arXiv subjects

Jaisal Patel

Publications and source records attributed to Jaisal Patel.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

AUDITFLOW: Executable Symbolic Environments for Structured Financial Reporting Verification

Structured financial audit verification is difficult for language-model agents because correctness depends on structured evidence rather than text alone. A model must link reported facts to taxonomy concepts, traverse calculation or dimensional relations, and recompute expected values before applying an audit rule. We propose AuditFlow, a graph-grounded multi-agent framework that separates adaptive search from deterministic verification. AuditFlow builds a symbolic environment from a static US-GAAP taxonomy graph and a dynamic XBRL filing graph, and exposes it through typed tools for fact retrieval, taxonomy traversal, numerical checking, and rule evaluation. Two junior auditors inspect each case from regulatory and evidentiary views, while a senior auditor resolves disagreements and can request further investigation. The final reports are fused through evidential aggregation to produce an audit verdict, expected value, evidence trail, and trustworthiness score. On a FinAuditing-derived FinMR sample, AuditFlow reaches 82.09% joint audit accuracy under GPT-5.5, outperforming the strongest baseline by 14.93 points. Removing deterministic checks drops accuracy to 17.91%, showing that the symbolic environment performs the verification step that the model cannot reliably replace.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2026

FinAuditing: A Financial Taxonomy-Structured Multi-Document Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs

Going beyond simple text processing, financial auditing requires detecting semantic, structural, and numerical inconsistencies across large-scale disclosures. As financial reports are filed in XBRL, a structured XML format governed by accounting standards, auditing becomes a structured information extraction and reasoning problem involving concept alignment, taxonomy-defined relations, and cross-document consistency. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise on isolated financial tasks, their capability in professional-grade auditing remains unclear. We introduce FinAuditing, a taxonomy-aligned, structure-aware benchmark built from real XBRL filings. It contains 1,102 annotated instances averaging over 33k tokens and defines three tasks: Financial Semantic Matching (FinSM), Financial Relationship Extraction (FinRE), and Financial Mathematical Reasoning (FinMR). Evaluations of 13 state-of-the-art LLMs reveal substantial gaps in concept retrieval, taxonomy-aware relation modeling, and consistent cross-document reasoning. These findings highlight the need for realistic, structure-aware benchmarks. We release the evaluation code at https://github.com/The-FinAI/FinAuditing and the dataset at https://huggingface.co/collections/TheFinAI/finauditing. The task currently serves as the official benchmark of an ongoing public evaluation contest at https://open-finance-lab.github.io/SecureFinAI_Contest_2026/.

cs.CL↗

arXiv2026

Evaluation and Benchmarking Suite for Financial Large Language Models and Agents

Over the past three years, the financial services industry has witnessed Large Language Models (LLMs) and agents transitioning from the exploration stage to readiness and governance stages. Financial large language models (FinLLMs), such as open FinGPT and proprietary BloombergGPT , have great potential in financial applications, including retrieving real-time data, tutoring, analyzing sentiment of social media, analyzing SEC filings, and agentic trading. However, general-purpose LLMs and agents lack financial expertise and often struggle to handle complex financial reasoning. This paper presents an evaluation and benchmarking suite that covers the lifecycle of FinLLMs and FinAgents. This suite led by SecureFinAI Lab includes an evaluation pipeline and a governance framework collaborating with Linux Foundation and PyTorch Foundation, a FinLLM Leaderboard with HuggingFace, an AgentOps framework with Red Hat, and a documentation website with Rensselear Center of Open Source. Our collaborative development evolves through three stages: FinLLM Exploration (2023), FinLLM Readiness (2024), and FinAI Governance (2025). The proposed suite serves as an open platform that enables researchers and practitioners to perform both quantitative and qualitative analysis of different FinLLMs and FinAgents, fostering a more robust and reliable FinAI ecosystem.

cs.CE↗

arXiv2025

Reasoning Models Ace the CFA Exams

Previous research has reported that large language models (LLMs) demonstrate poor performance on the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) exams. However, recent reasoning models have achieved strong results on graduate-level academic and professional examinations across various disciplines. In this paper, we evaluate state-of-the-art reasoning models on a set of mock CFA exams consisting of 980 questions across three Level I exams, two Level II exams, and three Level III exams. Using the same pass/fail criteria from prior studies, we find that most models clear all three levels. The models that pass, ordered by overall performance, are Gemini 3.0 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-5, Grok 4, Claude Opus 4.1, and DeepSeek-V3.1. Specifically, Gemini 3.0 Pro achieves a record score of 97.6% on Level I. Performance is also strong on Level II, led by GPT-5 at 94.3%. On Level III, Gemini 2.5 Pro attains the highest score with 86.4% on multiple-choice questions while Gemini 3.0 Pro achieves 92.0% on constructed-response questions.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

FinLoRA: Benchmarking LoRA Methods for Fine-Tuning LLMs on Financial Datasets

Low-rank adaptation (LoRA) methods show great potential for scaling pre-trained general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs) to hundreds or thousands of use scenarios. However, their efficacy in high-stakes domains like finance is rarely explored, e.g., passing CFA exams and analyzing SEC filings. In this paper, we present the open-source FinLoRA project that benchmarks LoRA methods on both general and highly professional financial tasks. First, we curated 19 datasets covering diverse financial applications; in particular, we created four novel XBRL analysis datasets based on 150 SEC filings. Second, we evaluated five LoRA methods and five base LLMs. Finally, we provide extensive experimental results in terms of accuracy, F1, and BERTScore and report computational cost in terms of time and GPU memory during fine-tuning and inference stages. We find that LoRA methods achieved substantial performance gains of 36\% on average over base models. Our FinLoRA project provides an affordable and scalable approach to democratize financial intelligence to the general public. Datasets, LoRA adapters, code, and documentation are available at https://github.com/Open-Finance-Lab/FinLoRA

cs.CE↗

arXiv2025

A Report on Financial Regulations Challenge at COLING 2025

Financial large language models (FinLLMs) have been applied to various tasks in business, finance, accounting, and auditing. Complex financial regulations and standards are critical to financial services, which LLMs must comply with. However, FinLLMs' performance in understanding and interpreting financial regulations has rarely been studied. Therefore, we organize the Regulations Challenge, a shared task at COLING 2025. It encourages the academic community to explore the strengths and limitations of popular LLMs. We create 9 novel tasks and corresponding question sets. In this paper, we provide an overview of these tasks and summarize participants' approaches and results. We aim to raise awareness of FinLLMs' professional capability in financial regulations.

cs.CE↗