Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Iván Arcos

Publications and source records attributed to Iván Arcos.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Human-Centered Multimodal Fusion for Sexism Detection in Memes with Eye-Tracking, Heart Rate, and EEG Signals

The automated detection of sexism in memes is a challenging task due to multimodal ambiguity, cultural nuance, and the use of humor to provide plausible deniability. Content-only models often fail to capture the complexity of human perception. To address this limitation, we introduce and validate a human-centered paradigm that augments standard content features with physiological data. We created a novel resource by recording Eye-Tracking (ET), Heart Rate (HR), and Electroencephalography (EEG) from 16 subjects (8 per experiment) while they viewed 3984 memes from the EXIST 2025 dataset. Our statistical analysis reveals significant physiological differences in how subjects process sexist versus non-sexist content. Sexist memes were associated with higher cognitive load, reflected in increased fixation counts and longer reaction times, as well as differences in EEG spectral power across the Alpha, Beta, and Gamma bands, suggesting more demanding neural processing. Building on these findings, we propose a multimodal fusion model that integrates physiological signals with enriched textual-visual features derived from a Vision-Language Model (VLM). Our final model achieves an AUC of 0.794 in binary sexism detection, a statistically significant 3.4% improvement over a strong VLM-based baseline. The fusion is particularly effective for nuanced cases, boosting the F1-score for the most challenging fine-grained category, Misogyny and Non-Sexual Violence, by 26.3%. These results show that physiological responses provide an objective signal of perception that enhances the accuracy and human-awareness of automated systems for countering online sexism.

cs.HC↗

Divergent Emotional Patterns in Disinformation on Social Media? An Analysis of Tweets and TikToks about the DANA in Valencia

This study investigates the dissemination of disinformation on social media platforms during the DANA event (DANA is a Spanish acronym for Depresion Aislada en Niveles Altos, translating to high-altitude isolated depression) that resulted in extremely heavy rainfall and devastating floods in Valencia, Spain, on October 29, 2024. We created a novel dataset of 650 TikTok and X posts, which was manually annotated to differentiate between disinformation and trustworthy content. Additionally, a Few-Shot annotation approach with GPT-4o achieved substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa of 0.684) with manual labels. Emotion analysis revealed that disinformation on X is mainly associated with increased sadness and fear, while on TikTok, it correlates with higher levels of anger and disgust. Linguistic analysis using the LIWC dictionary showed that trustworthy content utilizes more articulate and factual language, whereas disinformation employs negations, perceptual words, and personal anecdotes to appear credible. Audio analysis of TikTok posts highlighted distinct patterns: trustworthy audios featured brighter tones and robotic or monotone narration, promoting clarity and credibility, while disinformation audios leveraged tonal variation, emotional depth, and manipulative musical elements to amplify engagement. In detection models, SVM+TF-IDF achieved the highest F1-Score, excelling with limited data. Incorporating audio features into roberta-large-bne improved both Accuracy and F1-Score, surpassing its text-only counterpart and SVM in Accuracy. GPT-4o Few-Shot also performed well, showcasing the potential of large language models for automated disinformation detection. These findings demonstrate the importance of leveraging both textual and audio features for improved disinformation detection on multimodal platforms like TikTok.

cs.CL↗