SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Igor A. Litvin

Publications and source records attributed to Igor A. Litvin.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Phase-Drift Limits and Adaptive Quadrature Readout in Programmable Photonic Processors

Phase fluctuations between optical inputs limit programmable photonic processors because their output powers depend on coherent interference. We study the phase-drift penalty that arises when sine and cosine quadratures are measured sequentially rather than simultaneously. The analysis is motivated by measurements from an eight-mode programmable photonic processor, including 35 free-running recordings of 300 s acquired at approximately 125 samples per second per channel. These recordings provide an empirical route for estimating the phase-increment variance at a selected reconfiguration interval. The estimate is defined at the time of the second measurement. For fixed quadrature order, perturbation of the atan2 reconstruction gives $e_{C\to S}=-δ_τ\sin^2ϕ_0+O(δ_τ^2)$ and $e_{S\to C}=-δ_τ\cos^2ϕ_0+O(δ_τ^2)$. Writing $Q_τ=\operatorname{Var}(δ_τ)$, uniform phase averaging gives the first-order drift mean-square error $3Q_τ/8$. A phase-predicted ordering rule measures the locally less informative quadrature first and the more informative quadrature second. Its uniform first-order penalty is $(3/8-1/π)Q_τ$, which is 84.9 percent below the fixed-order value. We also derive an increment-aware estimator from a local state-space model. Marginalizing the unknown phase increment increases the variance of a stale phase observation by $Q_τ$, reducing its Fisher information from $I$ to $I/(1+IQ_τ)$. For ideal balanced Poisson detection, the Fisher information of each quadrature equals its detected signal-photon number. This yields dimensionless architecture boundaries in spatial information and phase-increment variance. Nonlinear Monte Carlo simulations validate the perturbative laws, quantify robustness to prediction error, and compare simultaneous, fixed-order, increment-aware, and adaptive receivers under a common noise model.

physics.optics

Local Variance-Based Calibration of Programmable Photonic Interferometer Meshes

Programmable photonic interferometer meshes enable reconfigurable linear optical transformations, but their performance depends critically on accurate calibration of Mach-Zehnder interferometers and phase shifters. Conventional methods often require node isolation, dedicated routing paths, orthogonal training states, reference channels, or prior phase-voltage characterization, which become increasingly difficult in large thermally tuned meshes. We introduce a local variance-based self-calibration method using intensity-only measurements. Controlled phase perturbations are applied, and calibration points are identified from minima of the measured output-power variance. For Mach-Zehnder interferometers, the variance follows a characteristic |sin(theta)| dependence, allowing bar and cross operating points to be found without conventional node isolation. For phase shifters, balanced interference produces a complementary |cos(phi)| variance signature, enabling quadrature calibration through the same statistical principle. We validate the method experimentally on an 8 x 8 silicon nitride programmable photonic processor using a fully automated two-stage procedure. Starting from random phase settings, all Mach-Zehnder interferometers are calibrated first, followed by phase-shifter calibration under balanced-interference conditions. As a system-level test, we implement an embedded 4 x 4 Hadamard transformation on the 8 x 8 processor using a Clements decomposition. These results establish local output variance as a simple calibration observable for programmable photonic meshes. The method is compatible with discrete random phase ensembles and requires neither conventional node isolation nor orthogonal training fields, making it a practical calibration primitive for scalable self-stabilizing photonic processors.

physics.optics

Optimised brightness from solid-state lasers

Laser brightness is a measure of the ability to de- liver intense light to a target, and encapsulates both the energy content and the beam quality. High brightness lasers requires that both parameters be maximised, yet standard laser cavities do not allow this. For example, in solid-state lasers multimode beams have a high energy content but low beam quality, while Gaussian modes have a small mode volume and hence low energy extraction, but in a good quality mode. Here we over- come this fundamental limitation and demonstrate an optimal approach to realising high brightness lasers. We employ intra- cavity beam shaping to produce a Gaussian mode that carries all the energy of the multimode beam, thus energy extraction and beam quality are simultaneously maximised. This work will have a significant influence on the design of future high brightness laser cavities.

physics.optics