arXiv subjects

Igor Gitman

Publications and source records attributed to Igor Gitman.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2018

Mixed-Precision Training for NLP and Speech Recognition with OpenSeq2Seq

We present OpenSeq2Seq - a TensorFlow-based toolkit for training sequence-to-sequence models that features distributed and mixed-precision training. Benchmarks on machine translation and speech recognition tasks show that models built using OpenSeq2Seq give state-of-the-art performance at 1.5-3x less training time. OpenSeq2Seq currently provides building blocks for models that solve a wide range of tasks including neural machine translation, automatic speech recognition, and speech synthesis.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2018

Novel Prediction Techniques Based on Clusterwise Linear Regression

In this paper we explore different regression models based on Clusterwise Linear Regression (CLR). CLR aims to find the partition of the data into $k$ clusters, such that linear regressions fitted to each of the clusters minimize overall mean squared error on the whole data. The main obstacle preventing to use found regression models for prediction on the unseen test points is the absence of a reasonable way to obtain CLR cluster labels when the values of target variable are unknown. In this paper we propose two novel approaches on how to solve this problem. The first approach, predictive CLR builds a separate classification model to predict test CLR labels. The second approach, constrained CLR utilizes a set of user-specified constraints that enforce certain points to go to the same clusters. Assuming the constraint values are known for the test points, they can be directly used to assign CLR labels. We evaluate these two approaches on three UCI ML datasets as well as on a large corpus of health insurance claims. We show that both of the proposed algorithms significantly improve over the known CLR-based regression methods. Moreover, predictive CLR consistently outperforms linear regression and random forest, and shows comparable performance to support vector regression on UCI ML datasets. The constrained CLR approach achieves the best performance on the health insurance dataset, while enjoying only $\approx 20$ times increased computational time over linear regression.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2018

Convergence Analysis of Gradient Descent Algorithms with Proportional Updates

The rise of deep learning in recent years has brought with it increasingly clever optimization methods to deal with complex, non-linear loss functions. These methods are often designed with convex optimization in mind, but have been shown to work well in practice even for the highly non-convex optimization associated with neural networks. However, one significant drawback of these methods when they are applied to deep learning is that the magnitude of the update step is sometimes disproportionate to the magnitude of the weights (much smaller or larger), leading to training instabilities such as vanishing and exploding gradients. An idea to combat this issue is gradient descent with proportional updates. Gradient descent with proportional updates was introduced in 2017. It was independently developed by You et al (Layer-wise Adaptive Rate Scaling (LARS) algorithm) and by Abu-El-Haija (PercentDelta algorithm). The basic idea of both of these algorithms is to make each step of the gradient descent proportional to the current weight norm and independent of the gradient magnitude. It is common in the context of new optimization methods to prove convergence or derive regret bounds under the assumption of Lipschitz continuity and convexity. However, even though LARS and PercentDelta were shown to work well in practice, there is no theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of these algorithms. Thus it is not clear if the idea of gradient descent with proportional updates is used in the optimal way, or if it could be improved by using a different norm or specific learning rate schedule, for example. Moreover, it is not clear if these algorithms can be extended to other problems, besides neural networks. We attempt to answer these questions by establishing the theoretical analysis of gradient descent with proportional updates, and verifying this analysis with empirical examples.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2017

Comparison of Batch Normalization and Weight Normalization Algorithms for the Large-scale Image Classification

Batch normalization (BN) has become a de facto standard for training deep convolutional networks. However, BN accounts for a significant fraction of training run-time and is difficult to accelerate, since it is a memory-bandwidth bounded operation. Such a drawback of BN motivates us to explore recently proposed weight normalization algorithms (WN algorithms), i.e. weight normalization, normalization propagation and weight normalization with translated ReLU. These algorithms don't slow-down training iterations and were experimentally shown to outperform BN on relatively small networks and datasets. However, it is not clear if these algorithms could replace BN in practical, large-scale applications. We answer this question by providing a detailed comparison of BN and WN algorithms using ResNet-50 network trained on ImageNet. We found that although WN achieves better training accuracy, the final test accuracy is significantly lower ($\approx 6\%$) than that of BN. This result demonstrates the surprising strength of the BN regularization effect which we were unable to compensate for using standard regularization techniques like dropout and weight decay. We also found that training of deep networks with WN algorithms is significantly less stable compared to BN, limiting their practical applications.

cs.CV↗

arXiv2017

Large Batch Training of Convolutional Networks

A common way to speed up training of large convolutional networks is to add computational units. Training is then performed using data-parallel synchronous Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with mini-batch divided between computational units. With an increase in the number of nodes, the batch size grows. But training with large batch size often results in the lower model accuracy. We argue that the current recipe for large batch training (linear learning rate scaling with warm-up) is not general enough and training may diverge. To overcome this optimization difficulties we propose a new training algorithm based on Layer-wise Adaptive Rate Scaling (LARS). Using LARS, we scaled Alexnet up to a batch size of 8K, and Resnet-50 to a batch size of 32K without loss in accuracy.

cs.CV↗