SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Hugo Roger Paz

Publications and source records attributed to Hugo Roger Paz.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Early Academic Capital as the Causal Origin of Dropout in Constrained Educational Systems -- Evidence from Longitudinal Data and Structural Causal Models

Dropout in higher education is commonly analysed through observable academic events such as course failure or repetition. However, these event-based perspectives may obscure the underlying structural dynamics that shape student trajectories. In this study, we adopt a causal computational social science approach to identify the origins of dropout in a constrained engineering curriculum. Using longitudinal administrative data from 16,868 students who survived to their second active term, and a leakage-free panel design, we estimate the causal effect of early academic capital accumulation on three-year dropout. Treatment is defined as low early progress (passing at most 1 subject by the end of the second term). We employ G-estimation of structural nested mean models, complemented by marginal structural models with inverse probability weighting. We find a large and robust causal effect: low early academic capital increases dropout probability by 25.3 percentage points (G-estimation), closely matched by a 27.4 pp estimate from IPTW models. This effect is approximately twice as large as the estimated direct impact of later academic events such as first-time gateway-course repetition (12.7 pp). These findings suggest that dropout does not originate in isolated academic failures, but in early trajectory misalignment between academic progress and system-imposed temporal constraints. This perspective shifts the focus of intervention from downstream events to early-stage trajectory formation.

cs.CY

From Educational Analytics to AI Governance: Transferable Lessons from Complex Systems Interventions

Both student retention in higher education and artificial intelligence governance face a common structural challenge: the application of linear regulatory frameworks to complex adaptive systems. Risk-based approaches dominate both domains, yet systematically fail because they assume stable causal pathways, predictable actor responses, and controllable system boundaries. This paper extracts transferable methodological principles from CAPIRE (Curriculum, Archetypes, Policies, Interventions & Research Environment), an empirically validated framework for educational analytics that treats student dropout as an emergent property of curricular structures, institutional rules, and macroeconomic shocks. Drawing on longitudinal data from engineering programmes and causal inference methods, CAPIRE demonstrates that well-intentioned interventions routinely generate unintended consequences when system complexity is ignored. We argue that five core principles developed within CAPIRE - temporal observation discipline, structural mapping over categorical classification, archetype-based heterogeneity analysis, causal mechanism identification, and simulation-based policy design - transfer directly to the challenge of governing AI systems. The isomorphism is not merely analogical: both domains exhibit non-linearity, emergence, feedback loops, strategic adaptation, and path dependence. We propose Complex Systems AI Governance (CSAIG) as an integrated framework that operationalises these principles for regulatory design, shifting the central question from "how risky is this AI system?" to "how does this intervention reshape system dynamics?" The contribution is twofold: demonstrating that empirical lessons from one complex systems domain can accelerate governance design in another, and offering a concrete methodological architecture for complexity-aware AI regulation.

cs.CY

From Linear Risk to Emergent Harm: Complexity as the Missing Core of AI Governance

Risk-based AI regulation has become the dominant paradigm in AI governance, promising proportional controls aligned with anticipated harms. This paper argues that such frameworks often fail for structural reasons: they implicitly assume linear causality, stable system boundaries, and largely predictable responses to regulation. In practice, AI operates within complex adaptive socio-technical systems in which harm is frequently emergent, delayed, redistributed, and amplified through feedback loops and strategic adaptation by system actors. As a result, compliance can increase while harm is displaced or concealed rather than eliminated. We propose a complexity-based framework for AI governance that treats regulation as intervention rather than control, prioritises dynamic system mapping over static classifications, and integrates causal reasoning and simulation for policy design under uncertainty. The aim is not to eliminate uncertainty, but to enable robust system stewardship through monitoring, learning, and iterative revision of governance interventions.

cs.CY

The AI Tutor in Engineering Education: Design, Results, and Redesign of an Experience in Hydrology at an Argentine University

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has reshaped higher education, presenting both opportunities and ethical-pedagogical challenges. This article presents an empirical case study on the complete cycle (design, initial failure, redesign, and re-evaluation) of an intervention using an AI Tutor (ChatGPT) in the "Hydrology and Hydraulic Works" course (Civil Engineering, UTN-FRT, Argentina). The study documents two interventions in the same cohort (n=23). The first resulted in widespread failure (0% pass rate) due to superficial use and serious academic integrity issues (65% similarity, copies > 80%). This failure forced a comprehensive methodological redesign. The second intervention, based on a redesigned prompt (Prompt V2) with strict evidence controls (mandatory Appendix A with exported chat, minimum time $\geq$ 120 minutes, verifiable numerical exercise) and a refined rubric (Rubric V2), showed significantly better results: a median score of 88/100 and verifiable compliance with genuine interaction processes. Using a mixed-methods approach (reproducible document analysis and rubric analysis), the impact of the redesign on integrity and technical performance is evaluated. The results demonstrate that, without explicit process controls, students prioritize efficiency over deep learning, submitting documents without real traceability. A transferable assessment protocol for STEM courses is proposed, centered on "auditable personal zones," to foster higher-order thinking. The study provides key empirical evidence from the context of a public Latin American university.

cs.CY

Hybrid Instructor Ai Assessment In Academic Projects: Efficiency, Equity, And Methodological Lessons

In technical subjects characterized by high enrollment, such as Basic Hydraulics, the assessment of reports necessitates superior levels of objectivity, consistency, and formative feedback; goals often compromised by faculty workload. This study presents the implementation of a generative artificial intelligence (AI) assisted assessment system, supervised by instructors, to grade 33 hydraulics reports. The central objective was to quantify its impact on the efficiency, quality, and fairness of the process. The employed methodology included the calibration of the Large Language Model (LLM) with a detailed rubric, the batch processing of assignments, and a human-in-the-loop validation phase. The quantitative results revealed a noteworthy 88% reduction in grading time (from 50 to 6 minutes per report, including verification) and a 733% increase in productivity. The quality of feedback was substantially improved, evidenced by 100% rubric coverage and a 150% increase in the anchoring of comments to textual evidence. The system proved to be equitable, exhibiting no bias related to report length, and highly reliable post-calibration (r = 0.96 between scores). It is concluded that the hybrid AI-instructor model optimizes the assessment process, thereby liberating time for high-value pedagogical tasks and enhancing the fairness and quality of feedback, in alignment with UNESCO's principles on the ethical use of AI in education.

cs.CY

College Dropout Factors: An Analysis with LightGBM and Shapley's Cooperative Game Theory

This study was based on data analysis of academic histories of civil engineering students at FACET-UNT. Our main objective was to determine the academic performance variables that have a significant impact on the dropout of the career. To do this, we implemented a correlation model using LightGBM (Barbier et al., 2016; Ke et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2022). We use this model to identify the key variables that influence the probability of student dropout. In addition, we use game theory to interpret the results obtained. Specifically, we use the SHAP library (Lundberg et al., 2018, 2020; Lundberg & Lee, 2017) in Python to calculate the Shapley numbers. The results of our study revealed the most important variables that influence the dropout from the civil engineering career. Significant differences were identified in terms of age, time spent in studies, and academic performance, which includes the number of courses passed and the number of exams taken. These results may be useful to develop more effective student retention strategies and improve academic success in this discipline.

cs.CY

Causal Analysis of First-Year Course Approval Delays in an Engineering Major Through Inference Techniques

The study addresses the problem of delays in the approval of first-year courses in the Civil Engineering Major at the National University of Tucum\'an, Argentina. Students take an average of 5 years to pass these subjects. Using the DoWhy and Causal Discovery Toolbox tools, we looked to identify the underlying causes of these delays. The analysis revealed that the regulatory structure of the program and the evaluation methods play a crucial role in this delay. Specifically, the accumulation of regular subjects without passing a final exam was identified as a key factor. These findings can guide interventions to improve student success rates and the effectiveness of the education system in general.

cs.CY