arXiv subjects

HyeYun Park

Publications and source records attributed to HyeYun Park.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Rubin M1M3 Dynamic performance : stability and actuation during operations

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory is preparing to commence the Legacy Survey of Space and Time with the fully integrated Simonyi Survey Telescope. To verify that the primary/tertiary (M1M3) mirror system is ready to meet the demanding survey requirements, dynamic tests of the 8.4 m, 53 ton M1M3 system were conducted to assess safety, stability, and image quality under realistic operating conditions. The M1M3 is supported by 156 pneumatic force actuators and positioned, relative to its mirror cell, by six hardpoint actuators that together must counteract gravitational and inertial loads during rapid telescope motion. The Rubin Observatory telescope mount is capable of moving at a rate that meets its nominal motion requirements, and can approach it maximum allowable values that are 50 percent higher. Even at just 20 % of its operational speed, it is an exceptionally fast motion for such a large structure. After slewing, the system must stabilize and dampen vibrations within 5 seconds to ensure image quality during observations. Achieving this rapid settling requires precise control of 156 force actuators, which must adjust dynamically with changes in telescope elevation to compensate for gravity effects. We present results for M1M3 from a comprehensive series of TMA dynamical tests spanning the operational envelope of slew velocities and accelerations. The analysis evaluates elevation axis balancing and lookup table updating as we install the M1M3 mirror; slew-and-settle behavior, force response and stability of the pneumatic actuator system across telescope attitudes including responses to the earthquake. The results demonstrate the readiness of the M1M3 subsystem for routine survey operations and provide validation data for ongoing performance modeling.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2021

The LSST DESC DC2 Simulated Sky Survey

We describe the simulated sky survey underlying the second data challenge (DC2) carried out in preparation for analysis of the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) by the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (LSST DESC). Significant connections across multiple science domains will be a hallmark of LSST; the DC2 program represents a unique modeling effort that stresses this interconnectivity in a way that has not been attempted before. This effort encompasses a full end-to-end approach: starting from a large N-body simulation, through setting up LSST-like observations including realistic cadences, through image simulations, and finally processing with Rubin's LSST Science Pipelines. This last step ensures that we generate data products resembling those to be delivered by the Rubin Observatory as closely as is currently possible. The simulated DC2 sky survey covers six optical bands in a wide-fast-deep (WFD) area of approximately 300 deg^2 as well as a deep drilling field (DDF) of approximately 1 deg^2. We simulate 5 years of the planned 10-year survey. The DC2 sky survey has multiple purposes. First, the LSST DESC working groups can use the dataset to develop a range of DESC analysis pipelines to prepare for the advent of actual data. Second, it serves as a realistic testbed for the image processing software under development for LSST by the Rubin Observatory. In particular, simulated data provide a controlled way to investigate certain image-level systematic effects. Finally, the DC2 sky survey enables the exploration of new scientific ideas in both static and time-domain cosmology.

astro-ph.IM↗

arXiv2020

MAORY AO performances

The Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY (MAORY) should provide 30% SR in K band (50% goal) on half of the sky at the South Galactic Pole. Assessing its performance and the sensitivity to parameter variations during the design phase is a fundamental step for the engineering of such a complex system. This step, centered on numerical simulations, is the connection between the performance requirements and the Adaptive Optics system configuration. In this work we present MAORY configuration and performance and we justify theAdaptive Optics system design choices.

astro-ph.IM↗