SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

James Traina

Publications and source records attributed to James Traina.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Micro and Macro Perspectives on Production-Based Markups

We review the "production approach" to estimating markups, the ratio of price to marginal cost. The approach is uniquely scalable: it requires no model of consumer demand or market structure and applies broadly across firms, industries, and time. Our organizing insight is that the production-based markup is a residual. Like the Solow residual, it is clean in theory but potentially contaminated by misspecification and mismeasurement. This framing helps explain why small differences in implementation can produce starkly different results from the same data. In some cases, markups have risen sharply. In others, they have not. Despite the disagreements in the literature, the importance of understanding and measuring market power cannot be overstated. We provide conceptual rationales for this disagreement, offer practical guidance on data and estimation, and call for greater transparency about how much of the variation attributed to markups may instead reflect technology.

econ.GN

The Beginning of the Trend: Interest Rates, Profits, and Markups

Recent highly cited research uses time-series evidence to argue the decline in interest rates led to a large rise in economic profits and markups. We show the size of these estimates is sensitive to the sample start date: The rise in markups from 1984 to 2019 is 14% larger than from 1980 to 2019, a difference amounting to a $3000 change in income per worker in 2019. The sensitivity comes from a peak in interest rates in 1984, during a period of heightened volatility. Our results imply researchers should justify their time-series selection and incorporate sensitivity checks in their analysis.

econ.GN

Profit Puzzles or: Public Firm Profits Have Fallen

We show that public firm profit rates fell by half since 1980. Inferred as the residual from the rise of US corporate profit rates in aggregate data, private firm profit rates doubled since 1980. Public firm financial returns matched their fall in profit rates, while public firm representativeness increased from 30% to 60% of the US capital stock. These results imply that time-varying selection biases in extrapolating public firms to the aggregate economy can be severe.

econ.GN