Jake Van Clief | Searcharxiv

arXiv2026

Interpretable Context Methodology: Folder Structure as Agentic Architecture

Current approaches to AI agent orchestration typically involve building multi-agent frameworks that manage context passing, memory, error handling, and step coordination through code. These frameworks work well for complex, concurrent systems. But for sequential workflows where a human reviews output at each step, they introduce engineering overhead that the problem does not require. This paper presents Model Workspace Protocol (MWP), a method that replaces framework-level orchestration with filesystem structure. Numbered folders represent stages. Plain markdown files carry the prompts and context that tell a single AI agent what role to play at each step. Local scripts handle the mechanical work that does not need AI at all. The result is a system where one agent, reading the right files at the right moment, does the work that would otherwise require a multi-agent framework. This approach applies ideas from Unix pipeline design, modular decomposition, multi-pass compilation, and literate programming to the specific problem of structuring context for AI agents. The protocol is open source under the MIT license.

cs.AI↗

arXiv2025

The Ethics Engine: A Modular Pipeline for Accessible Psychometric Assessment of Large Language Models

As Large Language Models increasingly mediate human communication and decision-making, understanding their value expression becomes critical for research across disciplines. This work presents the Ethics Engine, a modular Python pipeline that transforms psychometric assessment of LLMs from a technically complex endeavor into an accessible research tool. The pipeline demonstrates how thoughtful infrastructure design can expand participation in AI research, enabling investigators across cognitive science, political psychology, education, and other fields to study value expression in language models. Recent adoption by University of Edinburgh researchers studying authoritarianism validates its research utility, processing over 10,000 AI responses across multiple models and contexts. We argue that such tools fundamentally change the landscape of AI research by lowering technical barriers while maintaining scientific rigor. As LLMs increasingly serve as cognitive infrastructure, their embedded values shape millions of daily interactions. Without systematic measurement of these value expressions, we deploy systems whose moral influence remains uncharted. The Ethics Engine enables the rigorous assessment necessary for informed governance of these influential technologies.

cs.CY↗