arXiv subjects

Isha Chaudhary

Publications and source records attributed to Isha Chaudhary.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

A Jagged Frontier: Evaluating Robustness of Code Agents to Semantics-Preserving Transformations

AI code agents are increasingly deployed to resolve real software issues, yet their reliability under superficial code variations remains poorly understood. We evaluate whether coding agents that repair repository-level issues remain reliable when the surrounding codebase is rewritten into a semantically equivalent form. We introduce a random variant sampler that applies common semantics-preserving transformations (SPTs) - spanning control-flow rewrites, dead-code injection, and identifier renaming - to produce perturbed variants. We evaluate two agentic scaffolds (mini-SWE agent and OpenCode) each backed by one of four frontier models (Claude Opus 4.5, Kimi K2.5, MiniMax M2.5, and Qwen 3.6-27B) across instances drawn from SWE-bench Verified and SWE-bench Pro. For each instance, the agent is run multiple times on the unperturbed and perturbed variants, yielding paired resolve-rate estimates that isolate the perturbation effect from intrinsic stochasticity. We find small degradation in most configurations: up to 6.7 percentage points mean resolve-rate drop in the most affected configurations with statistically significant degradations in 6 of 16 configurations of model, scaffold, and dataset. Crucially, no single model ranking by robustness holds across scaffolds - Qwen is among the most robust under mini-SWE agent on SWE-bench Verified yet the most brittle under OpenCode - revealing a jagged robustness frontier. The simpler scaffold (mini-SWE agent) is more robust to perturbation. Our results demonstrate that even top frontier models are susceptible to semantics-preserving perturbations although the effect is not uniform, raising concerns about the deployment reliability of AI code agents in diverse real-world codebases.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Quantitative Certification of Agentic Tool Selection

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in agentic systems, where a fundamental task is mapping user intents to relevant external tools. Errors in tool selection can have severe outcomes, such as unauthorized data access, even without modifying the agent's underlying model. Existing evaluations measure performance on curated, benign benchmarks. However, a pipeline's behavior in deployment depends on the tool pool the agent actually encounters, which in open registries is shaped by third parties. We introduce LLMCert-T, the first statistical framework that returns \textbf{high-confidence upper bounds on the probability that a tool-selection pipeline satisfies a declared safety specification under a realistic tool distribution}. LLMCert-T models tool-selection evaluation as a Bernoulli estimation problem, drawing inserted-tool sequences from a distribution that the safety specification fixes. To evaluate robustness against realistic deployment conditions, we instantiate this distribution as a stochastic process that generates inserted-tool sequences round by round, conditioning each round on the agent's selection in the previous round. LLMCert-T aggregates the per-trial outcomes into a one-sided Clopper-Pearson upper bound on the probability that the specification is satisfied. By returning this bound as a certificate with statistical guarantees over the inserted-tool sequence distribution, LLMCert-T makes safety claims intuitive, actionable, and comparable across models, retrievers, mitigations, and registry policies. Across popular BFCL and OpenAPI tool pools, LLMCert-T shows that current LLM agents remain fragile under Distractor Selection and Top-N Saturation specifications: their certified correctness upper bounds drop to approximately 20\%, far below their clean-pool lower bounds.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2026

Revealing Interpretable Failure Modes of VLMs

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used in safety-critical applications because of their broad reasoning capabilities and ability to generalize with minimal task-specific engineering. Despite these advantages, they can exhibit catastrophic failures in specific real-world situations, constituting failure modes. We introduce REVELIO, a framework for systematically uncovering interpretable failure modes in VLMs. We define a failure mode as a composition of interpretable, domain-relevant concepts-such as pedestrian proximity or adverse weather conditions-under which a target VLM consistently behaves incorrectly. Identifying such failures requires searching over an exponentially large discrete combinatorial space. To address this challenge, REVELIO combines two search procedures: a diversity-aware beam search that efficiently maps the failure landscape, and a Gaussian-process Thompson Sampling strategy that enables broader exploration of complex failure modes. We apply REVELIO to autonomous driving and indoor robotics domains, uncovering previously unreported vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art VLMs. In driving environments, the models often demonstrate weak spatial grounding and fail to account for major obstructions, leading to recommendations that would result in simulated crashes. In indoor robotics tasks, VLMs either miss safety hazards or behave excessively conservatively, producing false alarms and reducing operational efficiency. By identifying structured and interpretable failure modes, REVELIO offers actionable insights that can support targeted VLM safety improvements.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

Lumos: Let there be Language Model System Certification

We introduce the first principled framework, Lumos, for specifying and formally certifying Language Model System (LMS) behaviors. Lumos is an imperative probabilistic programming DSL over graphs, with constructs to generate independent and identically distributed prompts for LMS. It offers a structured view of prompt distributions via graphs, forming random prompts from sampled subgraphs. Lumos supports certifying LMS for arbitrary prompt distributions via integration with statistical certifiers. We provide hybrid (operational and denotational) semantics for Lumos, providing a rigorous way to interpret the specifications. Using only a small set of composable constructs, Lumos can encode existing LMS specifications, including complex relational and temporal specifications. It also facilitates specifying new properties - we present the first safety specifications for vision-language models (VLMs) in autonomous driving scenarios developed with Lumos. Using these, we show that the state-of-the-art VLM Qwen-VL exhibits critical safety failures, producing incorrect and unsafe responses with at least 90% probability in right-turn scenarios under rainy driving conditions, revealing substantial safety risks. Lumos's modular structure allows easy modification of the specifications, enabling LMS certification to stay abreast with the rapidly evolving threat landscape. We further integrate a prompt-level deterministic verifier to obtain guarantees over the privacy of the LLM generation distribution over a prompt distribution. Lumos is simple to program in, requiring only a few constructs, as evidenced by state-of-the-art large language models generating correct Lumos specifications in zero-shot settings. Lumos is the first systematic and extensible language-based framework for specifying and certifying LMS behaviors, paving the way for a wider adoption of LMS certification.

cs.PL↗

arXiv2026

How Catastrophic is Your LLM? Certifying Risk in Conversation

Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce catastrophic responses in conversational settings that pose serious risks to public safety and security. Existing evaluations often fail to fully reveal these vulnerabilities because they rely on fixed attack prompt sequences, lack statistical guarantees, and do not scale to the vast space of multi-turn conversations. In this work, we propose C$^3$LLM, a novel, principled statistical Certification framework for Catastrophic risks in multi-turn Conversation for LLMs that bounds the probability of an LLM generating catastrophic responses under multi-turn conversation distributions with statistical guarantees. We model multi-turn conversations as probability distributions over query sequences, represented by a Markov process on a query graph whose edges encode semantic similarity to capture realistic conversational flow, and quantify catastrophic risks using confidence intervals. We define several inexpensive and practical distributions--random node, graph path, and adaptive with rejection. Our results demonstrate that these distributions can reveal substantial catastrophic risks in frontier models, with certified lower bounds as high as 70% for the worst model, highlighting the urgent need for improved safety training strategies in frontier LLMs.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Certifying Knowledge Comprehension in LLMs

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in safety-critical systems where they provide answers based on in-context information derived from knowledge bases. As LLMs are increasingly envisioned as superhuman agents, their proficiency in knowledge comprehension-extracting relevant information and reasoning over it to answer questions, a key facet of human intelligence-becomes crucial. However, existing evaluations of LLMs on knowledge comprehension are typically conducted on small test sets, but these datasets represent only a tiny fraction of the vast number of possible queries. Simple empirical evaluations on these limited test sets raises concerns about the reliability and generalizability of the results. In this work, we introduce the first specification and certification framework for knowledge comprehension in LLMs, providing formal probabilistic guarantees for reliability. Instead of a fixed dataset, we design novel specifications that mathematically represent prohibitively large probability distributions of knowledge comprehension prompts with natural noise, using knowledge graphs. From these specifications, we generate quantitative certificates that offer high-confidence, tight bounds on the probability that a given LLM correctly answers any question drawn from the specification distribution. We apply our framework to certify SOTA LLMs in two domains: precision medicine and general question-answering. Our results reveal previously unrecognized vulnerabilities in SOTA LLMs due to natural noise in the prompts. Additionally, we establish performance hierarchies with formal guarantees among the SOTA LLMs, particularly in the context of precision medicine question-answering.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

Certifying Counterfactual Bias in LLMs

Large Language Models (LLMs) can produce biased responses that can cause representational harms. However, conventional studies are insufficient to thoroughly evaluate biases across LLM responses for different demographic groups (a.k.a. counterfactual bias), as they do not scale to large number of inputs and do not provide guarantees. Therefore, we propose the first framework, LLMCert-B that certifies LLMs for counterfactual bias on distributions of prompts. A certificate consists of high-confidence bounds on the probability of unbiased LLM responses for any set of counterfactual prompts - prompts differing by demographic groups, sampled from a distribution. We illustrate counterfactual bias certification for distributions of counterfactual prompts created by applying prefixes sampled from prefix distributions, to a given set of prompts. We consider prefix distributions consisting random token sequences, mixtures of manual jailbreaks, and perturbations of jailbreaks in LLM's embedding space. We generate non-trivial certificates for SOTA LLMs, exposing their vulnerabilities over distributions of prompts generated from computationally inexpensive prefix distributions.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Specification Generation for Neural Networks in Systems

Specifications - precise mathematical representations of correct domain-specific behaviors - are crucial to guarantee the trustworthiness of computer systems. With the increasing development of neural networks as computer system components, specifications gain more importance as they can be used to regulate the behaviors of these black-box models. Traditionally, specifications are designed by domain experts based on their intuition of correct behavior. However, this is labor-intensive and hence not a scalable approach as computer system applications diversify. We hypothesize that the traditional (aka reference) algorithms that neural networks replace for higher performance can act as effective proxies for correct behaviors of the models, when available. This is because they have been used and tested for long enough to encode several aspects of the trustworthy/correct behaviors in the underlying domain. Driven by our hypothesis, we develop a novel automated framework, SpecTRA to generate specifications for neural networks using references. We formulate specification generation as an optimization problem and solve it with observations of reference behaviors. SpecTRA clusters similar observations into compact specifications. We present specifications generated by SpecTRA for neural networks in adaptive bit rate and congestion control algorithms. Our specifications show evidence of being correct and matching intuition. Moreover, we use our specifications to show several unknown vulnerabilities of the SOTA models for computer systems.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2024

Bypassing the Safety Training of Open-Source LLMs with Priming Attacks

With the recent surge in popularity of LLMs has come an ever-increasing need for LLM safety training. In this paper, we investigate the fragility of SOTA open-source LLMs under simple, optimization-free attacks we refer to as $\textit{priming attacks}$, which are easy to execute and effectively bypass alignment from safety training. Our proposed attack improves the Attack Success Rate on Harmful Behaviors, as measured by Llama Guard, by up to $3.3\times$ compared to baselines. Source code and data are available at https://github.com/uiuc-focal-lab/llm-priming-attacks.

cs.CR↗

arXiv2024

COMET: Neural Cost Model Explanation Framework

Cost models predict the cost of executing given assembly code basic blocks on a specific microarchitecture. Recently, neural cost models have been shown to be fairly accurate and easy to construct. They can replace heavily engineered analytical cost models used in mainstream compiler workflows. However, their black-box nature discourages their adoption. In this work, we develop the first framework, COMET, for generating faithful, generalizable, and intuitive explanations for neural cost models. We generate and compare COMET's explanations for the popular neural cost model, Ithemal against those for an accurate CPU simulation-based cost model, uiCA. Our empirical findings show an inverse correlation between the prediction errors of Ithemal and uiCA and the granularity of basic block features in COMET's explanations for them, thus indicating potential reasons for the higher error of Ithemal with respect to uiCA.

cs.PF↗