SearcharxivSearch

arXiv subjects

Jamico Schade

Publications and source records attributed to Jamico Schade.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Complexity of Firefighting on Graphs

We consider a pursuit-evasion game that describes the process of extinguishing a fire burning on the nodes of an undirected graph. We denote the minimum number of firefighters required by ffn(G) and provide almost sharp bounds to this graph parameter for complete binary trees. We show that deciding whether ffn(G) <= m for given G and m is NP-hard. Furthermore, we show that shortest strategies can have superpolynomial length, leaving open whether the problem is in NP. We provide a construction that allows for transferring these results to a well-established Cops and Robbers variant called the "Hunter and Rabbit game".

cs.CC

Lower Bounds on the Complexity of Mixed-Integer Programs for Stable Set and Knapsack

Standard mixed-integer programming formulations for the stable set problem on $n$-node graphs require $n$ integer variables. We prove that this is almost optimal: We give a family of $n$-node graphs for which every polynomial-size MIP formulation requires $\Omega(n/\log^2 n)$ integer variables. By a polyhedral reduction we obtain an analogous result for $n$-item knapsack problems. In both cases, this improves the previously known bounds of $\Omega(\sqrt{n}/\log n)$ by Cevallos, Weltge & Zenklusen (SODA 2018). To this end, we show that there exists a family of $n$-node graphs whose stable set polytopes satisfy the following: any $(1+\varepsilon/n)$-approximate extended formulation for these polytopes, for some constant $\varepsilon > 0$, has size $2^{\Omega(n/\log n)}$. Our proof extends and simplifies the information-theoretic methods due to G\"o\"os, Jain & Watson (FOCS 2016, SIAM J. Comput. 2018) who showed the same result for the case of exact extended formulations (i.e. $\varepsilon = 0$).

cs.DM

Lattice-free simplices with lattice width $2d - o(d)$

The Flatness theorem states that the maximum lattice width ${\rm Flt}(d)$ of a $d$-dimensional lattice-free convex set is finite. It is the key ingredient for Lenstra's algorithm for integer programming in fixed dimension, and much work has been done to obtain bounds on ${\rm Flt}(d)$. While most results have been concerned with upper bounds, only few techniques are known to obtain lower bounds. In fact, the previously best known lower bound ${\rm Flt}(d) \ge 1.138d$ arises from direct sums of a $3$-dimensional lattice-free simplex. In this work, we establish the lower bound ${\rm Flt}(d) \ge 2d - O(\sqrt{d})$, attained by a family of lattice-free simplices. Our construction is based on a differential equation that naturally appears in this context. Additionally, we provide the first local maximizers of the lattice width of $4$- and $5$-dimensional lattice-free convex bodies.

math.CO