment into a single supervision signal. This paradigm overlooks the intrinsic uncertainty of low-agreement samples and often induces overconfident predictions, undermining reliability and generalization in complex subjective settings. In this work, we advocate uncertainty-aware subjectivity analysis, where models are expected to make predictions while expressing uncertainty that reflects human disagreement. To operationalize this perspective, we propose a two-phase Disagreement Perception and Uncertainty Alignment (DPUA) framework. Specifically, DPUA jointly models label prediction, rationale generation, and uncertainty expression under an uncertainty-aware setting. In the disagreement perception phase, adaptive decoupled learning enhances the model's sensitivity to disagreement-related cues while preserving task performance. In the uncertainty alignment phase, GRPO-based reward optimization further improves uncertainty-aware reasoning and aligns the model's confidence expression with the human disagreement distribution. Experiments on three subjectivity analysis tasks show that DPUA preserves task performance while better aligning model uncertainty with human disagreement, mitigating overconfidence on boundary samples, and improving out-of-distribution generalization.

cs.CL↗
arXiv2026

E2E-GMNER: End-to-End Generative Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition

Grounded Multimodal Named Entity Recognition (GMNER) aims to jointly identify named entity mentions in text, predict their semantic types, and ground each entity to a corresponding visual region in an associated image. Existing approaches predominantly adopt pipeline-based architectures that decouple textual entity recognition and visual grounding, leading to error accumulation and suboptimal joint optimization. In this paper, we propose E2E-GMNER, a fully end-to-end generative framework that unifies entity recognition, semantic typing, visual grounding, and implicit knowledge reasoning within a single multimodal large language model. We formulate GMNER as an instruction-tuned conditional generation task and incorporate chain-of-thought reasoning to enable the model to adaptively determine when visual evidence or background knowledge is informative, reducing reliance on noisy cues. To further address the instability of generative bounding box prediction, we introduce Gaussian Risk-Aware Box Perturbation (GRBP), which replaces hard box supervision with probabilistically perturbed soft targets to improve robustness against annotation noise and discretization errors. Extensive experiments on the Twitter-GMNER and Twitter-FMNERG benchmarks demonstrate that E2E-GMNER achieves highly competitive performance compared with state of the art methods, validating the effectiveness of unified end-to-end optimization and noise-aware grounding supervision. Code is available at:https://github.com/Finch-coder/E2E-GMNER

cs.CV↗
arXiv2026

Propagating Similarity, Mitigating Uncertainty: Similarity Propagation-enhanced Uncertainty for Multimodal Recommendation

Multimodal Recommendation (MMR) systems are crucial for modern platforms but are often hampered by inherent noise and uncertainty in modal features, such as blurry images, diverse visual appearances, or ambiguous text. Existing methods often overlook this modality-specific uncertainty, leading to ineffective feature fusion. Furthermore, they fail to leverage rich similarity patterns among users and items to refine representations and their corresponding uncertainty estimates. To address these challenges, we propose a novel framework, Similarity Propagation-enhanced Uncertainty for Multimodal Recommendation (SPUMR). SPUMR explicitly models and mitigates uncertainty by first constructing the Modality Similarity Graph and the Collaborative Similarity Graph to refine representations from both content and behavioral perspectives. The Uncertainty-aware Preference Aggregation module then adaptively fuses the refined multimodal features, assigning greater weight to more reliable modalities. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that SPUMR achieves significant improvements over existing leading methods.

cs.IR↗