Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Ieva Burakauskaitė

Publications and source records attributed to Ieva Burakauskaitė.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Toward design-based inference for data integration

Integrating non-probability samples into finite-population inference typically requires modeling unknown selection probabilities under a missing-at-random (MAR) assumption that is difficult to verify. We propose a design-based alternative in which the non-probability sample is treated as a fully observed certainty stratum and a probability sample is drawn only from the complementary, previously unsampled units. Within this sequential framework, we develop two generalized regression estimators: one fitting the outcome model separately in the complementary stratum, the other pooling both samples; we make two distinct contributions. First, both estimators are design-consistent and admit consistent variance estimators with no assumption whatsoever on the non-probability selection mechanism, including under not-missing-at-random (NMAR) selection. Second, under a working superpopulation model that holds in both strata, the pilot non-probability sample can be used to construct second-stage inclusion probabilities that achieve Isaki-Fuller asymptotic optimality for the separate estimator; this optimality claim relies on assumptions strictly stronger than MAR, but its failure does not invalidate the consistency results above. A diagnostic test for coefficient homogeneity is proposed to guide the choice between the two estimators. Simulations confirm that the sequential estimators remain essentially unbiased under both MAR and NMAR, while propensity-adjusted competitors can be severely biased under NMAR. Two applications from Lithuanian official statistics illustrate that separate regression is preferable when the pilot stratum and its complement are strongly heterogeneous, whereas combined regression offers a modest efficiency gain when the two strata are similar.

stat.ME↗

Small area estimation using incomplete auxiliary information

Auxiliary information is increasingly available from administrative and other data sources, but it is often incomplete and of non-probability origin. We propose a two-step small area estimation approach in which the first step relies on design-based model calibration and exploits a large non-probability source providing a noisy proxy of the study variable for only part of the population. A unit-level measurement-error working model is fitted on the linked overlap between the probability survey and the external source, and its predictions are incorporated through domain-specific model-calibration constraints to obtain approximately design-unbiased domain totals. These totals and their variance estimates are then used in a Fay-Herriot area-level model with exactly known covariates to produce empirical best linear unbiased predictors. The approach is demonstrated in three enterprise survey settings from official statistics by integrating probability sample data with (i) administrative records, (ii) a cut-off data source, and (iii) web-scraped online information. Empirical comparisons show consistent improvements in domain-level precision over direct estimation and over a Fay-Herriot benchmark that directly incorporates the proxy information as an error-prone covariate. These gains are achieved without modeling the selection mechanism of the non-probability sample.

stat.ME↗