Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

J. E. Chavez-Saab

Publications and source records attributed to J. E. Chavez-Saab.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

$R_{D^*}$ or $R_{Dπ}$: closing the theoretical gap?

Measurements of the $R_{D^*}$ parameter remain in tension with the standard model prediction, despite recent results helping to close the gap. In this work, we revisit the standard model considerations for the prediction. We pay particular attention to the theoretical prediction considering the full 4-body decay $(B\rightarrow lνD^* \to lνDπ)$, which introduces the longitudinal degree of freedom of the $D^*$. We show that this does not introduce sizeable effects at the current precision. This modifies our previous finding (Phys. Rev. D 98 056014 (2018)) where a numerical bug led us to a different conclusion. Thus, the results on $R_{Dπ}$ are consistent with $R_{D^*}$, and the difference between the several values can be traced back to the form factor used and the restrictions incorporated to determine their parameters. There is still tension between the experimental world average and the most accurate theoretical estimate, leaving the possibility of presence of new physics scenarios open.

hep-ph↗

Closing the Gap on $R_{D^*}$ by including longitudinal effects

Measurements of the $R_{D^*}\equiv\mathrm{Br}(B\rightarrow τνD^*)/\mathrm{Br}(B\rightarrow eνD^*)$ parameter remain in tension with the standard model prediction, despite recent results helping to close the gap. The standard model prediction it is compared with considers the $D^*$ as an external particle, even though what is detected in experiments is a $Dπ$ pair it decays into, from which it is reconstructed. We argue that the experimental result must be compared with the theoretical prediction considering the full 4-body decay $(B\rightarrow lνD^* \to lνDπ)$. We show that the longitudinal degree of freedom of the off-shell $D^*$ helps to further close the disagreement gap with experimental data. We find values for the ratio $R_{Dπ}^l \equiv {\mathrm{Br}(B\rightarrow τν_τD π)}/\mathrm{Br}(B\rightarrow lν_l Dπ)$ of $R_{Dπ}^e=0.274\pm0.003$ and $R_{Dπ}^μ=0.275\pm0.003$, where the uncertainty comes from the uncertainty of the form factors parameters. Comparing against $R_{Dπ}$ reduces the gap with the latest LHCb result from $1.1σ$ to $0.48σ$, while the gap with the latest Belle result is reduced from $0.42σ$ to just $0.10σ$ and with the world average results from $3.7σ$ to $2.1σ$. Erratum added at the end of the file.

hep-ph↗