Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Iakovi Alexiou

Publications and source records attributed to Iakovi Alexiou.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Scalable Audio-LLM System for Speech MOS Evaluation: A Diagnostic Case Study and Adaptation Roadmap

The continuous deployment of enterprise voice systems creates a critical operational bottleneck: evaluating the acoustic quality of synthetic speech across high-volume production updates. While human Mean Opinion Score (MOS) remains the quality gold standard, it introduces severe operational costs and turn-around delays that make continuous integration infeasible. In this work, we present a system design case study for a scalable, low-cost and offline evaluation pipeline capable of scoring large batches of synthetic speech at marginal cost. First, we use Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct in a zero-shot setting for granular MOS estimation, noticing perceptual blind spots and inherent biases. Then, we analyze SOMOS dataset and construct a diagnostic benchmark that operationalizes two prosodic dimensions associated with human naturalness ratings. Finally, we adapt Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct through a parameter-efficient finetuning (LoRA) on the task of MOS evaluation, observing improvements over base model and widely used neural baselines like UTMOS and establishing a practical blueprint for enterprise-grade speech quality assurance.

cs.SD↗

MambaRate: Speech Quality Assessment Across Different Sampling Rates

We propose MambaRate, which predicts Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) with limited bias regarding the sampling rate of the waveform under evaluation. It is designed for Track 3 of the AudioMOS Challenge 2025, which focuses on predicting MOS for speech in high sampling frequencies. Our model leverages self-supervised embeddings and selective state space modeling. The target ratings are encoded in a continuous representation via Gaussian radial basis functions (RBF). The results of the challenge were based on the system-level Spearman's Rank Correllation Coefficient (SRCC) metric. An initial MambaRate version (T16 system) outperformed the pre-trained baseline (B03) by ~14% in a few-shot setting without pre-training. T16 ranked fourth out of five in the challenge, differing by ~6% from the winning system. We present additional results on the BVCC dataset as well as ablations with different representations as input, which outperform the initial T16 version.

cs.SD↗