arXiv subjects

James E. Allchin

Publications and source records attributed to James E. Allchin.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

arXiv2026

When Does Reward Teach State? A Hidden-Automaton Instrument and a Group-Language Warning Signal

Does a reinforcement-learning agent that earns reward learn its task's hidden state? We study this question with hidden finite automata that the agent partially controls. Because each automaton is known, we can normalize reward by the best achievable return and probe the network for the true state at every step. Together the two measurements separate failures that reward alone conflates. An agent can encode too little of a state its network could hold, or encode the state and still control poorly. Weak on-policy RL matches random play while the state probe stays at chance. State learning depends on the optimizer, the training budget, and the task's structure. Permutation automata provide a warning before training: no input symbol maps two distinct states to the same successor. On a stratified held-out set, 86 of 103 permutation automata fail the state probe, and the classification is stable across probe read-outs and recovery thresholds. Most of these failures come with weak reward. High reward without the state occurs but is rare. Non-permutation automata can also fail. Oracle-normalized reward alone therefore does not establish that the task's state was learned.

cs.LG↗

arXiv2026

Learning What Matters: Supervising Global Context Pruning with Causal Evidence Sets

Pruning a long context means committing to the blocks a model will keep, and the usual selector is distilled from a dense teacher's attention. That assumes attention shows which context the answer depends on. We test the assumption on retrieval tasks where the evidence is known exactly, by masking context and measuring whether the answer changes. Attention and causal dependence disagree. Teachers attend to outdated facts that the answer does not depend on, and they attend differently across training runs that use the same evidence. Selectors trained on that attention copy both failures. On a multi-hop retrieval task, a selector distilled from attention routes at 36% to 98% depending on the training run. The same selector trained on causal evidence sets reaches 99% or better on every run. Dense accuracy does not tell the teachers apart. Masking the frozen teacher recovers the causal sets of these tasks without annotations. Frozen pretrained models show the same conflict, and selectors supervised with known evidence labels beat attention-based eviction through 32B when context must be pruned before the question arrives.

cs.LG↗