Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Jürgen Bernard

Publications and source records attributed to Jürgen Bernard.

16 recordsLinked to original sources

AI-Centered Grand Challenges in Visual Analytics for Healthcare: Synthesizing the VAHC 2025 Community Experience

The intersection of AI, healthcare, and visualization is evolving rapidly, posing challenges that cut across disciplinary boundaries and resist easy resolution. The Visual Analytics in Healthcare workshop (VAHC), co-located every other year at the IEEE VIS conference and the AMIA (American Medical Informatics Association) annual conference, has served as a forum to connect the visualization and medical informatics community since 2010. In 2025, to celebrate the 16th edition, we used the workshop as an opportunity to consolidate the community's collective experience (and expertise) and identify Grand Challenges where the field should prioritize going forward. We combined thematic coding of the 15 accepted VAHC workshop papers with structured group discussions among more than 40 participants, organized around three major themes: "Technical innovation vs. clinical reality", "Human-centered and scalable VAHC", and "From foundations to actionable insights", followed by post-workshop reflexive analysis. Across all three groups, AI emerged as the most consistently recurring concern. In this paper, we report our AI-centered insights from the VAHC 2025 group activity, contextualize them against the broader literature along five Grand Challenges themes, and distill them into five challenge clusters, each concluded with recommendations for future research directions that cross disciplinary boundaries: (1) trust and bias, (2) data and infrastructure, (3) explainability and communication, (4) human-AI interaction, and (5) model reliability and validation. We share these challenges and their associated research directions as a starting point for discussion and collaboration across the healthcare, AI, and visualization communities. All supplemental materials are available at https://osf.io/p79uj.

cs.HC↗

Ranking Companion: A Visual Analytics Approach to Item-Based Ranking with Hybrid Item Selection

Personalizing item ranking creation is a challenging task, especially when users lack knowledge of data attributes or the ability to express and formalize their attribute preferences. Item-based ranking creation is an approach allowing users to directly externalize preferences through known-item judgments rather than attribute-based scoring. However, a core challenge of item-based ranking is identifying and selecting representative candidate items for externalizing preferences. Existing approaches rely on singular item-selection methods, limiting flexibility and user control. To address this challenge, we present Ranking Companion, a visual analytics approach for item-based ranking that combines model-driven active learning with human-driven item-selection methods. By drawing from six complementary item-selection methods, users can externalize listwise preferences based on selected candidate items, while an iterative machine learning process with a ranking model calculates ranking results, presented to users alongside explanations for interpretation. We evaluated Ranking Companion in a formative user study with 10 participants, in which participants used each item-selection method across three iterations, revealing tradeoffs in perceived ranking quality across accuracy, diversity, novelty, transparency, control, and satisfaction. Ranking Companion contributes a unified interactive item selection space and provides preliminary empirical guidance toward the hybrid use of multiple complementary item-selection methods in personalized item-based ranking creation.

cs.HC↗

ATWL: A Formal Language for Representing, Comparing, and Reusing Visual Analytics Workflows

Visual analytics (VA) workflows are inherently complex, involving data transformation, feature engineering, visual representation, and human interpretation. They are typically described in unstructured prose, hindering systematic comparison, reuse of proven strategies, and training of novices. We present Artifact-Transform Workflow Language (ATWL), a domain-agnostic, declarative language that formally represents VA workflows by capturing their structure and underlying analytical intent. ATWL is built upon a modular ontology of eight artifact types (entities, features, arrangements, visualisations, patterns, models, knowledge, specifications) and transforms characterised by standardised intents (e.g., define-unit, characterise, contextualise, abstract). To show that formalisation effort need not impede adoption, we extract workflows from research papers through supervised interaction with LLM agents, reducing the human role to review and refinement. Using this process, we constructed a library of seventeen ATWL workflows from published VA papers. Cross-workflow analysis reveals structural regularities -- a recurrent meta-structure, recurring motifs, reusable building blocks, diverse iterative strategies, and cross-domain equivalences -- that remain invisible in prose. We further evaluate practical utility through a controlled experiment in which the same LLM addressed two analytical problems with the library supplied either as original papers or as ATWL representations. Both forms enabled useful recommendations, but the formal representation systematically added explicit iteration structure, typed data flow, fragment-level adaptation provenance, and compactness supporting scaling beyond what prose libraries can fit in an LLM's context. ATWL enables a transition from narrative descriptions to formally represented, comparable, and reusable analytical knowledge.

cs.AI↗

Data Humanism Decoded: A Characterization of its Principles to Bridge Data Visualization Researchers and Practitioners

Data Humanism is a human-centered design approach that emphasizes the personal, contextual, and imperfect nature of data. Despite its growing influence among practitioners, the 13 principles outlined in Giorgia Lupi's visual manifesto remain loosely defined in research contexts, creating a gap between design practice and systematic application. Through a mixed-methods approach, including a systematic literature review, multimedia analysis, and expert interviews, we present a characterization of Data Humanism principles for visualization researchers. Our characterization provides concrete definitions that maintain interpretive flexibility in operationalizing design choices. We validate our work through direct consultation with Lupi. Moreover, we leverage the characterization to decode a visualization work, mapping Data Humanism principles to specific visual design choices. Our work creates a common language for human-centered visualization, bridging the gap between practice and research for future applications and evaluations.

cs.HC↗

Grand Challenge: Mediating Between Confirmatory and Exploratory Research Cultures in Health Sciences and Visual Analytics

Collaboration between health science and visual analytics research is often hindered by different, sometimes incompatible approaches to research design. Health science often follows hypothesis-driven protocols, registered in advance, and focuses on reproducibility and risk mitigation. Visual analytics, in contrast, relies on iterative data exploration, prioritizing insight generation and analytic refinement through user interaction. These differences create challenges in interdisciplinary projects, including misaligned terminology, unrealistic expectations about data readiness, divergent validation norms, or conflicting explainability requirements. To address these persistent tensions, we identify seven research needs and actions: (1) guidelines for broader community adoption, (2) agreement on quality and validation benchmarks, (3) frameworks for aligning research tasks, (4) integrated workflows combining confirmatory and exploratory stages, (5) tools for harmonizing terminology across disciplines, (6) dedicated bridging roles for transdisciplinary work, and (7) cultural adaptation and mutual recognition. We organize these needs in a framework with three areas: culture, standards, and processes. They can constitute a research agenda for developing reliable, reproducible, and clinically relevant data-centric methods.

cs.HC↗

VIVA: Virtual Healthcare Interactions Using Visual Analytics, With Controllability Through Configuration

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, HealthLink BC (HLBC) rapidly integrated physicians into the triage process of their virtual healthcare service to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction with this service and preserve health care system capacity. We present the design and implementation of a visual analytics tool, VIVA (Virtual healthcare Interactions using Visual Analytics), to support HLBC in analysing various forms of usage data from the service. We abstract HLBC's data and data analysis tasks, which we use to inform our design of VIVA. We also present the interactive workflow abstraction of Scan, Act, Adapt. We validate VIVA's design through three case studies with stakeholder domain experts. We also propose the Controllability Through Configuration model to conduct and analyze design studies, and discuss architectural evolution of VIVA through that lens. It articulates configuration, both that specified by a developer or technical power user and that constructed automatically through log data from previous interactive sessions, as a bridge between the rigidity of hardwired programming and the time-consuming implementation of full end-user interactivity. Availability: Supplemental materials at https://osf.io/wv38n

cs.HC↗

The Human-Data-Model Interaction Canvas for Visual Analytics

Visual Analytics (VA) integrates humans, data, and models as key actors in insight generation and data-driven decision-making. This position paper values and reflects on 16 VA process models and frameworks and makes nine high-level observations that motivate a fresh perspective on VA. The contribution is the HDMI Canvas, a perspective to VA that complements the strengths of existing VA process models and frameworks. It systematically characterizes diverse roles of humans, data, and models, and how these actors benefit from and contribute to VA processes. The descriptive power of the HDMI Canvas eases the differentiation between a series of VA building blocks, rather than describing general VA principles only. The canvas includes modern human-centered methodologies, including human knowledge externalization and forms of feedback loops, while interpretable and explainable AI highlight model contributions beyond their conventional outputs. The HDMI Canvas has generative power, guiding the design of new VA processes and is optimized for external stakeholders, improving VA outreach, interdisciplinary collaboration, and user-centered design. The utility of the HDMI Canvas is demonstrated through two preliminary case studies.

cs.HC↗

A Design Space for the Critical Validation of LLM-Generated Tabular Data

LLM-generated tabular data is creating new opportunities for data-driven applications in academia, business, and society. To leverage benefits like missing value imputation, labeling, and enrichment with context-aware attributes, LLM-generated data needs a critical validation process. The number of pioneering approaches is increasing fast, opening a promising validation space that, so far, remains unstructured. We present a design space for the critical validation of LLM-generated tabular data with two dimensions: First, the Analysis Granularity dimension: from within-attribute (single-item and multi-item) to across-attribute perspectives (1 x 1, 1 x m, and n x n). Second, the Data Source dimension: differentiating between LLM-generated values, ground truth values, explanations, and their combinations. We discuss analysis tasks for each dimension cross-cut, map 19 existing validation approaches, and discuss the characteristics of two approaches in detail, demonstrating descriptive power.

cs.HC↗

Scalable Class-Centric Visual Interactive Labeling

Large unlabeled datasets demand efficient and scalable data labeling solutions, in particular when the number of instances and classes is large. This leads to significant visual scalability challenges and imposes a high cognitive load on the users. Traditional instance-centric labeling methods, where (single) instances are labeled in each iteration struggle to scale effectively in these scenarios. To address these challenges, we introduce cVIL, a Class-Centric Visual Interactive Labeling methodology designed for interactive visual data labeling. By shifting the paradigm from assigning-classes-to-instances to assigning-instances-to-classes, cVIL reduces labeling effort and enhances efficiency for annotators working with large, complex and class-rich datasets. We propose a novel visual analytics labeling interface built on top of the conceptual cVIL workflow, enabling improved scalability over traditional visual labeling. In a user study, we demonstrate that cVIL can improve labeling efficiency and user satisfaction over instance-centric interfaces. The effectiveness of cVIL is further demonstrated through a usage scenario, showcasing its potential to alleviate cognitive load and support experts in managing extensive labeling tasks efficiently.

cs.HC↗

DaedalusData: Exploration, Knowledge Externalization and Labeling of Particles in Medical Manufacturing -- A Design Study

In medical diagnostics of both early disease detection and routine patient care, particle-based contamination of in-vitro diagnostics consumables poses a significant threat to patients. Objective data-driven decision-making on the severity of contamination is key for reducing patient risk, while saving time and cost in quality assessment. Our collaborators introduced us to their quality control process, including particle data acquisition through image recognition, feature extraction, and attributes reflecting the production context of particles. Shortcomings in the current process are limitations in exploring thousands of images, data-driven decision making, and ineffective knowledge externalization. Following the design study methodology, our contributions are a characterization of the problem space and requirements, the development and validation of DaedalusData, a comprehensive discussion of our study's learnings, and a generalizable framework for knowledge externalization. DaedalusData is a visual analytics system that enables domain experts to explore particle contamination patterns, label particles in label alphabets, and externalize knowledge through semi-supervised label-informed data projections. The results of our case study and user study show high usability of DaedalusData and its efficient support of experts in generating comprehensive overviews of thousands of particles, labeling of large quantities of particles, and externalizing knowledge to augment the dataset further. Reflecting on our approach, we discuss insights on dataset augmentation via human knowledge externalization, and on the scalability and trade-offs that come with the adoption of this approach in practice.

cs.HC↗

A Data-Centric Methodology and Task Typology for Time-Stamped Event Sequences

Task abstractions and taxonomic structures for tasks are useful for designers of interactive data analysis approaches, serving as design targets and evaluation criteria alike. For individual data types, dataset-specific taxonomic structures capture unique data characteristics, while being generalizable across application domains. The creation of dataset-centric but domain-agnostic taxonomic structures is difficult, especially if best practices for a focused data type are still missing, observing experts is not feasible, and means for reflection and generalization are scarce. We discovered this need for methodological support when working with time-stamped event sequences, a datatype that has not yet been fully systematically studied in visualization research. To address this shortcoming, we present a methodology that enables researchers to abstract tasks and build dataset-centric taxonomic structures in five phases (data collection, coding, task categorization, task synthesis, and action-target(criterion) crosscut). We validate the methodology by applying it to time-stamped event sequences and present a task typology that uses triples as a novel language of description for tasks: (1) action, (2) data target, and (3) data criterion. We further evaluate the descriptive power of the typology with a real-world case on cybersecurity.

cs.GR↗

Visualizing Graph Neural Networks with CorGIE: Corresponding a Graph to Its Embedding

Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a class of powerful machine learning tools that model node relations for making predictions of nodes or links. GNN developers rely on quantitative metrics of the predictions to evaluate a GNN, but similar to many other neural networks, it is difficult for them to understand if the GNN truly learns characteristics of a graph as expected. We propose an approach to corresponding an input graph to its node embedding (aka latent space), a common component of GNNs that is later used for prediction. We abstract the data and tasks, and develop an interactive multi-view interface called CorGIE to instantiate the abstraction. As the key function in CorGIE, we propose the K-hop graph layout to show topological neighbors in hops and their clustering structure. To evaluate the functionality and usability of CorGIE, we present how to use CorGIE in two usage scenarios, and conduct a case study with five GNN experts.

cs.LG↗

Does the Layout Really Matter? A Study on Visual Model Accuracy Estimation

In visual interactive labeling, users iteratively assign labels to data items until the machine model reaches an acceptable accuracy. A crucial step of this process is to inspect the model's accuracy and decide whether it is necessary to label additional elements. In scenarios with no or very little labeled data, visual inspection of the predictions is required. Similarity-preserving scatterplots created through a dimensionality reduction algorithm are a common visualization that is used in these cases. Previous studies investigated the effects of layout and image complexity on tasks like labeling. However, model evaluation has not been studied systematically. We present the results of an experiment studying the influence of image complexity and visual grouping of images on model accuracy estimation. We found that users outperform traditional automated approaches when estimating a model's accuracy. Furthermore, while the complexity of images impacts the overall performance, the layout of the items in the plot has little to no effect on estimations.

cs.HC↗

ConfusionFlow: A model-agnostic visualization for temporal analysis of classifier confusion

Classifiers are among the most widely used supervised machine learning algorithms. Many classification models exist, and choosing the right one for a given task is difficult. During model selection and debugging, data scientists need to assess classifiers' performances, evaluate their learning behavior over time, and compare different models. Typically, this analysis is based on single-number performance measures such as accuracy. A more detailed evaluation of classifiers is possible by inspecting class errors. The confusion matrix is an established way for visualizing these class errors, but it was not designed with temporal or comparative analysis in mind. More generally, established performance analysis systems do not allow a combined temporal and comparative analysis of class-level information. To address this issue, we propose ConfusionFlow, an interactive, comparative visualization tool that combines the benefits of class confusion matrices with the visualization of performance characteristics over time. ConfusionFlow is model-agnostic and can be used to compare performances for different model types, model architectures, and/or training and test datasets. We demonstrate the usefulness of ConfusionFlow in a case study on instance selection strategies in active learning. We further assess the scalability of ConfusionFlow and present a use case in the context of neural network pruning.

cs.LG↗

Speculative Execution for Guided Visual Analytics

We propose the concept of Speculative Execution for Visual Analytics and discuss its effectiveness for model exploration and optimization. Speculative Execution enables the automatic generation of alternative, competing model configurations that do not alter the current model state unless explicitly confirmed by the user. These alternatives are computed based on either user interactions or model quality measures and can be explored using delta-visualizations. By automatically proposing modeling alternatives, systems employing Speculative Execution can shorten the gap between users and models, reduce the confirmation bias and speed up optimization processes. In this paper, we have assembled five application scenarios showcasing the potential of Speculative Execution, as well as a potential for further research.

cs.HC↗

Visual-Interactive Similarity Search for Complex Objects by Example of Soccer Player Analysis

The definition of similarity is a key prerequisite when analyzing complex data types in data mining, information retrieval, or machine learning. However, the meaningful definition is often hampered by the complexity of data objects and particularly by different notions of subjective similarity latent in targeted user groups. Taking the example of soccer players, we present a visual-interactive system that learns users' mental models of similarity. In a visual-interactive interface, users are able to label pairs of soccer players with respect to their subjective notion of similarity. Our proposed similarity model automatically learns the respective concept of similarity using an active learning strategy. A visual-interactive retrieval technique is provided to validate the model and to execute downstream retrieval tasks for soccer player analysis. The applicability of the approach is demonstrated in different evaluation strategies, including usage scenarions and cross-validation tests.

cs.LG↗