arXiv subjects

Horia F. Pop

Publications and source records attributed to Horia F. Pop.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Matrix invertible extensions over commutative rings. Part III: Hermite rings

We reobtain and often refine prior criteria due to Kaplansky, McGovern, Roitman, Shchedryk, Wiegand, and Zabavsky--Bilavska and obtain new criteria for a Hermite ring to be an \textsl{EDR}. We mention three criteria: (1) a Hermite ring $R$ is an \textsl{EDR} iff for all pairs $(a,c)\in R^2$, the product homomorphism $U(R/Rac)\times U\bigl(R/Rc(1-a)\bigr)\to U(R/Rc)$ between groups of units is surjective; (2) a reduced Hermite ring $R$ is an \textsl{EDR} iff it is a pre-Schreier ring and for each $a\in R$, every zero determinant unimodular $2\times 2$ matrix with entries in $R/Ra$ lifts to a zero determinant matrix with entries in $R$; (3) a Bézout domain $R$ is an \textsl{EDD} iff for all triples $(a,b,c)\in R^3$ there exists a unimodular pair $(e,f)\in R^2$ such that $(a,e)$ and $(be+af,1-a-bc)$ are unimodular pairs. We use these criteria to show that each Bézout ring $R$ that is an $(SU)_2$ ring (as introduced by Lorenzini) such that for each nonzero $a\in R$ there exists no nontrivial self-dual projective $R/Ra$-module of rank $1$ generated by $2$ elements (e.g., all its elements are squares), is an \textsl{EDR}.

math.AC↗

arXiv2025

Matrix invertible extensions over commutative rings. Part II: determinant liftability

A unimodular $2\times 2$ matrix $A$ with entries in a commutative ring $R$ is called weakly determinant liftable if there exists a matrix $B$ congruent to $A$ modulo $R\det(A)$ and $\det(B)=0$; if we can choose $B$ to be unimodular, then $A$ is called determinant liftable. If $A$ is extendable to an invertible $3\times 3$ matrix $A^+$, then $A$ is weakly determinant liftable. If $A$ is simple extendable (i.e., we can choose $A^+$ such that its $(3,3)$ entry is $0$), then $A$ is determinant liftable. We present necessary and/or sufficient criteria for $A$ to be (weakly) determinant liftable and we use them to show that if $R$ is a $Π_2$ ring in the sense of Part I (resp.\ is a pre-Schreier domain), then $A$ is simply extendable (resp.\ extendable) iff it is determinant liftable (resp.\ weakly determinant liftable). As an application we show that each $J_{2,1}$ domain (as defined by Lorenzini) is an elementary divisor domain.

math.AC↗

arXiv2024

Matrix invertible extensions over commutative rings. Part I: general theory

A unimodular $2\times 2$ matrix with entries in a commutative $R$ is called extendable (resp.\ simply extendable) if it extends to an invertible $3\times 3$ matrix (resp.\ invertible $3\times 3$ matrix whose $(3,3)$ entry is $0$). We obtain necessary and sufficient conditions for a unimodular $2\times 2$ matrix to be extendable (resp.\ simply extendable) and use them to study the class $E_2$ (resp.\ $SE_2$) of rings $R$ with the property that all unimodular $2\times 2$ matrices with entries in $R$ are extendable (resp.\ simply extendable). We also study the larger class $Π_2$ of rings $R$ with the property that all unimodular $2\times 2$ matrices of determinant $0$ and with entries in $R$ are (simply) extendable (e.g., rings with trivial Picard groups or pre-Schreier domains). Among Dedekind domains, polynomial rings over $\mathbb Z$ and Hermite rings, only the EDRs belong to the class $E_2$ or $SE_2$. If $as(R)\le 2$, then $R$ is an $E_2$ ring iff it is an $SE_2$ ring.

math.AC↗

arXiv2024

On matrix invertible extensions over commutative rings

We introduce the class E2 (resp. SE2) of commutative rings R with the property that each unimodular 2 x 2 matrix with entries in R extends to an invertible 3 x 3 matrix (resp. invertible 3 x 3 matrix whose (3, 3) entry is 0). Among noetherian domains of dimension 1, polynomial rings over Z or Hermite rings, only EDRs belong to the class. Using this, stable ranges, and units and projective modules interpretations, we reobtain (often refine) criteria due to Kaplansky, McGovern, Roitman, Shchedryk, Wiegand and obtain new criteria for a Hermite ring to be an EDR. For instance, we characterize Hermite rings which are EDRs by (1) means of equations involving unimodular triples and (2) surjectivity of some maps involving units of factor rings by principal ideals. We use these criteria to show that each Bezout ring R that is either a J2,1 domain or an (SU)2 ring (as introduced by Lorenzini) such that for each nonzero a 2 R there exists no nontrivial self-dual projective R/Ra-module of rank 1 generated by 2 elements (e.g., all its elements are squares), is an EDR, thus solving or partially solving problems raised by Lorenzini. Many other classes of rings are introduced and studied. To ease the reading, this version concentrates only on extendability properties of unimodular 2 x 2 matrices and hence does not consider the case n > 2.

math.AC↗

arXiv2022

On stable range one matrices

For 2 by 2 matrices over commutative rings, we prove a characterization theorem for left stable range 1 elements, we show that the stable range 1 property is left-right symmetric (also) at element level, we show that all matrices with one zero row (or zero column) over Bezout rings have stable range 1. Using diagonal reduction, we characterize all the 2 by 2 integral matrices which have stable range 1 and discuss additional properties including Jacobson Lemma for stable range 1 elements. Finally, we give an example of exchange stable range 1 integral 2 by 2 matrix which is not clean.

math.RA↗

arXiv2022

On idempotent stable range one matrices

We characterize the idempotent stable range one $2\times 2$ matrices over commutative rings and in particular, the integral matrices with this property. Several special cases and examples complete the subject.

math.RA↗