Searcharxiv⌕ Search

arXiv subjects

James Demmel

Publications and source records attributed to James Demmel.

68 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
arXiv2011

Graph Expansion and Communication Costs of Fast Matrix Multiplication

The communication cost of algorithms (also known as I/O-complexity) is shown to be closely related to the expansion properties of the corresponding computation graphs. We demonstrate this on Strassen's and other fast matrix multiplication algorithms, and obtain first lower bounds on their communication costs. In the sequential case, where the processor has a fast memory of size $M$, too small to store three $n$-by-$n$ matrices, the lower bound on the number of words moved between fast and slow memory is, for many of the matrix multiplication algorithms, $Ω((\frac{n}{\sqrt M})^{ω_0}\cdot M)$, where $ω_0$ is the exponent in the arithmetic count (e.g., $ω_0 = \lg 7$ for Strassen, and $ω_0 = 3$ for conventional matrix multiplication). With $p$ parallel processors, each with fast memory of size $M$, the lower bound is $p$ times smaller. These bounds are attainable both for sequential and for parallel algorithms and hence optimal. These bounds can also be attained by many fast algorithms in linear algebra (e.g., algorithms for LU, QR, and solving the Sylvester equation).

cs.DS↗
arXiv2010

Minimizing Communication for Eigenproblems and the Singular Value Decomposition

Algorithms have two costs: arithmetic and communication. The latter represents the cost of moving data, either between levels of a memory hierarchy, or between processors over a network. Communication often dominates arithmetic and represents a rapidly increasing proportion of the total cost, so we seek algorithms that minimize communication. In \cite{BDHS10} lower bounds were presented on the amount of communication required for essentially all $O(n^3)$-like algorithms for linear algebra, including eigenvalue problems and the SVD. Conventional algorithms, including those currently implemented in (Sca)LAPACK, perform asymptotically more communication than these lower bounds require. In this paper we present parallel and sequential eigenvalue algorithms (for pencils, nonsymmetric matrices, and symmetric matrices) and SVD algorithms that do attain these lower bounds, and analyze their convergence and communication costs.

math.NA↗
arXiv2010

Communication-optimal Parallel and Sequential Cholesky Decomposition

Numerical algorithms have two kinds of costs: arithmetic and communication, by which we mean either moving data between levels of a memory hierarchy (in the sequential case) or over a network connecting processors (in the parallel case). Communication costs often dominate arithmetic costs, so it is of interest to design algorithms minimizing communication. In this paper we first extend known lower bounds on the communication cost (both for bandwidth and for latency) of conventional (O(n^3)) matrix multiplication to Cholesky factorization, which is used for solving dense symmetric positive definite linear systems. Second, we compare the costs of various Cholesky decomposition implementations to these lower bounds and identify the algorithms and data structures that attain them. In the sequential case, we consider both the two-level and hierarchical memory models. Combined with prior results in [13, 14, 15], this gives a set of communication-optimal algorithms for O(n^3) implementations of the three basic factorizations of dense linear algebra: LU with pivoting, QR and Cholesky. But it goes beyond this prior work on sequential LU by optimizing communication for any number of levels of memory hierarchy.

math.NA↗
arXiv2009

Minimizing Communication in Linear Algebra

In 1981 Hong and Kung proved a lower bound on the amount of communication needed to perform dense, matrix-multiplication using the conventional $O(n^3)$ algorithm, where the input matrices were too large to fit in the small, fast memory. In 2004 Irony, Toledo and Tiskin gave a new proof of this result and extended it to the parallel case. In both cases the lower bound may be expressed as $Ω$(#arithmetic operations / $\sqrt{M}$), where M is the size of the fast memory (or local memory in the parallel case). Here we generalize these results to a much wider variety of algorithms, including LU factorization, Cholesky factorization, $LDL^T$ factorization, QR factorization, algorithms for eigenvalues and singular values, i.e., essentially all direct methods of linear algebra. The proof works for dense or sparse matrices, and for sequential or parallel algorithms. In addition to lower bounds on the amount of data moved (bandwidth) we get lower bounds on the number of messages required to move it (latency). We illustrate how to extend our lower bound technique to compositions of linear algebra operations (like computing powers of a matrix), to decide whether it is enough to call a sequence of simpler optimal algorithms (like matrix multiplication) to minimize communication, or if we can do better. We give examples of both. We also show how to extend our lower bounds to certain graph theoretic problems. We point out recently designed algorithms for dense LU, Cholesky, QR, eigenvalue and the SVD problems that attain these lower bounds; implementations of LU and QR show large speedups over conventional linear algebra algorithms in standard libraries like LAPACK and ScaLAPACK. Many open problems remain.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2008

Implementing Communication-Optimal Parallel and Sequential QR Factorizations

We present parallel and sequential dense QR factorization algorithms for tall and skinny matrices and general rectangular matrices that both minimize communication, and are as stable as Householder QR. The sequential and parallel algorithms for tall and skinny matrices lead to significant speedups in practice over some of the existing algorithms, including LAPACK and ScaLAPACK, for example up to 6.7x over ScaLAPACK. The parallel algorithm for general rectangular matrices is estimated to show significant speedups over ScaLAPACK, up to 22x over ScaLAPACK.

math.NA↗
arXiv2008

Communication-optimal parallel and sequential QR and LU factorizations: theory and practice

We present parallel and sequential dense QR factorization algorithms that are both optimal (up to polylogarithmic factors) in the amount of communication they perform, and just as stable as Householder QR. Our first algorithm, Tall Skinny QR (TSQR), factors m-by-n matrices in a one-dimensional (1-D) block cyclic row layout, and is optimized for m >> n. Our second algorithm, CAQR (Communication-Avoiding QR), factors general rectangular matrices distributed in a two-dimensional block cyclic layout. It invokes TSQR for each block column factorization.

math.NA↗
arXiv2008

Communication-optimal parallel and sequential QR and LU factorizations

We present parallel and sequential dense QR factorization algorithms that are both optimal (up to polylogarithmic factors) in the amount of communication they perform, and just as stable as Householder QR. We prove optimality by extending known lower bounds on communication bandwidth for sequential and parallel matrix multiplication to provide latency lower bounds, and show these bounds apply to the LU and QR decompositions. We not only show that our QR algorithms attain these lower bounds (up to polylogarithmic factors), but that existing LAPACK and ScaLAPACK algorithms perform asymptotically more communication. We also point out recent LU algorithms in the literature that attain at least some of these lower bounds.

math.NA↗
arXiv2007

Accurate and Efficient Expression Evaluation and Linear Algebra

We survey and unify recent results on the existence of accurate algorithms for evaluating multivariate polynomials, and more generally for accurate numerical linear algebra with structured matrices. By "accurate" we mean that the computed answer has relative error less than 1, i.e., has some correct leading digits. We also address efficiency, by which we mean algorithms that run in polynomial time in the size of the input. Our results will depend strongly on the model of arithmetic: Most of our results will use the so-called Traditional Model (TM). We give a set of necessary and sufficient conditions to decide whether a high accuracy algorithm exists in the TM, and describe progress toward a decision procedure that will take any problem and provide either a high accuracy algorithm or a proof that none exists. When no accurate algorithm exists in the TM, it is natural to extend the set of available accurate operations by a library of additional operations, such as $x+y+z$, dot products, or indeed any enumerable set which could then be used to build further accurate algorithms. We show how our accurate algorithms and decision procedure for finding them extend to this case. Finally, we address other models of arithmetic, and the relationship between (im)possibility in the TM and (in)efficient algorithms operating on numbers represented as bit strings.

math.NA↗
arXiv2007

Sparse SOS Relaxations for Minimizing Functions that are Summations of Small Polynomials

This paper discusses how to find the global minimum of functions that are summations of small polynomials (``small'' means involving a small number of variables). Some sparse sum of squares (SOS) techniques are proposed. We compare their computational complexity and lower bounds with prior SOS relaxations. Under certain conditions, we also discuss how to extract the global minimizers from these sparse relaxations. The proposed methods are especially useful in solving sparse polynomial system and nonlinear least squares problems. Numerical experiments are presented, which show that the proposed methods significantly improve the computational performance of prior methods for solving these problems. Lastly, we present applications of this sparsity technique in solving polynomial systems derived from nonlinear differential equations and sensor network localization.

math.OC↗
arXiv2007

Fast linear algebra is stable

In an earlier paper, we showed that a large class of fast recursive matrix multiplication algorithms is stable in a normwise sense, and that in fact if multiplication of $n$-by-$n$ matrices can be done by any algorithm in $O(n^{ω+ η})$ operations for any $η> 0$, then it can be done stably in $O(n^{ω+ η})$ operations for any $η> 0$. Here we extend this result to show that essentially all standard linear algebra operations, including LU decomposition, QR decomposition, linear equation solving, matrix inversion, solving least squares problems, (generalized) eigenvalue problems and the singular value decomposition can also be done stably (in a normwise sense) in $O(n^{ω+ η})$ operations.

math.NA↗
arXiv2006

Fast matrix multiplication is stable

We perform forward error analysis for a large class of recursive matrix multiplication algorithms in the spirit of [D. Bini and G. Lotti, Stability of fast algorithms for matrix multiplication, Numer. Math. 36 (1980), 63--72]. As a consequence of our analysis, we show that the exponent of matrix multiplication (the optimal running time) can be achieved by numerically stable algorithms. We also show that new group-theoretic algorithms proposed in [H. Cohn, and C. Umans, A group-theoretic approach to fast matrix multiplication, FOCS 2003, 438--449] and [H. Cohn, R. Kleinberg, B. Szegedy and C. Umans, Group-theoretic algorithms for matrix multiplication, FOCS 2005, 379--388] are all included in the class of algorithms to which our analysis applies, and are therefore numerically stable. We perform detailed error analysis for three specific fast group-theoretic algorithms.

math.NA↗
arXiv2006

Toward accurate polynomial evaluation in rounded arithmetic

Given a multivariate real (or complex) polynomial $p$ and a domain $\cal D$, we would like to decide whether an algorithm exists to evaluate $p(x)$ accurately for all $x \in {\cal D}$ using rounded real (or complex) arithmetic. Here ``accurately'' means with relative error less than 1, i.e., with some correct leading digits. The answer depends on the model of rounded arithmetic: We assume that for any arithmetic operator $op(a,b)$, for example $a+b$ or $a \cdot b$, its computed value is $op(a,b) \cdot (1 + δ)$, where $| δ|$ is bounded by some constant $ε$ where $0 < ε\ll 1$, but $δ$ is otherwise arbitrary. This model is the traditional one used to analyze the accuracy of floating point algorithms.Our ultimate goal is to establish a decision procedure that, for any $p$ and $\cal D$, either exhibits an accurate algorithm or proves that none exists. In contrast to the case where numbers are stored and manipulated as finite bit strings (e.g., as floating point numbers or rational numbers) we show that some polynomials $p$ are impossible to evaluate accurately. The existence of an accurate algorithm will depend not just on $p$ and $\cal D$, but on which arithmetic operators and which constants are are available and whether branching is permitted. Toward this goal, we present necessary conditions on $p$ for it to be accurately evaluable on open real or complex domains ${\cal D}$. We also give sufficient conditions, and describe progress toward a complete decision procedure. We do present a complete decision procedure for homogeneous polynomials $p$ with integer coefficients, ${\cal D} = \C^n$, and using only the arithmetic operations $+$, $-$ and $\cdot$.

math.NA↗
arXiv2003

The complexity of accurate floating point computation

Our goal is to find accurate and efficient algorithms, when they exist, for evaluating rational expressions containing floating point numbers, and for computing matrix factorizations (like LU and the SVD) of matrices with rational expressions as entries. More precisely, {\em accuracy} means the relative error in the output must be less than one (no matter how tiny the output is), and {\em efficiency} means that the algorithm runs in polynomial time. Our goal is challenging because our accuracy demand is much stricter than usual.

math.NA↗