SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Isaac Meilijson

Publications and source records attributed to Isaac Meilijson.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Convex bounds for last passage percolation with dependent identically distributed weights

On the $Z^2$ lattice, vertices are assigned random weights $W(i,j)$. The point-to-point last passage percolation (LPP) time $S_{M,N+1-M}$ between $(1,1)$ and $(M,N+1-M)$ is the maximum total weight among all upward/right-oriented paths connecting the two. Point-to-line LPP time $R_N$ is the maximum of these maximal total weights over $M$. Asymptotic distributions and fluctuations of these LPP times have been studied for i.i.d. weights. The current study deals with identically distributed but not necessarily independent weights, and maximizes LPP times in the sense of increasing convex dominance. In particular, maximal expected LPP times are identified, in the class of all weight couplings with a given marginal distribution. For the case of mean-$1$ exponentially distributed weights, there is a coupling for which $R_N$ is the shifted exponential variable $R_N^* = N W(1,1) + \log(N!)$, such that $E[\Psi(R_N)] \le E[\Psi(R_N^*)]$ for all couplings and all convex non-decreasing functions $\Psi$ for which these expectations are well defined. In contrast to ${{R_N^*} \over N}= W(1,1)+{{\log(N!)} \over N}$, with variance $1$ and mean diverging to $\infty$ like $\log(N)$, ${{R_N} \over N}$ converges a.s. to $2$ for the commonly studied i.i.d. weights. As for {\em small} LPP, expected LPP time is at least $NE[W(1,1)]$, attained by assigning to each anti-diagonal identical weights. The minimal possible variance of $R_N$ is asymptotically zero for exponential weights.

math.PR

The observed Fisher information attached to the EM algorithm, illustrated on Shepp and Vardi estimation procedure for positron emission tomography

The Shepp & Vardi (1982) implementation of the EM algorithm for PET scan tumor estimation provides a point estimate of the tumor. The current study presents a closed-form formula of the observed Fisher information for Shepp & Vardi PET scan tumor estimation. Keywords: PET scan, EM algorithm, Fisher information matrix, standard errors.

stat.ME

The joint distribution of value and local time of simple random walk and reflected simple random walk

The joint distribution of value and local time for Brownian Motion has been reported by Borodin and Salminen. Its asymptotic behavior for recurrent random walk has been presented by Jain and Pruitt. Motivated by the need for queue size control during a pandemic (Hassin, Meilijson and Perlman), the current study presents closed form formulas for random walk and reflected random walk with $\pm 1$ increments, not necessarily fair.

math.PR

A sharp bound on the expected local time of a continuous ${\cal L}_2$-bounded Martingale

For a continuous ${\cal L}_2$-bounded Martingale with no intervals of constancy, starting at $0$ and having final variance $σ^2$, the expected local time at $x \in \cal{R}$ is at most $\sqrt{σ^2+x^2}-|x|$. This sharp bound is attained by Standard Brownian Motion stopped at the first exit time from the interval $(x-\sqrt{σ^2+x^2},x+\sqrt{σ^2+x^2})$. Sharp bounds for the expected maximum, maximal absolute value, maximal diameter and maximal number of upcrossings of intervals, have been established by Dubins and Schwarz (1988), Dubins, Gilat and Meilijson (2009) and by the authors (2017).

math.PR

Splitting matters: how monotone transformation of predictor variables may improve the predictions of decision tree models

It is widely believed that the prediction accuracy of decision tree models is invariant under any strictly monotone transformation of the individual predictor variables. However, this statement may be false when predicting new observations with values that were not seen in the training-set and are close to the location of the split point of a tree rule. The sensitivity of the prediction error to the split point interpolation is high when the split point of the tree is estimated based on very few observations, reaching 9% misclassification error when only 10 observations are used for constructing a split, and shrinking to 1% when relying on 100 observations. This study compares the performance of alternative methods for split point interpolation and concludes that the best choice is taking the mid-point between the two closest points to the split point of the tree. Furthermore, if the (continuous) distribution of the predictor variable is known, then using its probability integral for transforming the variable ("quantile transformation") will reduce the model's interpolation error by up to about a half on average. Accordingly, this study provides guidelines for both developers and users of decision tree models (including bagging and random forest).

stat.ML

The Garman-Klass volatility estimator revisited

The Garman-Klass unbiased estimator of the variance per unit time of a zero-drift Brownian Motion B, based on the usual financial data that reports for time windows of equal length the open (OPEN), minimum (MIN), maximum (MAX) and close (CLOSE) values, is quadratic in the statistic S1=(CLOSE-OPEN, OPEN-MIN, MAX-OPEN). This estimator, with efficiency 7.4 with respect to the classical estimator (CLOSE-OPEN)^2, is widely believed to be of minimal variance. The current report disproves this belief by exhibiting an unbiased estimator with slightly but strictly higher efficiency 7.7322. The essence of the improvement lies in the observation that the data should be compressed to the statistic S2 defined on W(t)= B(0)+[B(t)-B(0)]sign[(B(1)-B(0)] as S1 was defined on the Brownian path B(t). The best S2-based quadratic unbiased estimator is presented explicitly. The Cramer-Rao upper bound for the efficiency of unbiased estimators, corresponding to the efficiency of large-sample Maximum Likelihood estimators, is 8.471. This bound cannot be attained because the distribution is not of exponential type. Regression-fitted quadratic functions of S2 (with mean 1) markedly out-perform those of S1 when applied to random walks with heavy-tail-distributed increments. Performance is empirically studied in terms of the tail parameter.

stat.AP

On the adjustment coefficient, drawdowns and Lundberg-type bounds for random walk

Consider a random walk whose (light-tailed) increments have positive mean. Lower and upper bounds are provided for the expected maximal value of the random walk until it experiences a given drawdown d. These bounds, related to the Calmar ratio in Finance, are of the form (exp{alpha d}-1)/alpha and (K exp{alpha d}-1)/alpha for some K>1, in terms of the adjustment coefficient alpha (E[exp{-alpha X}]=1) of the insurance risk literature. Its inverse 1/alpha has been recently derived by Aumann and Serrano as an index of riskiness of the random variable X. This article also complements the Lundberg exponential stochastic upper bound and the Cramer-Lundberg approximation for the expected minimum of the random walk, with an exponential stochastic lower bound. The tail probability bounds are of the form C exp{-alpha x} and exp{-alpha x} respectively, for some 1/K < C < 1. Our treatment of the problem involves Skorokhod embeddings of random walks in Martingales, especially via the Azema-Yor and Dubins stopping times, adapted from standard Brownian Motion to exponential Martingales.

math.PR

On the expected diameter of an L2-bounded martingale

It is shown that the ratio between the expected diameter of an L2-bounded martingale and the standard deviation of its last term cannot exceed sqrt(3). Moreover, a one-parameter family of stopping times on standard Brownian Motion is exhibited, for which the sqrt(3) upper bound is attained. These stopping times, one for each cost-rate c, are optimal when the payoff for stopping at time t is the diameter D(t) obtained up to time t minus the hitherto accumulated cost c t. A quantity related to diameter, maximal drawdown (or rise), is introduced and its expectation is shown to be bounded by sqrt(2) times the standard deviation of the last term of the martingale. These results complement the Dubins and Schwarz respective bounds 1 and sqrt(2) for the ratios between the expected maximum and maximal absolute value of the martingale and the standard deviation of its last term. Dynamic programming (gambling theory) methods are used for the proof of optimality.

math.PR