arXiv subjects

Jad Salem

Publications and source records attributed to Jad Salem.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

Quantum Hypergraph Partitioning

Quantum optimization algorithms are inherently probabilistic, yet they are most often used to search for a single high-quality solution. In this paper, we instead study hypergraph partitioning problems in which the desired output is itself a probability distribution over partitions. We introduce a distributional perspective on hypergraph partitioning motivated by maximin and minimax objectives such as Fair Cut Cover, and we show how these objectives align naturally with the measurement distribution produced by QAOA. To motivate the formulation, we introduce a workforce-scheduling-inspired toy problem, the Greatest Expected Imbalance problem, in which the goal is to minimize the worst expected imbalance across hyperedges. We then develop QAOA-based quantum solvers that represent distributional solutions natively through quantum states, together with quadratic hypergraph objectives suitable for standard and multi-objective QAOA. These formulations connect balanced hypergraph partitioning, polarized community discovery, and distributional fairness under a unified quantum optimization framework. For comparison, we provide optimal polynomial-time classical approximation algorithms based on semidefinite programming and hyperplane rounding. Experiments on real-world and synthetic hypergraphs demonstrate that low-depth multi-angle QAOA can outperform these classical approximation baselines on the proposed objectives, highlighting the potential of quantum algorithms for optimization problems where the solution is a distribution rather than a single partition.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2026

Learning Cut Distributions with Quantum Optimization

Many combinatorial optimization problems admit a maximin fairness variant, where the aim is to find a distribution over possible solutions which maximizes an expected worst-case outcome. However, the support for an optimal distribution may be exponential, which can be intractable to represent in the worst case. To this end, we propose a quantum based approach to solving distribution optimization problems. Expanding on work analyzing the Dynamical Lie Algebras of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), we show that with a finite number of layers, a QAOA ansatz can be constructed to capture any distribution over bitstrings. We show that the resulting circuit is able to effectively solve the Fair Cut Cover, a fair interpretation of the classical Fractional Cut Cover Problem. In addition, we show that our algorithm is provably better than classical approximations on certain graph structures and empirically outperforms these classical algorithms on tested instances.

quant-ph↗

arXiv2024

Expected Maximin Fairness in Max-Cut and other Combinatorial Optimization Problems

Maximin fairness is the ideal that the worst-off group (or individual) should be treated as well as possible. Literature on maximin fairness in various decision-making settings has grown in recent years, but theoretical results are sparse. In this paper, we explore the challenges inherent to maximin fairness in combinatorial optimization. We begin by showing that (1) optimal maximin-fair solutions are bounded by non-maximin-fair optimal solutions, and (2) stochastic maximin-fair solutions exceed their deterministic counterparts in expectation for a broad class of combinatorial optimization problems. In the remainder of the paper, we use the special case of Max-Cut to demonstrate challenges in defining and implementing maximin fairness.

cs.DS↗

arXiv2022

Don't let Ricci v. DeStefano Hold You Back: A Bias-Aware Legal Solution to the Hiring Paradox

Companies that try to address inequality in employment face a hiring paradox. Failing to address workforce imbalance can result in legal sanctions and scrutiny, but proactive measures to address these issues might result in the same legal conflict. Recent run-ins of Microsoft and Wells Fargo with the Labor Department's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) are not isolated and are likely to persist. To add to the confusion, existing scholarship on Ricci v. DeStefano often deems solutions to this paradox impossible. Circumventive practices such as the 4/5ths rule further illustrate tensions between too little action and too much action. In this work, we give a powerful way to solve this hiring paradox that tracks both legal and algorithmic challenges. We unpack the nuances of Ricci v. DeStefano and extend the legal literature arguing that certain algorithmic approaches to employment are allowed by introducing the legal practice of banding to evaluate candidates. We thus show that a bias-aware technique can be used to diagnose and mitigate "built-in" headwinds in the employment pipeline. We use the machinery of partially ordered sets to handle the presence of uncertainty in evaluations data. This approach allows us to move away from treating "people as numbers" to treating people as individuals -- a property that is sought after by Title VII in the context of employment.

cs.CY↗

arXiv2021

Algorithmic Challenges in Ensuring Fairness at the Time of Decision

Algorithmic decision-making in societal contexts, such as retail pricing, loan administration, recommendations on online platforms, etc., can be framed as stochastic optimization under bandit feedback, which typically requires experimentation with different decisions for the sake of learning. Such experimentation often results in perceptions of unfairness among people impacted by these decisions; for instance, there have been several recent lawsuits accusing companies that deploy algorithmic pricing practices of price gouging. Motivated by the changing legal landscape surrounding algorithmic decision-making, we introduce the well-studied fairness notion of envy-freeness within the context of stochastic convex optimization. Our notion requires that upon receiving decisions in the present time, groups do not envy the decisions received by any of the other groups, both in the present as well as the past. This results in a novel trajectory-constrained stochastic optimization problem that renders existing techniques inapplicable. The main technical contribution of this work is to show problem settings where there is no gap in achievable regret (up to logarithmic factors) when envy-freeness is imposed. In particular, in our main result, we develop a near-optimal envy-free algorithm that achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret for smooth convex functions that satisfy the PL inequality. This algorithm has a coordinate-descent structure, in which we carefully leverage gradient information to ensure monotonic sampling along each dimension, while avoiding overshooting the constrained optimum with high probability. This latter aspect critically uses smoothness and the structure of the envy-freeness constraints, while the PL inequality allows for sufficient progress towards the optimal solution. We discuss several open questions that arise from this analysis, which may be of independent interest.

cs.LG↗