Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

Jürgen Giesl

Publications and source records attributed to Jürgen Giesl.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
arXiv2024

Targeting Completeness: Using Closed Forms for Size Bounds of Integer Programs

We present a new procedure to infer size bounds for integer programs automatically. Size bounds are important for the deduction of bounds on the runtime complexity or in general, for the resource analysis of programs. We show that our technique is complete (i.e., it always computes finite size bounds) for a subclass of loops, possibly with non-linear arithmetic. Moreover, we present a novel approach to combine and integrate this complete technique into an incomplete approach to infer size and runtime bounds of general integer programs. We prove completeness of our integration for an important subclass of integer programs. We implemented our new algorithm in the automated complexity analysis tool KoAT to evaluate its power, in particular on programs with non-linear arithmetic.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

Integrating Loop Acceleration into Bounded Model Checking

Bounded Model Checking (BMC) is a powerful technique for proving unsafety. However, finding deep counterexamples that require a large bound is challenging for BMC. On the other hand, acceleration techniques compute "shortcuts" that "compress" many execution steps into a single one. In this paper, we tightly integrate acceleration techniques into SMT-based bounded model checking. By adding suitable "shortcuts" on the fly, our approach can quickly detect deep counterexamples. Moreover, using so-called blocking clauses, our approach can prove safety of examples where BMC diverges. An empirical comparison with other state-of-the-art techniques shows that our approach is highly competitive for proving unsafety, and orthogonal to existing techniques for proving safety.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

Control-Flow Refinement for Complexity Analysis of Probabilistic Programs in KoAT

Recently, we showed how to use control-flow refinement (CFR) to improve automatic complexity analysis of integer programs. While up to now CFR was limited to classical programs, in this paper we extend CFR to probabilistic programs and show its soundness for complexity analysis. To demonstrate its benefits, we implemented our new CFR technique in our complexity analysis tool KoAT.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

A Dependency Pair Framework for Relative Termination of Term Rewriting

Dependency pairs are one of the most powerful techniques for proving termination of term rewrite systems (TRSs), and they are used in almost all tools for termination analysis of TRSs. Problem #106 of the RTA List of Open Problems asks for an adaption of dependency pairs for relative termination. Here, infinite rewrite sequences are allowed, but one wants to prove that a certain subset of the rewrite rules cannot be used infinitely often. Dependency pairs were recently adapted to annotated dependency pairs (ADPs) to prove almost-sure termination of probabilistic TRSs. In this paper, we develop a novel adaption of ADPs for relative termination. We implemented our new ADP framework in our tool AProVE and evaluate it in comparison to state-of-the-art tools for relative termination of TRSs.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

A Complete Dependency Pair Framework for Almost-Sure Innermost Termination of Probabilistic Term Rewriting

Recently, the well-known dependency pair (DP) framework was adapted to a dependency tuple framework in order to prove almost-sure innermost termination (iAST) of probabilistic term rewrite systems. While this approach was incomplete, in this paper, we improve it into a complete criterion for iAST by presenting a new, more elegant definition of DPs for probabilistic term rewriting. Based on this, we extend the probabilistic DP framework by new transformations. Our implementation in the tool AProVE shows that they increase its power considerably.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

Termination of Triangular Polynomial Loops

We consider the problem of proving termination for triangular weakly non-linear loops (twn-loops) over some ring $\mathcal{S}$ like $\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Q}$, or $\mathbb{R}$. The guard of such a loop is an arbitrary quantifier-free Boolean formula over (possibly non-linear) polynomial inequations, and the body is a single assignment of the form $(x_1, \ldots, x_d) \longleftarrow (c_1 \cdot x_1 + p_1, \ldots, c_d \cdot x_d + p_d)$ where each $x_i$ is a variable, $c_i \in \mathcal{S}$, and each $p_i$ is a (possibly non-linear) polynomial over $\mathcal{S}$ and the variables $x_{i+1},\ldots,x_{d}$. We show that the question of termination can be reduced to the existential fragment of the first-order theory of $\mathcal{S}$. For loops over $\mathbb{R}$, our reduction implies decidability of termination. For loops over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$, it proves semi-decidability of non-termination. Furthermore, we present a transformation to convert certain non-twn-loops into twn-form. Then the original loop terminates iff the transformed loop terminates over a specific subset of $\mathbb{R}$, which can also be checked via our reduction. Moreover, we formalize a technique to linearize (the updates of) twn-loops in our setting and analyze its complexity. Based on these results, we prove complexity bounds for the termination problem of twn-loops as well as tight bounds for two important classes of loops which can always be transformed into twn-loops. Finally, we show that there is an important class of linear loops where our decision procedure results in an efficient procedure for termination analysis, i.e., where the parameterized complexity of deciding termination is polynomial.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2024

From Innermost to Full Almost-Sure Termination of Probabilistic Term Rewriting

There are many evaluation strategies for term rewrite systems, but proving termination automatically is usually easiest for innermost rewriting. Several syntactic criteria exist when innermost termination implies full termination. We adapt these criteria to the probabilistic setting, e.g., we show when it suffices to analyze almost-sure termination (AST) w.r.t. innermost rewriting to prove full AST of probabilistic term rewrite systems (PTRSs). These criteria also apply to other notions of termination like positive AST. We implemented and evaluated our new contributions in the tool AProVE.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2023

Automated Termination Proofs for C Programs with Lists (Short WST Version)

There are many techniques and tools for termination of C programs, but up to now they were not very powerful for termination proofs of programs whose termination depends on recursive data structures like lists. We present the first approach that extends powerful techniques for termination analysis of C programs (with memory allocation and explicit pointer arithmetic) to lists.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2023

Automated Complexity Analysis of Integer Programs via Triangular Weakly Non-Linear Loops (Short WST Version)

There exist several results on deciding termination and computing runtime bounds for triangular weakly non-linear loops (twn-loops). We show how to use results on such subclasses of programs where complexity bounds are computable within incomplete approaches for complexity analysis of full integer programs. To this end, we present a novel modular approach which computes local runtime bounds for subprograms which can be transformed into twn-loops. These local runtime bounds are then lifted to global runtime bounds for the whole program. The power of our approach is shown by our implementation in the tool KoAT which analyzes complexity of programs where all other state-of-the-art tools fail.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2023

ADCL: Acceleration Driven Clause Learning for Constrained Horn Clauses

Constrained Horn Clauses (CHCs) are often used in automated program verification. Thus, techniques for (dis-)proving satisfiability of CHCs are a very active field of research. On the other hand, acceleration techniques for computing formulas that characterize the N-fold closure of loops have successfully been used for static program analysis. We show how to use acceleration to avoid repeated derivations with recursive CHCs in resolution proofs, which reduces the length of the proofs drastically. This idea gives rise to a novel calculus for (dis)proving satisfiability of CHCs, called Acceleration Driven Clause Learning (ADCL). We implemented this new calculus in our tool LoAT and evaluate it empirically in comparison to other state-of-the-art tools.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2023

Proving Non-Termination by Acceleration Driven Clause Learning

We recently proposed Acceleration Driven Clause Learning (ADCL), a novel calculus to analyze satisfiability of Constrained Horn Clauses (CHCs). Here, we adapt ADCL to transition systems and introduce ADCL-NT, a variant for disproving termination. We implemented ADCL-NT in our tool LoAT and evaluate it against the state of the art.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2023

Proving Termination of C Programs with Lists

There are many techniques and tools to prove termination of C programs, but up to now these tools were not very powerful for fully automated termination proofs of programs whose termination depends on recursive data structures like lists. We present the first approach that extends powerful techniques for termination analysis of C programs (with memory allocation and explicit pointer arithmetic) to lists.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2022

Improving Automatic Complexity Analysis of Integer Programs

In earlier work, we developed an approach for automatic complexity analysis of integer programs, based on an alternating modular inference of upper runtime and size bounds for program parts. In this paper, we show how recent techniques to improve automated termination analysis of integer programs (like the generation of multiphase-linear ranking functions and control-flow refinement) can be integrated into our approach for the inference of runtime bounds. The power of the resulting approach is demonstrated by an extensive experimental evaluation with our new re-implementation of the corresponding tool KoAT.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2022

Proving Non-Termination and Lower Runtime Bounds with LoAT (System Description)

We present the new version of the Loop Acceleration Tool (LoAT), a powerful tool for proving non-termination and worst-case lower bounds for programs operating on integers. It is based on a novel calculus for loop acceleration, i.e., transforming loops into non-deterministic straight-line code, and for finding non-terminating configurations. To implement it efficiently, LoAT uses a new approach based on SMT solving and unsat cores. An extensive evaluation shows that LoAT is highly competitive with other state-of-the-art tools for proving non-termination. While no other tool is able to deduce worst-case lower bounds for full integer programs, we also demonstrate that LoAT significantly outperforms its predecessors.

cs.LO↗
arXiv2021

Aiming Low Is Harder -- Induction for Lower Bounds in Probabilistic Program Verification

We present a new inductive rule for verifying lower bounds on expected values of random variables after execution of probabilistic loops as well as on their expected runtimes. Our rule is simple in the sense that loop body semantics need to be applied only finitely often in order to verify that the candidates are indeed lower bounds. In particular, it is not necessary to find the limit of a sequence as in many previous rules.

cs.LO↗