Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

J. Alberto Vázquez

Publications and source records attributed to J. Alberto Vázquez.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Core-Halo Mass Relation in Scalar Field Dark Matter Models and its Consequences for the Formation of Supermassive Black Holes

Scalar-field dark matter (SFDM) halos exhibit a core-envelope structure with soliton-like cores and CDM-like envelopes. Simulations without self-interaction (free-field case) report a core-halo mass relation $M_c\propto M_{h}^β$, with either $β=1/3$ or $β=5/9$, which can be understood if core and halo obey certain energy or velocity scalings. We extend the core-halo mass relations to include SFDM with self-interaction (SI), either repulsive or attractive, and investigate its implications for the gravitational instability and collapse of solitonic cores, leading to supermassive black hole (SMBH) formation. For SFDM parameters that make $\sim$ Kpc-sized cores and CDM-like structure formation on large scales but suppressed on small scales, cores are stable for all galactic halos of interest, from the free-field to the repulsive SI limit. For attractive SI, however, halos masses $M_h\sim (10^{10}-10^{12}) M_\odot$ have cores that collapse to SMBHs with $M_{SMBH}\sim 10^{6}-10^8 M_\odot$, as observations seem to require, while smaller-mass halos have stable cores, for particle masses $m\simeq (2.14\times 10^{-22}-9.9\times 10^{-20})\rm{eV}/c^2$, if the free-field has $β=1/3$, or $m = 2.23\times 10^{-21}-1.7\times 10^{-18}\rm{eV}/c^2$, if $β=5/9$. For free-field and repulsive cases, however, if previous constraints on particle parameters are relaxed to allow much smaller (sub-galactic scale) cores, then halos can also form SMBHs, for the same range of halo and BH masses, as long as $β= 5/9$ is correct for the free-field. In that case, structure formation in SFDM would be largely indistinguishable from Cold Dark Matter (CDM). Such SFDM models might not resolve the small-scale structure problems of CDM, but they would explain the formation of SMBHs quite naturally. Since CDM, itself, has not yet been ruled out, such SFDM models must also be viable (Abbreviated).

astro-ph.GA↗

Bayesian model selection on Scalar $ε$-Field Dark Energy

The main aim of this paper is to analyse minimally-coupled scalar-fields -- quintessence and phantom -- as the main candidates to explain the accelerated expansion of the universe and compare its observables to current cosmological observations; as a byproduct we present its python module. This work includes a parameter $ε$ which allows to incorporate both quintessence and phantom fields within the same analysis. Examples of the potentials, so far included, are $V(ϕ)=V_0ϕ^μe^{βϕ^α}$ and $V(ϕ)=V_0(\cosh(αϕ)+β)$ with $α$, $μ$ and $β$ being free parameters, but the analysis can be easily extended to any other scalar field potential. Additional to the field component and the standard content of matter, the study also incorporates the contribution from spatial curvature ($Ω_k$), as it has been the focus in recent studies. The analysis contains the most up-to-date datasets along with a nested sampler to produce posterior distributions along with the Bayesian evidence, that allows to perform a model selection. In this work we constrain the parameter-space describing the two generic potentials, and among several combinations, we found that the best-fit to current datasets is given by a model slightly favouring the quintessence field with potential $V(ϕ)=V_0ϕ^μe^{βϕ}$ with $β=0.22\pm 1.56$, $μ= -0.41\pm 1.90$, and slightly negative curvature $Ω_{k,0}=-0.0016\pm0.0018$, which presents deviations of $1.6σ$ from the standard $Λ$CDM model. Even though this potential contains three extra parameters, the Bayesian evidence $\mathcal{B}_{Λ, ϕ} =2.0$ is unable to distinguish this model compared to the $Λ$CDM with curvature ($Ω_{k,0}=0.0013\pm0.0018$). The potential that provides the minimal Bayesian evidence corresponds to $V(ϕ)=V_0 \cosh(αϕ)$ with $α=-0.61\pm 1.36$.

gr-qc↗

A simple supergravity model of inflation constrained with Planck 2018 data

We study a model of inflation based on $\mathcal{N}=1$ supergravity essentially depending on one effective parameter. Under a field transformation we show that this model turns out to be equivalent to a previously studied supergravity model known to be ruled out with the original choice of the parameter. Such parameter measures the slope of the potential at observable scales. Through a Bayesian parameter estimation, it is shown how this model is compatible with recent CMB temperature measurements by {\it Planck 2018} giving rise to a simple, viable, single field model of inflation. The tensor to scalar ratio constraint is found to be $r_{0.002}<0.065$ with negative running. We discuss how observables are invariant under the field transformation which leaves unaltered the slow-roll parameters. As a consequence the use of one presentation of the model or its field-transformed version is purely a matter of convenience.

astro-ph.CO↗

Scalar Field Dark Matter Spectator During Inflation: The Effect of Self-interaction

Nowadays cosmological inflation is the most accepted mechanism to explain the primordial seeds that led to the structure formation observed in the Universe. Current observations are in well agreement to initial adiabatic conditions, which imply that single-scalar-field inflation may be enough to describe the early Universe. However, there are several scenarios where the existence of more than a single field could be relevant during this period, for instance, the situation where the so-called spectator is present. Within the spectator scenario we can find the possibility that an ultra-light scalar field dark matter candidate could coexist with the inflaton. In this work we study this possibility where the additional scalar field could be massive or self-interacting. We use isocurvature observations to constrain the free parameters of the model.

astro-ph.CO↗