SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jacob Fox

Publications and source records attributed to Jacob Fox.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Subset sums, completeness and colorings

We develop novel techniques which allow us to prove a diverse range of results relating to subset sums and complete sequences of positive integers, including solutions to several longstanding open problems. These include: solutions to the three problems of Burr and Erdős on Ramsey complete sequences, for which Erdős later offered a combined total of \$350; analogous results for the new notion of density complete sequences; the solution to a conjecture of Alon and Erdős on the minimum number of colors needed to color the positive integers less than $n$ so that $n$ cannot be written as a monochromatic sum; the exact determination of an extremal function introduced by Erdős and Graham on sets of integers avoiding a given subset sum; and, answering a question reiterated by several authors, a homogeneous strengthening of a seminal result of Szemerédi and Vu on long arithmetic progressions in subset sums.

math.CO

Discrepancy in modular arithmetic progressions

Celebrated theorems of Roth and of Matoušek and Spencer together show that the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in the first $n$ positive integers is $Θ(n^{1/4})$. We study the analogous problem in the $\mathbb{Z}_n$ setting. We asymptotically determine the logarithm of the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ for all positive integer $n$. We further determine up to a constant factor the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ for many $n$. For example, if $n=p^k$ is a prime power, then the discrepancy of arithmetic progressions in $\mathbb{Z}_n$ is $Θ(n^{1/3+r_k/(6k)})$, where $r_k \in \{0,1,2\}$ is the remainder when $k$ is divided by $3$. This solves a problem of Hebbinghaus and Srivastav.

math.CO

Sunflowers in set systems of bounded dimension

Given a family $\mathcal F$ of $k$-element sets, $S_1,\ldots,S_r\in\mathcal F$ form an {\em $r$-sunflower} if $S_i \cap S_j =S_{i'} \cap S_{j'}$ for all $i \neq j$ and $i' \neq j'$. According to a famous conjecture of Erd\H os and Rado (1960), there is a constant $c=c(r)$ such that if $|\mathcal F|\ge c^k$, then $\mathcal F$ contains an $r$-sunflower. We come close to proving this conjecture for families of bounded {\em Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension}, VC-dim$(\mathcal F)\le d$. In this case, we show that $r$-sunflowers exist under the slightly stronger assumption $|\mathcal F|\ge2^{10k(dr)^{2\log^{*} k}}$. Here, $\log^*$ denotes the iterated logarithm function. We also verify the Erd\H os-Rado conjecture for families $\mathcal F$ of bounded {\em Littlestone dimension} and for some geometrically defined set systems.

math.CO

Making an $H$-Free Graph $k$-Colorable

We study the following question: how few edges can we delete from any $H$-free graph on $n$ vertices in order to make the resulting graph $k$-colorable? It turns out that various classical problems in extremal graph theory are special cases of this question. For $H$ any fixed odd cycle, we determine the answer up to a constant factor when $n$ is sufficiently large. We also prove an upper bound when $H$ is a fixed clique that we conjecture is tight up to a constant factor, and prove upper bounds for more general families of graphs. We apply our results to get a new bound on the maximum cut of graphs with a forbidden odd cycle in terms of the number of edges.

math.CO

Independent sets in hypergraphs with a forbidden link

We give a probabilistic construction of a $3$-uniform hypergraph on $N$ vertices with independence number $O(\log N / \log \log N)$ in which there are at most two edges among any four vertices. This bound is tight and solves a longstanding open problem of Erdős and Hajnal in Ramsey theory. We further extend this result to prove tight bounds on various other hypergraph Ramsey numbers.

math.CO

On the inducibility problem for random Cayley graphs of abelian groups with a few deleted vertices

Given a $k$-vertex graph $H$ and an integer $n$, what are the $n$-vertex graphs with the maximum number of induced copies of $H$? This question is closely related to the inducibility problem introduced by Pippenger and Golumbic in 1975, which asks for the maximum possible fraction of $k$-vertex subsets of an $n$-vertex graph that induce a copy of $H$. Huang, Lee and the first author proved that for a random $k$-vertex graph $H$, almost surely the $n$-vertex graphs maximizing the number of induced copies of $H$ are the balanced iterated blow-ups of $H$. In this paper, we consider the case where the graph $H$ is obtained by deleting a small number of vertices from a random Cayley graph $\widetilde{H}$ of an abelian group. We prove that in this case, almost surely all $n$-vertex graphs maximizing the number of induced copies of $H$ are balanced iterated blow-ups of $\widetilde{H}$.

math.CO

Powers of paths in tournaments

In this short note we prove that every tournament contains the $k$-th power of a directed path of linear length. This improves upon recent results of Yuster and of Girão. We also give a complete solution for this problem when $k=2$, showing that there is always a square of a directed path of length $\lceil 2n/3 \rceil-1$, which is best possible.

math.CO

Common and Sidorenko Linear Equations

A linear equation with coefficients in $\mathbb{F}_q$ is common if the number of monochromatic solutions in any two-coloring of $\mathbb{F}_q^n$ is asymptotically (as $n \to \infty$) at least the number expected in a random two-coloring. The linear equation is Sidorenko if the number of solutions in any dense subset of $\mathbb{F}_q^n$ is asymptotically at least the number expected in a random set of the same density. In this paper, we characterize those linear equations which are common, and those which are Sidorenko. The main novelty is a construction based on choosing random Fourier coefficients that shows that certain linear equations do not have these properties. This solves problems posed in a paper of Saad and Wolf.

math.CO

Sparse graphs with no polynomial-sized anticomplete pairs

A graph is "$H$-free" if it has no induced subgraph isomorphic to $H$. A conjecture of Conlon, Fox and Sudakov states that for every graph $H$, there exists $s>0$ such that in every $H$-free graph with $n>1$ vertices, either some vertex has degree at least $sn$, or there are two disjoint sets of vertices, of sizes at least $sn^s$ and $sn$, anticomplete to each other. We prove this holds for a large class of graphs $H$, and we prove that something like it holds for all graphs $H$. Say $H$ is "almost-bipartite" if $H$ is triangle-free and $V(H)$ can be partitioned into a stable set and a set inducing a graph of maximum degree at most one. We prove that the conjecture above holds for when $H$ is almost-bipartite. We also prove a stronger version where instead of excluding $H$ we restrict the number of copies of $H$. We prove some variations on the conjecture, such as: for every graph $H$, there exists $s >0$ such that in every $H$-free graph with $n>1$ vertices, either some vertex has degree at least $sn$, or there are two disjoint sets $A, B$ of vertices with $|A||B| > s n^{1 + s}$, anticomplete to each other.

math.CO

Anticoncentration for subgraph counts in random graphs

Fix a graph $H$ and some $p\in (0,1)$, and let $X_H$ be the number of copies of $H$ in a random graph $G(n,p)$. Random variables of this form have been intensively studied since the foundational work of Erdős and Rényi. There has been a great deal of progress over the years on the large-scale behaviour of $X_H$, but the more challenging problem of understanding the small-ball probabilities has remained poorly understood until now. More precisely, how likely can it be that $X_H$ falls in some small interval or is equal to some particular value? In this paper we prove the almost-optimal result that if $H$ is connected then for any $x\in \mathbb{N}$ we have $\Pr(X_H=x)\le n^{1-v(H)+o(1)}$. Our proof proceeds by iteratively breaking $X_H$ into different components which fluctuate at "different scales", and relies on a new anticoncentration inequality for random vectors that behave "almost linearly".

math.CO

Combinatorial anti-concentration inequalities, with applications

We prove several different anti-concentration inequalities for functions of independent Bernoulli-distributed random variables. First, motivated by a conjecture of Alon, Hefetz, Krivelevich and Tyomkyn, we prove some "Poisson-type" anti-concentration theorems that give bounds of the form 1/e + o(1) for the point probabilities of certain polynomials. Second, we prove an anti-concentration inequality for polynomials with nonnegative coefficients which extends the classical Erdős-Littlewood-Offord theorem and improves a theorem of Meka, Nguyen and Vu for polynomials of this type. As an application, we prove some new anti-concentration bounds for subgraph counts in random graphs.

math.CO

Sets without $k$-term progressions can have many shorter progressions

Let $f_{s,k}(n)$ be the maximum possible number of $s$-term arithmetic progressions in a sequence $a_1 s \geq 3$, we prove that $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\log f_{s,k}(n)}{\log n} = 2,$$ which answers an old question of Erdős. In fact, we prove upper and lower bounds for $f_{s,k}(n)$ which show that its growth is closely related to the bounds in Szemerédi's theorem.

math.CO

Short proofs of some extremal results III

We prove a selection of results from different areas of extremal combinatorics, including complete or partial solutions to a number of open problems. These results, coming mainly from extremal graph theory and Ramsey theory, have been collected together because in each case the relevant proofs are reasonably short.

math.CO

Ramsey, Paper, Scissors

We introduce a graph Ramsey game called Ramsey, Paper, Scissors. This game has two players, Proposer and Decider. Starting from an empty graph on $n$ vertices, on each turn Proposer proposes a potential edge and Decider simultaneously decides (without knowing Proposer's choice) whether to add it to the graph. Proposer cannot propose an edge which would create a triangle in the graph. The game ends when Proposer has no legal moves remaining, and Proposer wins if the final graph has independence number at least $s$. We prove a threshold phenomenon exists for this game by exhibiting randomized strategies for both players that are optimal up to constants. Namely, there exist constants $0 B\sqrt{n}\log{n}$. This is a factor of $Θ(\sqrt{\log{n}})$ larger than the lower bound coming from the off-diagonal Ramsey number $r(3,s)$.

math.CO

Tower-type bounds for Roth's theorem with popular differences

Green developed an arithmetic regularity lemma to prove a strengthening of Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions in dense sets. It states that for every $ε> 0$ there is some $N_0(ε)$ such that for every $N \ge N_0(ε)$ and $A \subset [N]$ with $|A| = αN$, there is some nonzero $d$ such that $A$ contains at least $(α^3 - ε) N$ three-term arithmetic progressions with common difference $d$. We prove that the minimum $N_0(ε)$ in Green's theorem is an exponential tower of 2s of height on the order of $\log(1/ε)$. Both the lower and upper bounds are new. It shows that the tower-type bounds that arise from the use of a regularity lemma in this application are quantitatively necessary.

math.CO

Extremal and Ramsey results on graph blowups

Recently, Souza introduced blowup Ramsey numbers as a generalization of bipartite Ramsey numbers. For graphs $G$ and $H$, say $G\overset{r}{\longrightarrow} H$ if every $r$-edge-coloring of $G$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. Let $H[t]$ denote the $t$-blowup of $H$. Then the blowup Ramsey number of $G,H,r,$ and $t$ is defined as the minimum $n$ such that $G[n] \overset{r}{\longrightarrow} H[t]$. Souza proved upper and lower bounds on $n$ that are exponential in $t$, and conjectured that the exponential constant does not depend on $G$. We prove that the dependence on $G$ in the exponential constant is indeed unnecessary, but conjecture that some dependence on $G$ is unavoidable. An important step in both Souza's proof and ours is a theorem of Nikiforov, which says that if a graph contains a constant fraction of the possible copies of $H$, then it contains a blowup of $H$ of logarithmic size. We also provide a new proof of this theorem with a better quantitative dependence.

math.CO