SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Iain Dove

Publications and source records attributed to Iain Dove.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The appeal of the gamma family distribution to protect the confidentiality of contingency tables

Administrative databases, such as the English School Census (ESC), are rich sources of information that are potentially useful for researchers. For such data sources to be made available, however, strict guarantees of privacy would be required. To achieve this, synthetic data methods can be used. Such methods, when protecting the confidentiality of tabular data (contingency tables), often utilise the Poisson or Poisson-mixture distributions, such as the negative binomial (NBI). These distributions, however, are either equidispersed (in the case of the Poisson) or overdispersed (e.g. in the case of the NBI), which results in excessive noise being applied to large low-risk counts. This paper proposes the use of the (discretized) gamma family (GAF) distribution, which allows noise to be applied in a more bespoke fashion. Specifically, it allows less noise to be applied as cell counts become larger, providing an optimal balance in relation to the risk-utility trade-off. We illustrate the suitability of the GAF distribution on an administrative-type data set that is reminiscent of the ESC.

stat.ME

Obtaining $(\epsilon,\delta)$-differential privacy guarantees when using a Poisson mechanism to synthesize contingency tables

We show that differential privacy type guarantees can be obtained when using a Poisson synthesis mechanism to protect counts in contingency tables. Specifically, we show how to obtain $(\epsilon, \delta)$-probabilistic differential privacy guarantees via the Poisson distribution's cumulative distribution function. We demonstrate this empirically with the synthesis of an administrative-type confidential database.

cs.CR

Using saturated count models for user-friendly synthesis of categorical data

Over the past three decades, synthetic data methods for statistical disclosure control have continually evolved, but mainly within the domain of survey data sets. There are certain characteristics of administrative databases, such as their size, which present challenges from a synthesis perspective and require special attention. This paper, through the fitting of saturated count models, presents a synthesis method that is suitable for administrative databases that is tuned by two parameters. The method allows large categorical data sets to be synthesized quickly and allows risk and utility metrics to be satisfied a priori, that is, prior to synthetic data generation. The paper explores how the flexibility afforded by two-parameter count models (the negative binomial and Poisson-inverse Gaussian) can be utilised to protect respondents' - especially uniques' - privacy in synthetic data. Finally, an empirical example is carried out through the synthesis of a database which can be viewed as a good substitute to the English School Census.

stat.ME

On integrating the number of synthetic data sets $m$ into the 'a priori' synthesis approach

Until recently, multiple synthetic data sets were always released to analysts, to allow valid inferences to be obtained. However, under certain conditions - including when saturated count models are used to synthesize categorical data - single imputation ($m=1$) is sufficient. Nevertheless, increasing $m$ causes utility to improve, but at the expense of higher risk, an example of the risk-utility trade-off. The question, therefore, is: which value of $m$ is optimal with respect to the risk-utility trade-off? Moreover, the paper considers two ways of analysing categorical data sets: as they have a contingency table representation, multiple categorical data sets can be averaged before being analysed, as opposed to the usual way of averaging post-analysis. This paper also introduces a pair of metrics, $τ_3(k,d)$ and $τ_4(k,d)$, that are suited for assessing disclosure risk in multiple categorical synthetic data sets. Finally, the synthesis methods are demonstrated empirically.

stat.ME