arXiv subjects

Huan Liu

Publications and source records attributed to Huan Liu.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Do Large Language Models Know What They Don't Know II? A Fully Behavioral, Non-Cognitive Measure of Epistemic Honesty

Large Language Models (LLMs) are frequently confident, eloquent, and well versed. A natural question arises: do they know what they don't know? To answer this question, we borrow the concept of epistemic honesty and develop a novel metric to systematically evaluate whether an LLM appropriately acknowledges the boundaries of its knowledge. In this work, we introduce the Epistemic Honesty Quotient (EHQ), which reports three observable sub-scores across two operational axes (epistemic restraint and substantive-answer calibration), and construct EHQ-3000, a 3,000-question benchmark spanning Fabricated Entity, Post-Cutoff Event, Hyper-Niche True, and Context-Conditioned Questions. From a frozen registry of 21 model API routes, 15 completed the protocol after endpoint and eligibility checks; 14 entered the confirmatory analysis because severe provider-side truncation made one route's score indeterminate. The study reveals substantial variation across models, including a difference that can not be explained by their capability to extract explicitly available information. Composite EHQ ranges from 0.31 to 0.81 across the analysed panel, despite near-ceiling performance on the document-grounded capability probe. The two restraint criteria overlap strongly under the present category composition, whereas substantive-answer calibration varies across models and does not reliably co-vary with restraint; however, the small panel leaves substantial uncertainty. Thus, EHQ reveals behavioral differences that are not visible to conventional correctness-based assessment, while also showing why dataset composition, provider behavior, and confidence elicitation must remain part of the interpretation.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Dynamic Heterogeneous Graph Representation Learning: A Survey

Graph representation learning (GRL) serves as a canonical paradigm for modeling complex networks. However, real-world AI systems inherently manifest as evolving heterogeneous entities with complex interactions, posing significant challenges to static or homogeneous modeling. To address these complexities, representation learning for Dynamic Heterogeneous Graphs (DHGs) has emerged as a vital approach for learning low-dimensional representations that simultaneously preserve structural semantics and temporal dynamics. This survey presents the first systematic review of DHG representation learning methods. We first introduce a unified formal definition that encompasses both discrete-time and continuous-time DHGs from the perspective of temporal granularity. Building upon this formulation, we propose a novel algorithm-centric taxonomy that categorizes existing literature, including early embedding-based approaches, graph neural network (GNN)-based models, and relatively recent Transformer-based DHG methods, while explicitly highlighting their intrinsic modeling biases with respect to dynamic granularity. Furthermore, we summarize representative applications of DHG representation learning, along with commonly used datasets and benchmarks. Finally, we discuss promising research directions that guide future advances in this rapidly evolving field.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

MUGEN: Generating Unlearnable Graph Examples for Multiple Learning Tasks

Graph data across diverse domains can expose valuable relational information to unauthorized representation learning, creating a pressing need for protection against such misuse. Unlearnable examples offer a data-level defense by perturbing a training release so that models trained on it fail to generalize to clean data. Existing methods generate unlearnable graph examples for only a specified downstream task. Consequently, a release protected against one task may remain learnable for other plausible uses, including node classification, graph classification, and link prediction, which the data owner cannot anticipate. We introduce MUGEN, to our knowledge the first framework for generating unlearnable graph examples that jointly protect all enabled tasks. From one clean dataset, MUGEN produces a single feature-perturbed release that protects every enabled task through a shared GNN encoder and task-specific heads. We devise a Task-Aligned Separability Objective (TASO), which leverages task prediction and classwise separability to strengthen unlearnability and its transfer across GNN backbones and enabled tasks. We further introduce Type-Adaptive Perturbation (TAP), which tailors perturbation optimization to node-attribute type, with direct search over feasible hard flips that accept only loss-improving updates for discrete node attributes and customized gradient-based updates for continuous node features, thereby enabling strong unlearnability across both settings. Experiments across five benchmarks, four backends and three learning paradigms demonstrate that MUGEN generates transferable unlearnable graph examples across GNN backbones and all three tasks, and remains effective under adversarial training and data augmentation.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Measuring Reasoning Quality in LLMs: A Multi-Dimensional Behavioral Framework

Despite remarkable progress on reasoning benchmarks, current LLM evaluation practice remains anchored to final-answer correctness, providing limited insight into how models reason, how reliably they behave under contextual variation, or how efficiently they reach conclusions. This paper proposes a unified multi-dimensional framework for measuring LLM reasoning quality from a behavioral perspective, operationalizing six theoretically grounded dimensions rooted in cognitive science: Correctness (CQ), Consistency (CS), Robustness (RS), Local Logical Coherence (LS), Efficiency (ES), and Stability (SS). The framework introduces deployment-aware aggregation, enabling context-specific model selection beyond accuracy-based leaderboards. Experiments across multiple LLMs and benchmarks reveal behaviors systematically concealed by single-metric evaluation, including the orthogonality of local logical coherence and correctness, deployment-context-dependent ranking inversions, and non-trivial dimensional profiles in small locally-deployed models. Discriminant validity analysis confirms that the proposed dimensions capture largely non-redundant signals. The resulting pipeline provides a foundation for diagnosing LLM reasoning behavior across deployment contexts, with domain-specific validation as a direction for future work.

cs.AI↗