SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ishaan Garg

Publications and source records attributed to Ishaan Garg.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Input-Adaptive Gating of a Dehazing Front-End for On-Device Perception in Smoke-Obscured Environments

Two-stage vision pipelines often place an enhancement network before a task network, on the assumption that a cleaner input produces a better output. We evaluate this in a firefighter assistance pipeline, where a dehazer precedes an edge detector that renders smoke-filled rooms as structural outlines. Both were designed for a Raspberry Pi 4, at 355K and 23K parameters, and quantized to UINT8 via TensorFlow Lite. The float dehazer reaches 18.60 dB peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) on held-out real smoke against 13.60 dB unprocessed and 17.08 dB for an AOD-Net trained on the same data, and the edge detector reaches an F-measure at optimal dataset scale (ODS) of 0.738, outperforming an optimized Canny's result of 0.692. Dehazing improves edge extraction under dense smoke but degrades it on clear and lightly hazed frames, where the dehazer discards more detail than the haze obscures. We therefore run the dehazer only when a dark channel haze estimate exceeds a threshold, a 10.1 ms test that lets the pipeline save 469.6 ms on the dehazing stage. Averaged over four haze levels, gating is more accurate than either fixed decision, at 0.675 mean ODS against 0.664 for always dehazing and 0.630 for never dehazing. It reduces the mean per-frame time on the Raspberry Pi from 569 ms to 321 ms, and on clear frames increases the frame rate fivefold, from 1.8 to 9 frames per second.

cs.CV

Town Hall Debate Prompting: Enhancing Logical Reasoning in LLMs through Multi-Persona Interaction

Debate is a commonly used form of human communication catered towards problem-solving because of its efficiency. Debate fundamentally allows multiple viewpoints to be brought up in problem-solving, and for complex problems, each viewpoint opens a new path for problem-solving. In this work, we apply this concept to LLM decision-making by proposing town hall-style debate prompting (THDP), a prompting method that splices a language model into multiple personas that will debate one another to reach a conclusion. Our experimental pipeline varies both the number of personas and the personality types of each persona to find the optimum town hall size and personality for benchmark performance as measured by ZebraLogic bench, a reasoning-intensive benchmark characterized by both multiple-choice and fill-in-the-blank questions. Our experimental results demonstrate that a town hall size of 5 personas with LLM-determined personality types performs optimally on ZebraLogic, achieving a 13\% improvement over one-shot CoT baselines in per-cell accuracy in GPT-4o, 9% puzzle accuracy increase in Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and an improvement in hard puzzle accuracy from 10-15%.

cs.CL