SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Isabel Byrne

Publications and source records attributed to Isabel Byrne.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

The VC-dimension of strongly regular graphs

A graph $G$ is $n$-existentially closed or $n$-e.c. if, for all subsets $S\subseteq V(G)$ with $|S|=n$ and for all partitions $S=A\sqcup B$, there exists a vertex in $V(G)\sm S$ adjacent to all vertices in $A$ and no vertices in $B$. We study the minimum number of edges $m(v,n)$ of a $v$-vertex $n$-e.c. graph, and show that $m(v,2)=3v+O(1)$ while $m(v,n)=\Theta(v\log v)$ for fixed $n\ge 3$. The latter result uses a connection to binary covering arrays. A related parameter is the VC-dimension of $G$, defined as the size of the largest subset of vertices shattered by the neighborhoods of vertices in $G$. We initiate systematic study of the VC-dimensions of strongly regular graphs (SRGs). We characterize the sufficiently large SRGs with VC-dimension 2. Furthermore, we determine the VC-dimension of sufficiently large Latin square graphs and of all SRGs of order at most 28, and we show that the SRGs with a given integer as smallest eigenvalue have bounded VC-dimension.

math.CO

A Lower Bound on the Expected Number of Distinct Patterns in a Random Permutation

Let $\pi_n$ be a uniformly chosen random permutation on $[n]$. The authors of [2] showed that the expected number of distinct consecutive patterns of all lengths $k\in\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$ in $\pi_n$ was $\frac{n^2}{2}(1-o(1))$ as $n\to\infty$, exhibiting the fact that random permutations pack consecutive patterns near-perfectly. A conjecture was made in [11] that the same is true for non-consecutive patterns, i.e., that there are $2^n(1-o(1))$ distinct non-consecutive patterns expected in a random permutation. This conjecture is false, but, in this paper, we prove that a random permutation contains an expected number of at least $2^{n-1}(1+o(1))$ distinct permutations; this number is half of the range of the number of distinct permutations.

math.CO

Improving the minimum distance bound of Trace Goppa codes

In this article we prove that a class of Goppa codes whose Goppa polynomial is of the form $g(x) = x + x^q + \cdots + x^{q^{m-1}}$ where $m \geq 3$ (i.e. $g(x)$ is a trace polynomial from a field extension of degree $m \geq 3$) has a better minimum distance than what the Goppa bound $d \geq 2deg(g(x))+1$ implies. Our improvement is based on finding another Goppa polynomial $h$ such that $C(L,g) = C(M, h)$ but $deg(h) > deg(g)$. This is a significant improvement over Trace Goppa codes over quadratic field extensions (i.e. the case $m = 2$), as the Goppa bound for the quadratic case is sharp.

cs.IT