SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jackson Abascal

Publications and source records attributed to Jackson Abascal.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Strongly refuting all semi-random Boolean CSPs

We give an efficient algorithm to strongly refute \emph{semi-random} instances of all Boolean constraint satisfaction problems. The number of constraints required by our algorithm matches (up to polylogarithmic factors) the best-known bounds for efficient refutation of fully random instances. Our main technical contribution is an algorithm to strongly refute semi-random instances of the Boolean $k$-XOR problem on $n$ variables that have $\widetilde{O}(n^{k/2})$ constraints. (In a semi-random $k$-XOR instance, the equations can be arbitrary and only the right-hand sides are random.) One of our key insights is to identify a simple combinatorial property of random XOR instances that makes spectral refutation work. Our approach involves taking an instance that does not satisfy this property (i.e., is \emph{not} pseudorandom) and reducing it to a partitioned collection of $2$-XOR instances. We analyze these subinstances using a carefully chosen quadratic form as a proxy, which in turn is bounded via a combination of spectral methods and semidefinite programming. The analysis of our spectral bounds relies only on an off-the-shelf matrix Bernstein inequality. Even for the purely random case, this leads to a shorter proof compared to the ones in the literature that rely on problem-specific trace-moment computations.

cs.CC

A Non-iterative Parallelizable Eigenbasis Algorithm for Johnson Graphs

We present a new $O(k^2 \binom{n}{k}^2)$ method for generating an orthogonal basis of eigenvectors for the Johnson graph $J(n,k)$. Unlike standard methods for computing a full eigenbasis of sparse symmetric matrices, the algorithm presented here is non-iterative, and produces exact results under an infinite-precision computation model. In addition, our method is highly parallelizable; given access to unlimited parallel processors, the eigenbasis can be constructed in only $O(n)$ time given n and k. We also present an algorithm for computing projections onto the eigenspaces of $J(n,k)$ in parallel time $O(n)$.

cs.DS

Critique of Barbosa's "P != NP Proof"

We review Andr\'e Luiz Barbosa's paper "P != NP Proof," in which the classes P and NP are generalized and claimed to be proven separate. We highlight inherent ambiguities in Barbosa's definitions, and show that attempts to resolve this ambiguity lead to flaws in the proof of his main result.

cs.CC

A Refutation of Guinea's "Understanding SAT is in P"

In this work, we summarize and critique the paper "Understanding SAT is in P" by Alejandro S\'anchez Guinea [arXiv:1504.00337]. The paper claims to present a polynomial-time solution for the NP-complete language 3-SAT. We show that Guinea's algorithm is flawed and does not prove 3-SAT is in P.

cs.CC

Closure and Nonclosure Properties of the Compressible and Rankable Sets

The rankable and compressible sets have been studied for more than a quarter of a century, ever since Allender [1] and Goldberg and Sipser [6] introduced the formal study of polynomial-time ranking. Yet even after all that time, whether the rankable and compressible sets are closed under the most important boolean and other operations remains essentially unexplored. The present paper studies these questions for both polynomial-time and recursion-theoretic compression and ranking, and for almost every case arrives at a Closed, a Not-Closed, or a Closed-Iff-Well-Known-Complexity-Classes-Collapse result for the given operation. Even though compression and ranking classes are capturing something quite natural about the structure of sets, it turns out that they are quite fragile with respect to closure properties, and many fail to possess even the most basic of closure properties. For example, we show that with respect to the join (aka disjoint union) operation: the P-rankable sets are not closed, whether the semistrongly P-rankable sets are closed is closely linked to whether P = UP $\cap$ coUP, and the strongly P-rankable sets are closed.

cs.LO