arXiv subjects

Hyungyu Shin

Publications and source records attributed to Hyungyu Shin.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2025

Mind the Blind Spots: A Focus-Level Evaluation Framework for LLM Reviews

Peer review underpins scientific progress, but it is increasingly strained by reviewer shortages and growing workloads. Large Language Models (LLMs) can automatically draft reviews now, but determining whether LLM-generated reviews are trustworthy requires systematic evaluation. Researchers have evaluated LLM reviews at either surface-level (e.g., BLEU and ROUGE) or content-level (e.g., specificity and factual accuracy). Yet it remains uncertain whether LLM-generated reviews attend to the same critical facets that human experts weigh -- the strengths and weaknesses that ultimately drive an accept-or-reject decision. We introduce a focus-level evaluation framework that operationalizes the focus as a normalized distribution of attention across predefined facets in paper reviews. Based on the framework, we developed an automatic focus-level evaluation pipeline based on two sets of facets: target (e.g., problem, method, and experiment) and aspect (e.g., validity, clarity, and novelty), leveraging 676 paper reviews (https://figshare.com/s/d5adf26c802527dd0f62) from OpenReview that consists of 3,657 strengths and weaknesses identified from human experts. The comparison of focus distributions between LLMs and human experts showed that the off-the-shelf LLMs consistently have a more biased focus towards examining technical validity while significantly overlooking novelty assessment when criticizing papers.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2025

PANORAMA: A Dataset and Benchmarks Capturing Decision Trails and Rationales in Patent Examination

Patent examination remains an ongoing challenge in the NLP literature even after the advent of large language models (LLMs), as it requires an extensive yet nuanced human judgment on whether a submitted claim meets the statutory standards of novelty and non-obviousness against previously granted claims -- prior art -- in expert domains. Previous NLP studies have approached this challenge as a prediction task (e.g., forecasting grant outcomes) with high-level proxies such as similarity metrics or classifiers trained on historical labels. However, this approach often overlooks the step-by-step evaluations that examiners must make with profound information, including rationales for the decisions provided in office actions documents, which also makes it harder to measure the current state of techniques in patent review processes. To fill this gap, we construct PANORAMA, a dataset of 8,143 U.S. patent examination records that preserves the full decision trails, including original applications, all cited references, Non-Final Rejections, and Notices of Allowance. Also, PANORAMA decomposes the trails into sequential benchmarks that emulate patent professionals' patent review processes and allow researchers to examine large language models' capabilities at each step of them. Our findings indicate that, although LLMs are relatively effective at retrieving relevant prior art and pinpointing the pertinent paragraphs, they struggle to assess the novelty and non-obviousness of patent claims. We discuss these results and argue that advancing NLP, including LLMs, in the patent domain requires a deeper understanding of real-world patent examination. Our dataset is openly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/LG-AI-Research/PANORAMA.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2024

AINeedsPlanner: A Workbook to Support Effective Collaboration Between AI Experts and Clients

Clients often partner with AI experts to develop AI applications tailored to their needs. In these partnerships, careful planning and clear communication are critical, as inaccurate or incomplete specifications can result in misaligned model characteristics, expensive reworks, and potential friction between collaborators. Unfortunately, given the complexity of requirements ranging from functionality, data, and governance, effective guidelines for collaborative specification of requirements in client-AI expert collaborations are missing. In this work, we introduce AINeedsPlanner, a workbook that AI experts and clients can use to facilitate effective interchange and clear specifications. The workbook is based on (1) an interview of 10 completed AI application project teams, which identifies and characterizes steps in AI application planning and (2) a study with 12 AI experts, which defines a taxonomy of AI experts' information needs and dimensions that affect the information needs. Finally, we demonstrate the workbook's utility with two case studies in real-world settings.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2024

Teach AI How to Code: Using Large Language Models as Teachable Agents for Programming Education

This work investigates large language models (LLMs) as teachable agents for learning by teaching (LBT). LBT with teachable agents helps learners identify knowledge gaps and discover new knowledge. However, teachable agents require expensive programming of subject-specific knowledge. While LLMs as teachable agents can reduce the cost, LLMs' expansive knowledge as tutees discourages learners from teaching. We propose a prompting pipeline that restrains LLMs' knowledge and makes them initiate "why" and "how" questions for effective knowledge-building. We combined these techniques into TeachYou, an LBT environment for algorithm learning, and AlgoBo, an LLM-based tutee chatbot that can simulate misconceptions and unawareness prescribed in its knowledge state. Our technical evaluation confirmed that our prompting pipeline can effectively configure AlgoBo's problem-solving performance. Through a between-subject study with 40 algorithm novices, we also observed that AlgoBo's questions led to knowledge-dense conversations (effect size=0.71). Lastly, we discuss design implications, cost-efficiency, and personalization of LLM-based teachable agents.

cs.HC↗

arXiv2015

Taming Subgraph Isomorphism for RDF Query Processing

RDF data are used to model knowledge in various areas such as life sciences, Semantic Web, bioinformatics, and social graphs. The size of real RDF data reaches billions of triples. This calls for a framework for efficiently processing RDF data. The core function of processing RDF data is subgraph pattern matching. There have been two completely different directions for supporting efficient subgraph pattern matching. One direction is to develop specialized RDF query processing engines exploiting the properties of RDF data for the last decade, while the other direction is to develop efficient subgraph isomorphism algorithms for general, labeled graphs for over 30 years. Although both directions have a similar goal (i.e., finding subgraphs in data graphs for a given query graph), they have been independently researched without clear reason. We argue that a subgraph isomorphism algorithm can be easily modified to handle the graph homomorphism, which is the RDF pattern matching semantics, by just removing the injectivity constraint. In this paper, based on the state-of-the-art subgraph isomorphism algorithm, we propose an in-memory solution, TurboHOM++, which is tamed for the RDF processing, and we compare it with the representative RDF processing engines for several RDF benchmarks in a server machine where billions of triples can be loaded in memory. In order to speed up TurboHOM++, we also provide a simple yet effective transformation and a series of optimization techniques. Extensive experiments using several RDF benchmarks show that TurboHOM++ consistently and significantly outperforms the representative RDF engines. Specifically, TurboHOM++ outperforms its competitors by up to five orders of magnitude.

cs.DB↗