arXiv subjects

J. Handt

Publications and source records attributed to J. Handt.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2019

Molecular dissociation in few-cycle laser pulses: From attosecond to femtosecond pulse duration

The dissociation dynamics of diatomic molecules interacting with (near) optical laser pulses of different duration is investigated by an elaborate discussion of the electric field of the laser and by a direct solution of the time-dependent molecular Schr\"odinger equation. The systematic variation of the pulse duration from the electronic time scale (attoseconds) to the nuclear time scale (femtoseconds) shows that the employed few-cycle laser pulses lead to well-known but quite different dissociation mechanisms. A comparative calculation with a model pulse and an experimentally realized attosecond pulse emphasizes that, and to what extent, a realistic modeling of the electric field is of central importance in the attosecond regime.

physics.atom-ph↗

arXiv2016

Surface hopping methodology in laser-driven molecular dynamics

A theoretical justification of the empirical surface hopping method for the laser-driven molecular dynamics is given utilizing the formalism of the exact factorization of the molecular wavefunction [Abedi et al., PRL $\textbf{105}$, 123002 (2010)] in its quantum-classical limit. Employing an exactly solvable $\textrm H_2^{\;+}$-like model system, it is shown that the deterministic classical nuclear motion on a single time-dependent surface in this approach describes the same physics as stochastic (hopping-induced) motion on several surfaces, provided Floquet surfaces are applied. Both quantum-classical methods do describe reasonably well the exact nuclear wavepacket dynamics for extremely different dissociation scenarios. Hopping schemes using Born-Oppenheimer surfaces or instantaneous Born-Oppenheimer surfaces fail completely.

physics.chem-ph↗

arXiv2013

Orientation dependence of energy absorption and relaxation dynamics of $\text{C}_{60}$ in fs-laser pulses: How round is $\text{C}_{60}$?

By means of non-adiabatic quantum molecular dynamics it is shown, that the amount of energy deposited into $\text{C}_{60}$ by a short laser field strongly depends on the molecular orientation with respect to the laser polarization direction. In consequence, subsequent electron-vibration coupling leads to different nuclear relaxation mechanisms with mainly three pathways: (1) excitation of giant $\text{A}_g(1)$ modes ("breathing"), (2) formation of deformed cage-like complexes ("isomers"), fragmentation predominantly into two large pieces ("fission"). The results are in accord with and explain nicely already existing experimental data. Future experiments are proposed to confirm the detailed predictions.

physics.atm-clus↗

arXiv2011

Complete dynamics of H2+ in strong laser fields

Based on a combined quantum-classical treatment, a complete study of the strong field dynamics of H2+, i.e. including all nuclear and electronic DOF as well as dissociation and ionization, is presented. We find that the ro-vibrational nuclear dynamics enhances dissociation and, at the same time, suppresses ionization, confirming experimental observations by I. Ben-Itzhak et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 073002 (2005)]. In addition and counter-intuitively, it is shown that for large initial vibrational excitation ionization takes place favorably at large angles between the laser polarization and molecular axis. A local ionization model delivers a transparent explanation of these findings.

physics.atm-clus↗

arXiv2000

GNO Solar Neutrino Observations: Results for GNOI

We report the first GNO solar neutrino results for the measuring period GNOI, solar exposure time May 20, 1998 till January 12, 2000. In the present analysis, counting results for solar runs SR1 - SR19 were used till April 4, 2000. With counting completed for all but the last 3 runs (SR17 - SR19), the GNO I result is [65.8 +10.2 -9.6 (stat.) +3.4 -3.6 (syst.)]SNU (1sigma) or [65.8 + 10.7 -10.2 (incl. syst.)]SNU (1sigma) with errors combined. This may be compared to the result for Gallex(I-IV), which is [77.5 +7.6 -7.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma). A combined result from both GNOI and Gallex(I-IV) together is [74.1 + 6.7 -6.8 (incl. syst.)] SNU (1sigma).

hep-ex↗