SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Ivan Khalamendyk

Publications and source records attributed to Ivan Khalamendyk.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Certified Countermodels in Profile and Incidence Fibres of Diamond-Induced Edge Partitions

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a finite loopless directed graph. Each directed two-step diamond identifies its two pairs of opposite edges, and the connected components of the resulting auxiliary graph on $E$ define a canonical partition $\Pi_{\mathrm{opp}}(G)$. We ask whether a finite relational certificate built from the blocks of an edge partition identifies this canonical partition. We prove the functoriality and a universal coarsening property of $\Pi_{\mathrm{opp}}(G)$, count its complete fixed-profile fibre and its exact radius-one transposition neighbourhood, and reduce the parity condition in the certificate to an odd closed walk in a directed $\mathbb Z_2$-gain graph. In a fixed catalogue, four labelled target-positive rows, representing three isomorphism types, each admits a noncanonical positive partition obtained by a single cross-block transposition. In one row a stronger positive comparison partition also preserves every per-vertex, fixed-role incoming and outgoing count; it arises from a 12-edge alternating trade. The corresponding incidence fibre is a singleton in the other three rows. A deterministic 64-index family of comparison partitions yields 78 bounded positives among 256 nonidentity partitions. On the same profile fibre, one member has a complete 885-element relation semigroup and no write-preserve-use certificate, giving an exact negative. Thus the certificate has genuine but intermediate selectivity: it is neither determined by block sizes nor specific to the canonical target. The claims are finite statements in computational combinatorics and are supported by explicit, independently checkable certificates.

math.CO

Uniformity without Projective Consistency: An Exact Counterexample for a Nested Binary Term Grammar

Let T_0={L} and T_{r+1}={L} union {N(a,b):a,b in T_r}. On the nonleaf terms E_r, require each event N(a,b) to occur after its nonleaf children, and let mu_r be the uniform measure on the linear extensions of this poset. We study the restriction rho_43 that deletes the new level-4 events while preserving the relative order of the level-3 events. We prove that the pushforward of mu_4 under rho_43 is not mu_3. Two explicit orders on the 25 level-3 events have different numbers of level-4 extensions. If b_i is the number of T_2 terms, including the leaf, seen in a prefix of length i, the number of newly released events is (i+1)^2-b_i^2. The release profile of a depth-priority order dominates that of a level order pointwise and is strictly larger for 3<=i<=15. An explicit injection between admissible interleavings therefore gives a strict analytic fiber inequality. Two algorithmically independent exact computations reproduce both 1557-digit fiber counts; their reduced ratio is 614690215260160000/479048686862260621, approximately 1.2831476885707443. The analogous restrictions through level 3 are consistent, so 4-to-3 is the first failure in this grammar. The result is specific to this grammar, uniform measures, and restriction map.

math.CO