arXiv subjects

Ian Mertz

Publications and source records attributed to Ian Mertz.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Understanding Robust Catalytic Computing

Catalytic computing concerns space bounded computation which starts with memory full of data that have to be restored by the end of the computation. Lossy catalytic computing, defined by Gupta et al. (2024) and fully characterized by Folkertsma et al. (ITCS 2025), is the study of allowing a small number of errors when resetting the catalytic tape at the end of a computation. Such a notion is useful when considering the robust use of catalytic techniques in the study of ordinary space-bounded algorithms. To that end however, defining and characterizing less strict notions of error was left open by Folkertsma et al. (ITCS 2025) and other works such as Mertz (B. EATCS, 2023). We expand the definition of possible resetting error in three natural ways: 1. randomized catalytic computation which can completely destroy the catalytic tape with some probability over the randomness 2. randomized catalytic computation which makes a bounded number of errors in expectation over the randomness 3. deterministic catalytic computation which makes a bounded number of errors in expectation over the initial catalytic tape itself We show a near complete characterization of the above models, both in the general case and in the logspace polynomial-time regime, by showing equivalences either between one another, to errorless catalytic space models, or to standard time or space complexity classes. Under a derandomization assumption, we show a near full collapse of all existing catalytic classes in the logspace regime.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2026

Frontier Space-Time Algorithms Using Only Full Memory

We develop catalytic algorithms for fundamental problems in algorithm design that run in polynomial time, use only $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$ workspace, and use sublinear catalytic space matching the best-known space bounds of non-catalytic algorithms running in polynomial time. First, we design a polynomial time algorithm for directed $s$-$t$ connectivity using $n \big/ 2^{\Theta(\sqrt{\log n})}$ catalytic space, which matches the state-of-the-art time-space bounds in the non-catalytic setting [Barnes et al., 1998], and improves the catalytic space usage of the best known algorithm [Cook and Pyne, 2026]. Furthermore, using only $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))$ random bits we get a randomized algorithm whose running time nearly matches the fastest time bounds known for space-unrestricted algorithms. Second, we design polynomial time algorithms for the problems of computing Edit Distance, Longest Common Subsequence, and the Discrete Fr\'{e}chet Distance, again using $n \big/ 2^{\Theta(\sqrt{\log n})}$ catalytic space. This again matches non-catalytic time-space frontier for Edit Distance and Least Common Subsequence [Kiyomi et al., 2021].

cs.DS↗

arXiv2025

The Structure of In-Place Space-Bounded Computation

In the standard model of computing multi-output functions in logspace ($\mathsf{FL}$), we are given a read-only tape holding $x$ and a logarithmic length worktape, and must print $f(x)$ to a dedicated write-only tape. However, there has been extensive work (both in theory and in practice) on algorithms that transform $x$ into $f(x)$ in-place on a single read-write tape with limited (in our case $O(\log n)$) additional workspace. We say $f\in \mathsf{inplaceFL}$ if $f$ can be computed in this model. We initiate the study of in-place computation from a structural complexity perspective, proving upper and lower bounds on the power of $\mathsf{inplaceFL}$. We show the following: i) Unconditionally, $\mathsf{FL}\not\subseteq \mathsf{inplaceFL}$. ii) The problems of integer multiplication and evaluating $\mathsf{NC}^0_4$ circuits lie outside $\mathsf{inplaceFL}$ under cryptographic assumptions. However, evaluating $\mathsf{NC}^0_2$ circuits can be done in $\mathsf{inplaceFL}$. iii) We have $\mathsf{FL} \subseteq \mathsf{inplaceFL}^{\mathsf{STP}}.$ Consequently, proving $\mathsf{inplaceFL} \not\subseteq \mathsf{FL}$ would imply $\mathsf{SAT} \not\in \mathsf{L}$. We also consider the analogous catalytic class ($\mathsf{inplaceFCL}$), where the in-place algorithm has a large additional worktape tape that it must reset at the end of the computation. We give $\mathsf{inplaceFCL}$ algorithms for matrix multiplication and inversion over polynomial-sized finite fields. We furthermore use our results and techniques to show two novel barriers to proving $\mathsf{CL} \subseteq \mathsf{P}$. First, we show that any proof of $\mathsf{CL}\subseteq \mathsf{P}$ must be non-relativizing, by giving an oracle relative to which $\mathsf{CL}^O=\mathsf{EXP}^O$. Second, we identify a search problem in $\mathsf{searchCL}$ but not known to be in $\mathsf{P}$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Quantum Catalytic Space

Space complexity is a key field of study in theoretical computer science. In the quantum setting there are clear motivations to understand the power of space-restricted computation, as qubits are an especially precious and limited resource. Recently, a new branch of space-bounded complexity called catalytic computing has shown that reusing space is a very powerful computational resource, especially for subroutines that incur little to no space overhead. While quantum catalysis in an information theoretic context, and the power of ``dirty'' qubits for quantum computation, has been studied over the years, these models are generally not suitable for use in quantum space-bounded algorithms, as they either rely on specific catalytic states or destroy the memory being borrowed. We define the notion of catalytic computing in the quantum setting and show a number of initial results about the model. First, we show that quantum catalytic logspace can always be computed quantumly in polynomial time; the classical analogue of this is the largest open question in catalytic computing. This also allows quantum catalytic space to be defined in an equivalent way with respect to circuits instead of Turing machines. We also prove that quantum catalytic logspace can simulate log-depth threshold circuits, a class which is known to contain (and believed to strictly contain) quantum logspace, thus showcasing the power of quantum catalytic space. Finally we show that both unitary quantum catalytic logspace and classical catalytic logspace can be simulated in the one-clean qubit model.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2025

Catalytic Computing and Register Programs Beyond Log-Depth

In a seminal work, Buhrman et al. (STOC 2014) defined the class $CSPACE(s,c)$ of problems solvable in space $s$ with an additional catalytic tape of size $c$, which is a tape whose initial content must be restored at the end of the computation. They showed that uniform $TC^1$ circuits are computable in catalytic logspace, i.e., $CL=CSPACE(O(\log{n}), 2^{O(\log{n})})$, thus giving strong evidence that catalytic space gives $L$ strict additional power. Their study focuses on an arithmetic model called register programs, which has been a focal point in development since then. Understanding $CL$ remains a major open problem, as $TC^1$ remains the most powerful containment to date. In this work, we study the power of catalytic space and register programs to compute circuits of larger depth. Using register programs, we show that for every $\epsilon > 0$, $SAC^2 \subseteq CSPACE\left(O\left(\frac{\log^2{n}}{\log\log{n}}\right), 2^{O(\log^{1+\epsilon} n)}\right)$ This is an $O(\log \log n)$ factor improvement on the free space needed to compute $SAC^2$, which can be accomplished with near-polynomial catalytic space. We also exhibit non-trivial register programs for matrix powering, which is a further step towards showing $NC^2 \subseteq CL$.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Bipartite Matching is in Catalytic Logspace

Matching is a central problem in theoretical computer science, with a large body of work spanning the last five decades. However, understanding matching in the time-space bounded setting remains a longstanding open question, even in the presence of additional resources such as randomness or non-determinism. In this work we study space-bounded machines with access to catalytic space, which is additional working memory that is full with arbitrary data that must be preserved at the end of its computation. Despite this heavy restriction, many recent works have shown the power of catalytic space, its utility in designing classical space-bounded algorithms, and surprising connections between catalytic computation and derandomization. Our main result is that bipartite maximum matching ($MATCH$) can be computed in catalytic logspace ($CL$) with a polynomial time bound ($CLP$). Moreover, we show that $MATCH$ can be reduced to the lossy coding problem for $NC$ circuits ($LOSSY[NC]$). This has consequences for matching, catalytic space, and derandomization: - Matching: this is the first well studied subclass of $P$ which is known to compute $MATCH$, as well as the first algorithm simultaneously using sublinear free space and polynomial time with any additional resources. - Catalytic space: this is the first new problem shown to be in $CL$ since the model was defined, and one which is extremely central and well-studied. - Derandomization: we give the first class $\mathcal{C}$ beyond $L$ for which we exhibit a natural problem in $LOSSY[\mathcal{C}]$ which is not known to be in $\mathcal{C}$, as well as a full derandomization of the isolation lemma in $CL$ in the context of $MATCH$. Our proof combines a number of strengthened ideas from isolation-based algorithms for matching alongside the compress-or-random framework in catalytic computation.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2025

Collapsing Catalytic Classes

A catalytic machine is a space-bounded Turing machine with additional access to a second, much larger work tape, with the caveat that this tape is full, and its contents must be preserved by the computation. Catalytic machines were defined by Buhrman et al. (STOC 2014), who, alongside many follow-up works, exhibited the power of catalytic space ($CSPACE$) and in particular catalytic logspace machines ($CL$) beyond that of traditional space-bounded machines. Several variants of $CL$ have been proposed, including non-deterministic and co-non-deterministic catalytic computation by Buhrman et al. (STACS 2016) and randomized catalytic computation by Datta et al. (CSR 2020). These and other works proposed several questions, such as catalytic analogues of the theorems of Savitch and Immerman and Szelepcs\'enyi. Catalytic computation was recently derandomized by Cook et al. (STOC 2025), but only in certain parameter regimes. We settle almost all questions regarding randomized and non-deterministic catalytic computation, by giving an optimal reduction from catalytic space with additional resources to the corresponding non-catalytic space classes. With regards to non-determinism, our main result is that \[CL=CNL\] and with regards to randomness we show \[CL=CPrL\] where $CPrL$ denotes randomized catalytic logspace where the accepting probability can be arbitrarily close to $1/2$. We also have a number of near-optimal partial results for non-deterministic and randomized catalytic computation with less catalytic space. We show catalytic versions of Savitch's theorem, Immerman-Szelepsc\'enyi, and the derandomization results of Nisan and Saks and Zhou, all of which are unconditional and hold for all parameter settings. Our results build on the compress-or-compute framework of Cook et al. (STOC 2025). Despite proving broader and stronger results, our framework is simpler and more modular.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2024

Fully Characterizing Lossy Catalytic Computation

A catalytic machine is a model of computation where a traditional space-bounded machine is augmented with an additional, significantly larger, "catalytic" tape, which, while being available as a work tape, has the caveat of being initialized with an arbitrary string, which must be preserved at the end of the computation. Despite this restriction, catalytic machines have been shown to have surprising additional power; a logspace machine with a polynomial length catalytic tape, known as catalytic logspace ($CL$), can compute problems which are believed to be impossible for $L$. A fundamental question of the model is whether the catalytic condition, of leaving the catalytic tape in its exact original configuration, is robust to minor deviations. This study was initialized by Gupta et al. (2024), who defined lossy catalytic logspace ($LCL[e]$) as a variant of $CL$ where we allow up to $e$ errors when resetting the catalytic tape. They showed that $LCL[e] = CL$ for any $e = O(1)$, which remains the frontier of our understanding. In this work we completely characterize lossy catalytic space ($LCSPACE[s,c,e]$) in terms of ordinary catalytic space ($CSPACE[s,c]$). We show that $$LCSPACE[s,c,e] = CSPACE[\Theta(s + e \log c), \Theta(c)]$$ In other words, allowing $e$ errors on a catalytic tape of length $c$ is equivalent, up to a constant stretch, to an equivalent errorless catalytic machine with an additional $e \log c$ bits of ordinary working memory. As a consequence, we show that for any $e$, $LCL[e] = CL$ implies $SPACE[e \log n] \subseteq ZPP$, thus giving a barrier to any improvement beyond $LCL[O(1)] = CL$. We also show equivalent results for non-deterministic and randomized catalytic space.

cs.CC↗

arXiv2020

Automating Cutting Planes is NP-Hard}

We show that Cutting Planes (CP) proofs are hard to find: Given an unsatisfiable formula $F$, 1) It is NP-hard to find a CP refutation of $F$ in time polynomial in the length of the shortest such refutation; and 2)unless Gap-Hitting-Set admits a nontrivial algorithm, one cannot find a tree-like CP refutation of $F$ in time polynomial in the length of the shortest such refutation. The first result extends the recent breakthrough of Atserias and Müller (FOCS 2019) that established an analogous result for Resolution. Our proofs rely on two new lifting theorems: (1) Dag-like lifting for gadgets with many output bits. (2) Tree-like lifting that simulates an $r$-round protocol with gadgets of query complexity $O(\log r)$ independent of input length.

cs.CC↗