arXiv subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Jørgen Villadsen.
MiniCalc is a web app for teaching first-order logic based on a minimal sequent calculus. As an option the proofs can be verified in the Isabelle proof assistant. We present the lessons learned using the tool in recent years at our university.
We present a formalization of higher-order logic in the Isabelle proof assistant, building directly on the foundational framework Isabelle/Pure and developed to be as small and readable as possible. It should therefore serve as a good introduction for someone looking into learning about higher-order logic and proof assistants, without having to study the much more complex Isabelle/HOL with heavier automation. To showcase our development and approach we explain a sample proof, describe the axioms and rules of our higher-order logic, and discuss our experience with teaching the subject in a classroom setting.
Proof competence, i.e. the ability to write and check (mathematical) proofs, is an important skill in Computer Science, but for many students it represents a difficult challenge. The main issues are the correct use of formal language and the ascertainment of whether proofs, especially the students' own, are complete and correct. Many authors have suggested using proof assistants to assist in teaching proof competence, but the efficacy of the approach is unclear. To improve the state of affairs, we introduce ProofBuddy: a web-based tool using the Isabelle proof assistant which enables researchers to conduct studies of the efficacy of approaches to using proof assistants in education by collecting fine-grained data about the way students interact with proof assistants. We have performed a preliminary usability study of ProofBuddy at the Technical University of Denmark.
We present an approach for testing student learning outcomes in a course on automated reasoning using the Isabelle proof assistant. The approach allows us to test both general understanding of formal proofs in various logical proof systems and understanding of proofs in the higher-order logic of Isabelle/HOL in particular. The use of Isabelle enables almost automatic grading of large parts of the exam. We explain our approach through a number of example problems, and explain why we believe that each of the kinds of problems we have selected are adequate measures of our intended learning outcomes. Finally, we discuss our experiences using the approach for the exam of a course on automated reasoning and suggest potential future work.
We present a novel approach for teaching logic and the metatheory of logic to students who have some experience with functional programming. We define concepts in logic as a series of functional programs in the language of the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. This allows us to make notions which are often unclear in textbooks precise, to experiment with definitions by executing them, and to prove metatheoretical theorems in full detail. We have surveyed student perceptions of our teaching approach to determine its usefulness and found that students felt that our formalizations helped them understand concepts in logic, and that they experimented with them as a learning tool. However, the approach was not enough to make students feel confident in their abilities to design and implement their own formal systems. Further studies are needed to confirm and generalize the results of our survey, but our initial results seem promising.
We describe SeCaV, a sequent calculus verifier for first-order logic in Isabelle/HOL, and the SeCaV Unshortener, an online tool that expands succinct derivations into the full SeCaV syntax. We leverage the power of Isabelle/HOL as a proof checker for our SeCaV derivations. The interactive features of Isabelle/HOL make our system transparent. For instance, the user can simply click on a side condition to see its exact definition. Our formalized soundness and completeness proofs pertain exactly to the calculus as exposed to the user and not just to some model of our tool. Users can also write their derivations in the SeCaV Unshortener, which provides a lighter syntax, and expand them for later verification. We have used both tools in our teaching.
We describe a natural deduction formalization of intuitionistic and classical propositional logic in the Isabelle/Pure framework. In contrast to earlier work, where we explored the pedagogical benefits of using a deep embedding approach to logical modelling, here we employ a logical framework modelling. This gives rise to simple and natural teaching examples and we report on the role it played in teaching our Automated Reasoning course in 2020 and 2021.
Proof assistants are important tools for teaching logic. We support this claim by discussing three formalizations in Isabelle/HOL used in a recent course on automated reasoning. The first is a formalization of System W (a system of classical propositional logic with only two primitive symbols), the second is the Natural Deduction Assistant (NaDeA), and the third is a one-sided sequent calculus that uses our Sequent Calculus Verifier (SeCaV). We describe each formalization in turn, concentrating on how we used them in our teaching, and commenting on features that are interesting or useful from a logic education perspective. In the conclusion, we reflect on the lessons learned and where they might lead us next.
We provide a brief description of the GOAL-DTU system for the agent contest, including the overall strategy and how the system is designed to apply this strategy. Our agents are implemented using the GOAL programming language. We evaluate the performance of our agents for the contest, and finally also discuss how to improve the system based on analysis of its strengths and weaknesses.
Classical first-order logic is in many ways central to work in mathematics, linguistics, computer science and artificial intelligence, so it is worthwhile to define it in full detail. We present soundness and completeness proofs of a sequent calculus for first-order logic, formalized in the interactive proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. Our formalization is based on work by Stefan Berghofer, which we have since updated to use Isabelle's declarative proof style Isar (Archive of Formal Proofs, Entry FOL-Fitting, August 2007 / July 2018). We represent variables with de Bruijn indices; this makes substitution under quantifiers less intuitive for a human reader. However, the nature of natural numbers yields an elegant solution when compared to implementations of substitution using variables represented by strings. The sequent calculus considered has the special property of an always empty antecedent and a list of formulas in the succedent. We obtain the proofs of soundness and completeness for the sequent calculus as a derived result of the inverse duality of its tableau counterpart. We strive to not only present the results of the proofs of soundness and completeness, but also to provide a deep dive into a programming-like approach to the formalization of first-order logic syntax, semantics and the sequent calculus. We use the formalization in a bachelor course on logic for computer science and discuss our experiences.
The Students' Proof Assistant (SPA) aims to both teach how to use a proof assistant like Isabelle and also to teach how reliable proof assistants are built. Technically it is a miniature proof assistant inside the Isabelle proof assistant. In addition we conjecture that a good way to teach structured proving is with a concrete prover where the connection between semantics, proof system, and prover is clear. The proofs in Lamport's TLAPS proof assistant have a very similar structure to those in the declarative prover SPA. To illustrate this we compare a proof of Pelletier's problem 43 in TLAPS, Isabelle/Isar and SPA. We also consider Pelletier's problem 34, also known as Andrews's Challenge, where students are encouraged to develop their own justification function and thus obtain a lot of insight into the proof assistant. Although SPA is fully functional we have so far only used it in a few educational scenarios.
We present the Natural Deduction Assistant (NaDeA) and discuss its advantages and disadvantages as a tool for teaching logic. NaDeA is available online and is based on a formalization of natural deduction in the Isabelle proof assistant. We first provide concise formulations of the main formalization results. We then elaborate on the prerequisites for NaDeA, in particular we describe a formalization in Isabelle of "Hilbert's Axioms" that we use as a starting point in our bachelor course on mathematical logic. We discuss a recent evaluation of NaDeA and also give an overview of the exercises in NaDeA.
We describe our Natural Deduction Assistant (NaDeA) and the interfaces between the Isabelle proof assistant and NaDeA. In particular, we explain how NaDeA, using a generated prover that has been verified in Isabelle, provides feedback to the student, and also how NaDeA, for each formula proved by the student, provides a generated theorem that can be verified in Isabelle.
We present a new software tool for teaching logic based on natural deduction. Its proof system is formalized in the proof assistant Isabelle such that its definition is very precise. Soundness of the formalization has been proved in Isabelle. The tool is open source software developed in TypeScript / JavaScript and can thus be used directly in a browser without any further installation. Although developed for undergraduate computer science students who are used to study and program concrete computer code in a programming language we consider the approach relevant for a broader audience and for other proof systems as well.
We provide a brief description of the Python-DTU system, including the overall design, the tools and the algorithms that we plan to use in the agent contest.
We provide a brief description of the Python-DTU system, including the overall design, the tools and the algorithms that we plan to use in the agent contest.
We provide a brief description of the Jason-DTU system, including the methodology, the tools and the team strategy that we plan to use in the agent contest.
This paper gives an overview of a proposed strategy for the "Cows and Herders" scenario given in the Multi-Agent Programming Contest 2009. The strategy is to be implemented using the Jason platform, based on the agent-oriented programming language Agent-Speak. The paper describes the agents, their goals and the strategies they should follow. The basis for the paper and for participating in the contest is a new course given in spring 2009 and our main objective is to show that we are able to implement complex multi-agent systems with the knowledge gained in an introductory course on multi-agent systems.