SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ibrahim Tahir

Publications and source records attributed to Ibrahim Tahir.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimization over Trained (and Sparse) Neural Networks: A Surrogate within a Surrogate

In constraint learning, we use a neural network as a surrogate for part of the constraints or of the objective function of an optimization model. However, the tractability of the resulting model is heavily influenced by the size of the neural network used as a surrogate. One way to obtain a more tractable surrogate is by pruning the neural network first. In this work, we consider how to approach the setting in which the neural network is actually a given: how can we solve an optimization model embedding a large and predetermined neural network? We propose surrogating the neural network itself by pruning it, which leads to a sparse and more tractable optimization model, for which we hope to still obtain good solutions with respect to the original neural network. For network verification and function maximization models, that indeed leads to better solutions within a time limit, especially -- and surprisingly -- if we skip the standard retraining step known as finetuning. Hence, a pruned network with worse inference for lack of finetuning can be a better surrogate.

math.OC

Response to "On the giant deformation and ferroelectricity of guanidinium nitrate" by Marek Szafrański and Andrzej Katrusiak

Following a well-established practice of publishing commentaries to articles of other authors who work on materials that were earlier studied by them (n.b. six published comments[1-6]), Marek Szafrański(MS) and Andrzej Katrusiak (AK) have filed on the preprint server arXiv a manuscript entitled "On the giant deformation and ferroelectricity of guanidinium nitrate"[7] with comments on our article "Exceptionally high work density of a ferroelectric dynamic organic crystal around room temperature" published in Nature Communications (2022, 13, 2823).[8] Both in the submitted comment as well as in the required (by the journal) direct communication with us preceding its posting, MS and AK have expressed dissatisfaction with the choice of literature references in our article, for which they felt that their previous work on this material has not been cited to a sufficient extent. In their comment, they summarize their other remarks on our article as "the structural determinations of GN [guanidinium nitrate] crystals, their phase transitions and associated giant deformation, as well as its detailed structural mechanism, the molecular dynamics and dielectric properties were reported before, while the semiconductivity, ferroelectricity, and fatigue resistance of the GN [guanidinium nitrate] crystals cannot be confirmed."[7] Apart from the sentiments of MS and AK on our choice of cited literature, we find their comments on the scientific content of our article to be strongly biased towards their own results and unfounded. Below, we provide a detailed response to their comments.

cond-mat.mtrl-sci