arXiv subjects

Ian Hincks

Publications and source records attributed to Ian Hincks.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Sampling hard circuits with verifiably high fidelity

Sampling-based proposals are prominent candidates for demonstrating quantum computations beyond the reach of classical supercomputers. However, it has been difficult to combine their complexity-theoretic hardness with two capabilities needed for scalable quantum computing more generally: suppressing hardware errors, and verifying the quantum computation itself. Here we address both issues by introducing structured circuits, which, in addition to provable hardness guarantees, admit an encoding in a quantum code. This allows us to simultaneously reach high fidelities at high circuit depths, and to certify an experimental fidelity via the circuit structure and measurement of code syndromes. The resulting certificate is device dependent, but requires substantially weaker noise assumptions than existing fidelity proxy benchmarks. We demonstrate our proposal with a $64$-qubit, depth-$73$ Clifford circuit, doped with $314$ $T$ gates. We use a total of $76$ physical qubits to encode this computation in spacetime codes, effectively suppressing gate error rates by $10\times$ after syndrome post-selection, and yielding a state with a fidelity lower bound of $0.349$ with $95\%$ confidence. Our construction is a systematic method for promoting a stabilizer state to a magic state while keeping an error-detected fidelity certificate.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Observable Estimation in the Absence of Classical Verification

The predictive success of quantum mechanics underpins many areas of modern science, even as the exact simulation of large, interacting quantum systems remains beyond the reach of classical computation. This success has been enabled by the remarkable advancement of scalable numerical approximation methods, which often demonstrate practical accuracy despite the absence of formal guarantees. As quantum simulation pushes into regimes where these approximations struggle, a fundamental challenge arises: How can quantum outcomes be trusted when reliable classical benchmarks are unavailable? Here, we establish a framework for the independent validation of quantum estimates in this setting and present evidence that they provide the most credible result among several considered methods, in the absence of an immediately accessible ground-truth solution. We apply our framework to the semi-scrambling dynamics of a physical model that strains several leading classical simulation methods yet remains experimentally accessible, in part through our introduction of the \textit{operator Loschmidt echo}. We systematically design a series of experiments using quantum heuristics that, taken together, test the underlying assumptions and provide strong confidence in the observable estimates obtained from the quantum computer. We then show how this framework can be extended to place accuracy bounds on quantum estimates via careful characterization and manipulation of the device noise, transforming the problem of validating the observable estimation to validating the noise model. These results establish a route towards trusted quantum computation for scientific discovery, independent of classical verification.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Reference Architecture of a Quantum-Centric Supercomputer

Quantum computers have demonstrated utility in simulating quantum systems beyond brute-force classical approaches. As the community builds on these demonstrations to explore using quantum computing for applied research, algorithms and workflows have emerged that require leveraging both quantum computers and classical high-performance computing (HPC) systems to scale applications, especially in chemistry and materials, beyond what either system can simulate alone. Today, these disparate systems operate in isolation, forcing users to manually orchestrate workloads, coordinate job scheduling, and transfer data between systems -- a cumbersome process that hinders productivity and severely limits rapid algorithmic exploration. These challenges motivate the need for flexible and high-performance Quantum-Centric Supercomputing (QCSC) systems that integrate Quantum Processing Units (QPUs), Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), and Central Processing Units (CPUs) to accelerate discovery of such algorithms across applications. These systems will be co-designed across quantum and classical HPC infrastructure, middleware, and application layers to accelerate the adoption of quantum computing for solving critical computational problems. We envision QCSC evolution through three distinct phases: (1) quantum systems as specialized compute offload engines within existing HPC complexes; (2) heterogeneous quantum and classical HPC systems coupled through advanced middleware, enabling seamless execution of hybrid quantum-classical algorithms; and (3) fully co-designed heterogeneous quantum-HPC systems for hybrid computational workflows. This article presents a reference architecture and roadmap for these QCSC systems.

cs.ET↗

arXiv2023

Benchmarking Quantum Processor Performance at Scale

As quantum processors grow, new performance benchmarks are required to capture the full quality of the devices at scale. While quantum volume is an excellent benchmark, it focuses on the highest quality subset of the device and so is unable to indicate the average performance over a large number of connected qubits. Furthermore, it is a discrete pass/fail and so is not reflective of continuous improvements in hardware nor does it provide quantitative direction to large-scale algorithms. For example, there may be value in error mitigated Hamiltonian simulation at scale with devices unable to pass strict quantum volume tests. Here we discuss a scalable benchmark which measures the fidelity of a connecting set of two-qubit gates over $N$ qubits by measuring gate errors using simultaneous direct randomized benchmarking in disjoint layers. Our layer fidelity can be easily related to algorithmic run time, via $γ$ defined in Ref.\cite{berg2022probabilistic} that can be used to estimate the number of circuits required for error mitigation. The protocol is efficient and obtains all the pair rates in the layered structure. Compared to regular (isolated) RB this approach is sensitive to crosstalk. As an example we measure a $N=80~(100)$ qubit layer fidelity on a 127 qubit fixed-coupling "Eagle" processor (ibm\_sherbrooke) of 0.26(0.19) and on the 133 qubit tunable-coupling "Heron" processor (ibm\_montecarlo) of 0.61(0.26). This can easily be expressed as a layer size independent quantity, error per layered gate (EPLG), which is here $1.7\times10^{-2}(1.7\times10^{-2})$ for ibm\_sherbrooke and $6.2\times10^{-3}(1.2\times10^{-2})$ for ibm\_montecarlo.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2023

The Error Reconstruction and Compiled Calibration of Quantum Computing Cycles

Quantum computers are inhibited by physical errors that occur during computation. For this reason, the development of increasingly sophisticated error characterization and error suppression techniques is central to the progress of quantum computing. Error distributions are considerably influenced by the precise gate scheduling across the entire quantum processing unit. To account for this holistic feature, we may ascribe each error profile to a (clock) cycle, which is a scheduled list of instructions over an arbitrarily large fraction of the chip. A celebrated technique known as randomized compiling introduces some randomness within cycles' instructions, which yields effective cycles with simpler, stochastic error profiles. In the present work, we leverage the structure of cycle benchmarking (CB) circuits as well as known Pauli channel estimation techniques to derive a method, which we refer to as cycle error reconstruction (CER), to estimate with multiplicative precision the marginal error distribution associated with any effective cycle of interest. The CER protocol is designed to scale for an arbitrarily large number of qubits. Furthermore, we develop a fast compilation-based calibration method, referred to as stochastic calibration (SC), to identify and suppress local coherent error sources occurring in any effective cycle of interest. We performed both protocols on IBM-Q 5-qubit devices. Via our calibration scheme, we obtained up to a 5-fold improvement of the circuit performance.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2022

Concepts and conditions for error suppression through randomized compiling

Randomized compiling reduces the effects of errors on quantum computers by tailoring arbitrary Markovian errors into stochastic Pauli noise. Here we prove that randomized compiling also tailors non-Markovian errors into local stochastic Pauli noise and investigate the technique's limitations. We show through analysis and numerical results that randomized compiling alters errors in three distinct helpful ways. First, it prevents the coherent accumulation of errors (including hard to remove crosstalk effects) across gate cycles by destroying intercycle coherent correlations. Second, it converts individual gate cycle errors into Pauli noise. Finally, randomized compiling reduces the variability inherent to noisy devices. We confirm these theoretical predictions with the IBM Quantum Experience platform and describe experimental data that illustrates a drastic performance improvement across public devices. These results cement the importance of randomized compiling in near- and long-term quantum information processing.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Independent State and Measurement Characterization for Quantum Computers

Correctly characterizing state preparation and measurement (SPAM) processes is a necessary step towards building reliable quantum processing units (QPUs). In this work, we discuss the subtleties behind separately measuring SPAM errors. We propose a protocol that can separately estimate SPAM errors, in the case where quantum gates are ideal. In the case where the quantum gates are imperfect, we derive bounds on the estimated SPAM error rates, based on gate error measures which can be estimated independently of SPAM processes. Our method shows that the gauge ambiguity in characterizing SPAM operations can be resolved, by assuming that there exists one qubit whose initial state is uncorrelated with other qubits in a QPU. We test the protocol on a publicly available five-qubit QPU and demonstrate its validity by comparing our results with simulations.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Leveraging Randomized Compiling for the QITE Algorithm

The success of the current generation of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware shows that quantum hardware may be able to tackle complex problems even without error correction. One outstanding issue is that of coherent errors arising from the increased complexity of these devices. These errors can accumulate through a circuit, making their impact on algorithms hard to predict and mitigate. Iterative algorithms like Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution are susceptible to these errors. This article presents the combination of both noise tailoring using Randomized Compiling and error mitigation with a purification. We also show that Cycle Benchmarking gives an estimate of the reliability of the purification. We apply this method to the Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution of a Transverse Field Ising Model and report an energy estimation and a ground state infidelity both below 1\%. Our methodology is general and can be used for other algorithms and platforms. We show how combining noise tailoring and error mitigation will push forward the performance of NISQ devices.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2021

Randomized compiling for scalable quantum computing on a noisy superconducting quantum processor

The successful implementation of algorithms on quantum processors relies on the accurate control of quantum bits (qubits) to perform logic gate operations. In this era of noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing, systematic miscalibrations, drift, and crosstalk in the control of qubits can lead to a coherent form of error which has no classical analog. Coherent errors severely limit the performance of quantum algorithms in an unpredictable manner, and mitigating their impact is necessary for realizing reliable quantum computations. Moreover, the average error rates measured by randomized benchmarking and related protocols are not sensitive to the full impact of coherent errors, and therefore do not reliably predict the global performance of quantum algorithms, leaving us unprepared to validate the accuracy of future large-scale quantum computations. Randomized compiling is a protocol designed to overcome these performance limitations by converting coherent errors into stochastic noise, dramatically reducing unpredictable errors in quantum algorithms and enabling accurate predictions of algorithmic performance from error rates measured via cycle benchmarking. In this work, we demonstrate significant performance gains under randomized compiling for the four-qubit quantum Fourier transform algorithm and for random circuits of variable depth on a superconducting quantum processor. Additionally, we accurately predict algorithm performance using experimentally-measured error rates. Our results demonstrate that randomized compiling can be utilized to leverage and predict the capabilities of modern-day noisy quantum processors, paving the way forward for scalable quantum computing.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2019

Statistical analysis of randomized benchmarking

Randomized benchmarking and variants thereof, which we collectively call RB+, are widely used to characterize the performance of quantum computers because they are simple, scalable, and robust to state-preparation and measurement errors. However, experimental implementations of RB+ allocate resources suboptimally and make ad-hoc assumptions that undermine the reliability of the data analysis. In this paper, we propose a simple modification of RB+ which rigorously eliminates a nuisance parameter and simplifies the experimental design. We then show that, with this modification and specific experimental choices, RB+ efficiently provides estimates of error rates with multiplicative precision. Finally, we provide a simplified rigorous method for obtaining credible regions for parameters of interest and a heuristic approximation for these intervals that performs well in currently relevant regimes.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2018

Hamiltonian Learning with Online Bayesian Experiment Design in Practice

Estimating parameters of quantum systems is usually done by performing a sequence of predetermined experiments and post-processing the resulting data. It is known that online design, where the choice of the next experiment is based on the most up-to-date knowledge about the system, can offer speedups to parameter estimation. We apply online Bayesian experiment design to a Nitrogen Vacancy (NV) in diamond to learn the values of a five-parameter model describing its Hamiltonian and decoherence process. Comparing this to standard pre-determined experiment sweeps, we find that we can achieve median posterior variances on some parameters that are between 10 and 100 times better given the same amount of data. This has applications to NV magnetometry where one of the Hamiltonian coefficients is the parameter of interest. Furthermore, the methods that we use are generic and can be adapted to any quantum device.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2018

Bayesian Inference for Randomized Benchmarking Protocols

Randomized benchmarking (RB) protocols are standard tools for characterizing quantum devices. Prior analyses of RB protocols have not provided a complete method for analyzing realistic data, resulting in a variety of ad-hoc methods. The main confounding factor in rigorously analyzing data from RB protocols is an unknown and noise-dependent distribution of survival probabilities over random sequences. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian method where these survival distributions are modeled as nonparametric Dirichlet process mixtures. Our method infers parameters of interest without additional assumptions about the underlying physical noise process. We show with numerical examples that our method works robustly for both standard and highly pathological error models. Our method also works reliably at low noise levels and with little data because we avoid the asymptotic assumptions of commonly used methods such as least-squares fitting. For example, our method produces a narrow and consistent posterior for the average gate fidelity from ten random sequences per sequence length in the standard RB protocol.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2017

Statistical Inference with Quantum Measurements: Methodologies for Nitrogen Vacancy Centers in Diamond

The analysis of photon count data from the standard nitrogen vacancy (NV) measurement process is treated as a statistical inference problem. This has applications toward gaining better and more rigorous error bars for tasks such as parameter estimation (eg. magnetometry), tomography, and randomized benchmarking. We start by providing a summary of the standard phenomenological model of the NV optical process in terms of Lindblad jump operators. This model is used to derive random variables describing emitted photons during measurement, to which finite visibility, dark counts, and imperfect state preparation are added. NV spin-state measurement is then stated as an abstract statistical inference problem consisting of an underlying biased coin obstructed by three Poisson rates. Relevant frequentist and Bayesian estimators are provided, discussed, and quantitatively compared. We show numerically that the risk of the maximum likelihood estimator is well approximated by the Cramer-Rao bound, for which we provide a simple formula. Of the estimators, we in particular promote the Bayes estimator, owing to its slightly better risk performance, and straight-forward error propagation into more complex experiments. This is illustrated on experimental data, where Quantum Hamiltonian Learning is performed and cross-validated in a fully Bayesian setting, and compared to a more traditional weighted least squares fit.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2017

QInfer: Statistical inference software for quantum applications

Characterizing quantum systems through experimental data is critical to applications as diverse as metrology and quantum computing. Analyzing this experimental data in a robust and reproducible manner is made challenging, however, by the lack of readily-available software for performing principled statistical analysis. We improve the robustness and reproducibility of characterization by introducing an open-source library, QInfer, to address this need. Our library makes it easy to analyze data from tomography, randomized benchmarking, and Hamiltonian learning experiments either in post-processing, or online as data is acquired. QInfer also provides functionality for predicting the performance of proposed experimental protocols from simulated runs. By delivering easy-to-use characterization tools based on principled statistical analysis, QInfer helps address many outstanding challenges facing quantum technology.

quant-ph↗