arXiv subjects

J. Harnois-Déraps

Publications and source records attributed to J. Harnois-Déraps.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

KiDS-Legacy: Joint analysis of second- and third-order cosmic shear

Weak lensing by large-scale structure is a powerful cosmological probe. While most analyses rely on second-order correlations, these are primarily sensitive to the parameter combination $S_8 = σ_8 (Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5}$, limiting their ability to constrain $Ω_m$ and other cosmological parameters independently. Higher-order statistics capture non-Gaussian features of the density field and can therefore break parameter degeneracies and extract more cosmological information from weak lensing surveys. We present a joint analysis of second- and third-order cosmic shear in the final data release of the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-Legacy). We combine COSEBIs (Complete Orthogonal Sets of E-/B-mode Integrals) at scales between 2' and 300' with third-order aperture mass moments at scales between 4' and 32' to perform a joint analysis of second- and third-order statistics. Compared to previous KiDS analyses, we implement several methodological advances: an intrinsic alignment model with redshift and mass dependence, a baryon correction model validated on multiple hydrodynamical simulations, and corrections for reduced shear and source clustering. Combining COSEBIs with third-order aperture mass statistics in KiDS-Legacy yields $Ω_m = 0.297^{+0.056}_{-0.040}$ and $S_8 = 0.806^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$, significantly tightening the $Ω_m$ constraints and more than doubling the figure of merit in the $Ω_m$--$S_8$ plane compared to the two-point analysis alone. The third-order measurements pass stringent internal consistency tests, are fully compatible with the KiDS-Legacy 2-point constraints, other 2+3-point lensing results and with Planck CMB measurements within $1σ$, providing no evidence for an $S_8$ tension and demonstrating the maturity of 3-point cosmic shear as a key probe for forthcoming surveys.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

Optimization of Weak Lensing Lightcone Simulations for Higher-Order Statistics in the LSST era

We present a framework for generating lightcone simulations tailored to the analysis of Stage-IV cosmic shear data using Higher-Order Statistics (HOS). We revisit key design choices from previous simulation campaigns and re-optimize several internal parameters, benchmarking accuracy through changes in $χ^2$ of cosmic shear statistics under survey conditions mimicking 10 years of observations from the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We find that discretizing the lightcone uniformly in scale factor yields higher accuracy than commonly adopted schemes such as uniform spacing in redshift or comoving distance. While $N_{\rm part} = 1024^3$ simulation particles (corresponding to a mass resolution of $m_{\rm part} = 2.08\times10^{10}M_\odot$) is sufficient to model two-point statistics up to $\ell = 5000$, we observed significant instabilities on our full suite of HOS as the number of mass shells used in the lightcone construction, $N_{\rm shells}$, is varied. In contrast, simulations with $N_{\rm part} = 2048^3$ particles ($m_{\rm part} = 2.60\times10^{9}M_\odot$) robustly reproduce all statistics considered. In this higher-resolution configuration, $N_{\rm shells}$ can be reduced to $\sim50$ with only minor deviations, no larger than $0.1-0.3σ$ relative to our highest-resolution case ($N_{\rm shells}\sim100$). This has been explicitly verified through a comparison between our fiducial lightcone production mode based on slicing particle snapshots and an exact lightcone mode where individual particle trajectories are solved for at runtime. We further show that the particle density per pixel can be downsampled by a significant amount for $z>1.5$, saving large computational resources with no impact on the resulting statistics. These results guide the design of upcoming simulation campaigns geared towards forward-modeling and emulation-based analyses of Stage-IV data.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2026

Euclid preparation. LXXXV. Toward a DR1 application of higher-order weak lensing statistics

This is the second paper in the HOWLS (higher-order weak lensing statistics) series exploring the usage of non-Gaussian statistics for cosmology inference within Euclid. With respect to our first paper, we develop a full tomographic analysis based on realistic photometric redshifts that allows us to derive Fisher forecasts in the ($σ_8$, $w_0$) plane for a Euclid-like data release 1 (DR1) setup. We find that the five higher-order statistics (HOS) that satisfy the Gaussian likelihood assumption of the Fisher formalism (one-point probability distribution function, $\ell$1-norm, peak counts, Minkowski functionals, and Betti numbers) each outperform the shear two-point correlation functions by a factor of $2.5$ on the $w_0$ forecasts, with only marginal improvement when used in combination with two-point estimators, suggesting that every HOS is able to retrieve both the non-Gaussian and Gaussian information of the matter density field. The similar performance of the different estimators is explained by a homogeneous use of multi-scale and tomographic information, optimized to lower computational costs. These results hold for the three mass mapping techniques of the Euclid pipeline, aperture mass, Kaiser--Squires, and Kaiser--Squires plus, and they are unaffected by the application of realistic star masks. Finally, we explored the use of HOS with the Bernardeau--Nishimichi--Taruya (BNT) nulling scheme approach, finding promising results toward applying physical scale cuts to HOS.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2025

Non-linear infusion of intrinsic alignment and source clustering: impact on non-Gaussian cosmic shear statistics

Intrinsic alignments (IA) of galaxies is one of the key secondary signals to cosmic shear measurements, and must be modeled to interpret weak lensing data and infer the correct cosmology. There are large uncertainties in the physical description of IA, and analytical calculations are often out of reach for weak lensing statistics beyond two-point functions. We present here a set of six flexible IA models infused directly into weak lensing simulations, constructed from the mass shells, the projected tidal fields and, optionally, dark matter halo catalogues. We start with the non-linear linear alignment (NLA) and progressively sophisticate the galaxy bias and the tidal coupling models, including the commonly-used extended NLA (also known as the e-NLA or $δ$-NLA) and the tidal torque (TT) models. We validate our methods with MCMC analyses from two-point shear statistics, then compute the impact on non-Gaussian cosmic shear probes from these catalogues as well as from reconstructed convergence maps. We find that the $δ$-NLA model has by far the largest impact on most probes, at times more than twice the strength of the NLA. We also observe large differences between the IA models in under-dense regions, which makes minima, void profiles and lensing PDF the best probes for model rejection. Furthermore, our bias models allow us to separately study the source-clustering term for each of these probes, finding good agreement with the existing literature, and extending the results to these new probes. The third-order aperture mass statistics ($M^3_{ap}$) and the integrated three-point functions are particularly sensitive to this when including low-redshift data, often exceeding a 20% impact on the data vector. Our IA models are straightforward to implement and rescale from a single simulated IA-infused galaxy catalogue, allowing for fast model exploration.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2023

Euclid Preparation. XXVIII. Forecasts for ten different higher-order weak lensing statistics

Recent cosmic shear studies have shown that higher-order statistics (HOS) developed by independent teams now outperform standard two-point estimators in terms of statistical precision thanks to their sensitivity to the non-Gaussian features of large-scale structure. The aim of the Higher-Order Weak Lensing Statistics (HOWLS) project is to assess, compare, and combine the constraining power of ten different HOS on a common set of $Euclid$-like mocks, derived from N-body simulations. In this first paper of the HOWLS series, we computed the nontomographic ($Ω_{\rm m}$, $σ_8$) Fisher information for the one-point probability distribution function, peak counts, Minkowski functionals, Betti numbers, persistent homology Betti numbers and heatmap, and scattering transform coefficients, and we compare them to the shear and convergence two-point correlation functions in the absence of any systematic bias. We also include forecasts for three implementations of higher-order moments, but these cannot be robustly interpreted as the Gaussian likelihood assumption breaks down for these statistics. Taken individually, we find that each HOS outperforms the two-point statistics by a factor of around two in the precision of the forecasts with some variations across statistics and cosmological parameters. When combining all the HOS, this increases to a $4.5$ times improvement, highlighting the immense potential of HOS for cosmic shear cosmological analyses with $Euclid$. The data used in this analysis are publicly released with the paper.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2016

KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing

We present cosmological parameter constraints from a tomographic weak gravitational lensing analysis of ~450deg$^2$ of imaging data from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS). For a flat $Λ$CDM cosmology with a prior on $H_0$ that encompasses the most recent direct measurements, we find $S_8\equivσ_8\sqrt{Ω_{\rm m}/0.3}=0.745\pm0.039$. This result is in good agreement with other low redshift probes of large scale structure, including recent cosmic shear results, along with pre-Planck cosmic microwave background constraints. A $2.3$-$σ$ tension in $S_8$ and `substantial discordance' in the full parameter space is found with respect to the Planck 2015 results. We use shear measurements for nearly 15 million galaxies, determined with a new improved `self-calibrating' version of $lens$fit validated using an extensive suite of image simulations. Four-band $ugri$ photometric redshifts are calibrated directly with deep spectroscopic surveys. The redshift calibration is confirmed using two independent techniques based on angular cross-correlations and the properties of the photometric redshift probability distributions. Our covariance matrix is determined using an analytical approach, verified numerically with large mock galaxy catalogues. We account for uncertainties in the modelling of intrinsic galaxy alignments and the impact of baryon feedback on the shape of the non-linear matter power spectrum, in addition to the small residual uncertainties in the shear and redshift calibration. The cosmology analysis was performed blind. Our high-level data products, including shear correlation functions, covariance matrices, redshift distributions, and Monte Carlo Markov Chains are available at http://kids.strw.leidenuniv.nl.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2016

RCSLenS: The Red Cluster Sequence Lensing Survey

We present the Red-sequence Cluster Lensing Survey (RCSLenS), an application of the methods developed for the Canada France Hawaii Telescope Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) to the ~785deg$^2$, multi-band imaging data of the Red-sequence Cluster Survey 2 (RCS2). This project represents the largest public, sub-arcsecond seeing, multi-band survey to date that is suited for weak gravitational lensing measurements. With a careful assessment of systematic errors in shape measurements and photometric redshifts we extend the use of this data set to allow cross-correlation analyses between weak lensing observables and other data sets. We describe the imaging data, the data reduction, masking, multi-colour photometry, photometric redshifts, shape measurements, tests for systematic errors, and a blinding scheme to allow for more objective measurements. In total we analyse 761 pointings with r-band coverage, which constitutes our lensing sample. Residual large-scale B-mode systematics prevent the use of this shear catalogue for cosmic shear science. The effective number density of lensing sources over an unmasked area of 571.7deg$^2$ and down to a magnitude limit of r~24.5 is 8.1 galaxies per arcmin$^2$ (weighted: 5.5 arcmin$^{-2}$) distributed over 14 patches on the sky. Photometric redshifts based on 4-band griz data are available for 513 pointings covering an unmasked area of 383.5 deg$^2$ We present weak lensing mass reconstructions of some example clusters as well as the full survey representing the largest areas that have been mapped in this way. All our data products are publicly available through CADC at http://www.cadc-ccda.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/en/community/rcslens/query.html in a format very similar to the CFHTLenS data release.

astro-ph.CO↗

arXiv2015

CFHTLenS: A Gaussian likelihood is a sufficient approximation for a cosmological analysis of third-order cosmic shear statistics

We study the correlations of the shear signal between triplets of sources in the Canada-France-Hawaii Lensing Survey (CFHTLenS) to probe cosmological parameters via the matter bispectrum. In contrast to previous studies, we adopted a non-Gaussian model of the data likelihood which is supported by our simulations of the survey. We find that for state-of-the-art surveys, similar to CFHTLenS, a Gaussian likelihood analysis is a reasonable approximation, albeit small differences in the parameter constraints are already visible. For future surveys we expect that a Gaussian model becomes inaccurate. Our algorithm for a refined non-Gaussian analysis and data compression is then of great utility especially because it is not much more elaborate if simulated data are available. Applying this algorithm to the third-order correlations of shear alone in a blind analysis, we find a good agreement with the standard cosmological model: $Σ_8$=$σ_8$ $(Ω_{\rm m}/0.27)^{0.64}$=$0.79^{+0.08}_{-0.11}$ for a flat $Λ\rm CDM$ cosmology with $h=0.7\pm0.04$ ($68\%$ credible interval). Nevertheless our models provide only moderately good fits as indicated by $χ^2/{\rm dof}=2.9$, including a $20\%$ r.m.s. uncertainty in the predicted signal amplitude. The models cannot explain a signal drop on scales around 15 arcmin, which may be caused by systematics. It is unclear whether the discrepancy can be fully explained by residual PSF systematics of which we find evidence at least on scales of a few arcmin. Therefore we need a better understanding of higher-order correlations of cosmic shear and their systematics to confidently apply them as cosmological probes.

astro-ph.CO↗