arXiv subjects

István Csányi

Publications and source records attributed to István Csányi.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

SN 2026dix: a nearby, transitional Type IIb/Ib supernova consistent with a warm supergiant progenitor

Understanding the final evolution stages of (very) massive stars and their explosive outcomes, stripped-envelope supernovae (SESNe), represent a long-term challenge for astrophysics. The latest results support a continuous distribution within the traditional SESN subclasses (IIb, Ib, Ic). The nearby ($D \approx 17.5$ Mpc) SN 2026dix seems to be another member of the recently identified group of transitional Type IIb/Ib explosions. A point source is located at the SN position within the uncertainties on multiple pre-explosion {\it HST} images. Together with post-explosion photometry and spectroscopy, it provides a good opportunity to study a rare type of SN in detail. We carried out a thorough comparative light-curve (LC) and spectral analysis of SN 2026dix. We also constructed its bolometric LC and modeled it semi-analytically. In addition, we constructed the spectral energy distribution of the presumed progenitor and compared this to model stellar atmospheres and binary stellar evolution tracks. We infer that SN 2026dix arose from an explosion in an interacting binary system, consistent with the properties of a warm ($T_\textrm{eff} \approx 6750-$7750 K; spectral type F2 to A7), luminous ($\log(L_{\rm bol}/L_{\odot})\approx 4.9-5.3$) supergiant primary and a less luminous, less massive hot dwarf companion. The nature of the identified progenitor closely resembles that of some other known cases of SNe IIb and also well aligns with both the results of our semi-analytical LC modeling and the comparison of the LCs and spectra of SN 2026dix with the output of radiative-transfer models of an exploding star with $M_\textrm{ini}$ = 18 $M_{\odot}$.

astro-ph.SR↗

arXiv2026

Distance estimate to NGC 6951 from supernova siblings Type IIP SN 2020dpw and Type Ib SN 2021sjt

{Supernova (SN) siblings are powerful tools used to calibrate and improve distance measurement methods, and to make the systematic uncertainty to distances to their host galaxies considerably lower compared to other techniques.} {In this paper we present distance estimates to NGC6951, a galaxy that hosted the Type IIP SN~2020dpw, the Type Ib SN~2021sjt, and three other SNe.} {Photometric observations of the two objects were carried out using two 80cm RC telescopes located in Hungary, while spectra were obtained from the LCO and the WiseRep database. For the distance estimates, we applied the expanding photosphere method (EPM), which connects the observed angular radius ($θ$) of a SN to its physical radius and is related to the velocity of the photosphere ($v_{\rm ph}$). Although the EPM is mostly applied to derive the distance of Type IIP SNe, in the literature there are several examples of this technique being used for Type IIn and stripped-envelope SNe as well. Therefore, we made another attempt to infer the distance of the Type Ib SN~2021sjt by applying the EPM together with its Type IIP sibling SN~2020dpw. } {Our analysis resulted in a distance of $25.76 \pm 0.34 (\rm random) \pm 5.51$ (systematic) Mpc and $24.57 \pm 1.27 (\rm random) \pm 4.64$ (systematic) Mpc for SN~2020dpw and SN~2021sjt, respectively. Systematic errors were estimated with respect to the used dilution factor, the interstellar reddening, and the date of the explosion (which was fixed to a value between the last non-detection and the first detection for each object).} {The obtained distance values agree with each other and with the literature, which shows the validity of the methods used. In this way, new and perhaps improved distance estimates to NGC 6951 were obtained, and the applicability of the EPM for Type Ib SNe was tested.}

astro-ph.HE↗

arXiv2024

Ejecta masses in Type Ia Supernovae -- Implications for the Progenitor and the Explosion Scenario

The progenitor system(s) as well as the explosion mechanism(s) of thermonuclear (Type Ia) supernovae are long-standing issues in astrophysics. Here we present ejecta masses and other physical parameters for 28 recent Type Ia supernovae inferred from multiband photometric and optical spectroscopic data. Our results confirm that the majority of SNe Ia show {\it observable} ejecta masses below the Chandrasekhar-limit (having a mean $M_{\rm ej} \approx 1.1 \pm 0.3$ M$_\odot$), consistent with the predictions of recent sub-M$_{\rm Ch}$ explosion models. They are compatible with models assuming either single- or double-degenerate progenitor configurations. We also recover a sub-sample of supernovae within $1.2 $ M$_\odot$ $< M_{\rm {ej}} < 1.5$ M$_\odot$ that are consistent with near-Chandrasekhar explosions. Taking into account the uncertainties of the inferred ejecta masses, about half of our SNe are compatible with both explosion models. We compare our results with those in previous studies, and discuss the caveats and concerns regarding the applied methodology.

astro-ph.HE↗

arXiv2024

SN 2022oqm: A Bright and Multi-peaked Calcium-rich Transient

We present the photometric and spectroscopic evolution of SN 2022oqm, a nearby multi-peaked hydrogen- and helium-weak calcium-rich transient (CaRT). SN 2022oqm was detected 13.1 kpc from its host galaxy, the face-on spiral galaxy NGC 5875. Extensive spectroscopic coverage reveals an early hot (T >= 40,000 K) continuum and carbon features observed $\sim$1~day after discovery, SN Ic-like photospheric-phase spectra, and strong forbidden calcium emission starting 38 days after discovery. SN 2022oqm has a relatively high peak luminosity (MB = -17 mag) for (CaRTs), making it an outlier in the population. We determine that three power sources are necessary to explain the light curve (LC), with each corresponding to a distinct peak. The first peak is powered by an expanding blackbody with a power law luminosity, suggesting shock cooling by circumstellar material (CSM). Subsequent LC evolution is powered by a double radioactive decay model, consistent with two sources of photons diffusing through optically thick ejecta. From the LC, we derive an ejecta mass and 56Ni mass of ~0.6 solar masses and ~0.09 solar masses. Spectroscopic modeling suggests 0.6 solar masses of ejecta, and with well-mixed Fe-peak elements throughout. We discuss several physical origins for SN 2022oqm and find either a surprisingly massive white dwarf progenitor or a peculiar stripped envelope model could explain SN 2022oqm. A stripped envelope explosion inside a dense, hydrogen- and helium-poor CSM, akin to SNe Icn, but with a large 56Ni mass and small CSM mass could explain SN 2022oqm. Alternatively, helium detonation on an unexpectedly massive white dwarf could also explain SN 2022oqm.

astro-ph.HE↗

arXiv2023

BU Canis Minoris -- the Most Compact Known Flat Doubly Eclipsing Quadruple System

We have found that the 2+2 quadruple star system BU CMi is currently the most compact quadruple system known, with an extremely short outer period of only 121 days. The previous record holder was TIC 219006972 (Kostov et al. 2023), with a period of 168 days. The quadruple nature of BU CMi was established by Volkov et al. (2021), but they misidentified the outer period as 6.6 years. BU CMi contains two eclipsing binaries (EBs), each with a period near 3 days, and a substantial eccentricity of about 0.22. All four stars are within about 0.1 solar mass of 2.4 solar masses. Both binaries exhibit dynamically driven apsidal motion with fairly short apsidal periods of about 30 years, thanks to the short outer orbital period. The outer period of 121 days is found both from the dynamical perturbations, with this period imprinted on the eclipse timing variations (ETV) curve of each EB by the other binary, and by modeling the complex line profiles in a collection of spectra. We find that the three orbital planes are all mutually aligned to within 1 degree, but the overall system has an inclination angle near 83.5 degrees. We utilize a complex spectro-photodynamical analysis to compute and tabulate all the interesting stellar and orbital parameters of the system. Finally, we also find an unexpected dynamical perturbation on a timescale of several years whose origin we explore. This latter effect was misinterpreted by Volkov et al. (2021) and led them to conclude that the outer period was 6.6 years rather than the 121 days that we establish here.

astro-ph.SR↗