arXiv subjects

Jan Oliver Ringert

Publications and source records attributed to Jan Oliver Ringert.

30 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

arXiv2014

Modal Object Diagrams

While object diagrams (ODs) are widely used as a means to document object-oriented systems, they are expressively weak, as they are limited to describe specific possible snapshots of the system at hand. In this paper we introduce modal object diagrams (MODs), which extend the classical OD language with positive/negative and example/invariant modalities. The extended language allows the designer to specify not only positive example models but also negative examples, ones that the system should not allow, positive invariants, ones that all system's snapshots should include, and negative invariants, ones that no system snapshot is allowed to include. Moreover, as a primary application of the extended language we provide a formal verification technique that decides whether a given class diagram satisfies (i.e., models) a multi-modal object diagrams specification. In case of a negative answer, the technique outputs relevant counterexample object models, as applicable. The verification is based on a reduction to Alloy. The ideas are implemented in a prototype Eclipse plug-in. Examples show the usefulness of the extended language in specifying structural requirements of object-oriented systems in an intuitive yet expressive way.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

CDDiff: Semantic Differencing for Class Diagrams

Class diagrams (CDs), which specify classes and the relationships between them, are widely used for modeling the structure of object-oriented systems. As models, programs, and systems evolve over time, during the development lifecycle and beyond it, effective change management is a major challenge in software development, which has attracted much research efforts in recent years. In this paper we present cddiff, a semantic diff operator for CDs. Unlike most existing approaches to model comparison, which compare the concrete or the abstract syntax of two given diagrams and output a list of syntactical changes or edit operations, cddiff considers the semantics of the diagrams at hand and outputs a set of diff witnesses, each of which is an object model that is possible in the first CD and is not possible in the second. We motivate the use of cddiff, formally define it, and show how it is computed. The computation is based on a reduction to Alloy. The work is implemented in a prototype Eclipse plug-in. Examples show the unique contribution of our approach to the state-of-the-art in version comparison and evolution analysis.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

An Operational Semantics for Activity Diagrams using SMV

This document defines an operational semantics for activity diagrams (ADs) using a translation to SMV. The translation is inspired by the work of Eshuis [Esh06] and extends it with support for data. Each execution step of the SMV module obtained from an AD represents an executed action of this AD with interleaved execution of concurrent branches. An implementation of the given translation was used in the context of semantic differencing for ADs [MRR11]. We define the translation and give two examples, showing ADs and their complete representation in SMV.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

Towards Architectural Programming of Embedded Systems

Integrating architectural elements with a modern programming language is essential to ensure a smooth combination of architectural design and programming. In this position statement, we motivate a combination of architectural description for distributed, asynchronously communicating systems and Java as an example for such an integration. The result is an ordinary programming language, that exhibits architecture, data structure and behavior within one view. Mappings or tracing between different views is unnecessary. A prototypical implementation of a compiler demonstrates the possibilities and challenges of architectural programming.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

Black-box Integration of Heterogeneous Modeling Languages for Cyber-Physical Systems

Robots belong to a class of Cyber-Physical Systems where complex software as a mobile device has to full tasks in a complex environment. Modeling robotics applications for analysis and code generation requires modeling languages for the logical software architecture and the system behavior. The MontiArcAutomaton modeling framework integrates six independently developed modeling languages to model robotics applications: a component & connector architecture description language, automata, I/O tables, class diagrams, OCL, and a Java DSL. We describe how we integrated these languages into MontiArcAutomaton a-posteriori in a black-box integration fashion.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

A Manifesto for Semantic Model Differencing

Models are heavily used in software engineering and together with their systems they evolve over time. Thus, managing their changes is an important challenge for system maintainability. Existing approaches to model differencing concentrate on heuristics matching between model elements and on finding and presenting differences at a concrete or abstract syntactic level. While showing some success, these approaches are inherently limited to comparing syntactic structures. This paper is a manifesto for research on semantic model differencing. We present our vision to develop semantic diff operators for model comparisons: operators whose input consists of two models and whose output is a set of diff witnesses, instances of one model that are not instances of the other. In particular, if the models are syntactically different but there are no diff witnesses, the models are semantically equivalent. We demonstrate our vision using two concrete diff operators, for class diagrams and for activity diagrams. We motivate the use of semantic diff operators, brie y discuss the algorithms to compute them, list related challenges, and show their application and potential use as new fundamental building blocks for change management in model-driven engineering.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

An Interim Summary on Semantic Model Differencing

This position paper provides an interim summary on the goals and current state of our ongoing research project on semantic model differencing for software evolution. We describe the basics of semantic model differencing, give two examples from our recent work, and discuss future challenges in taking full advantage of the potential of semantic differencing techniques in the context of models' evolution.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

A Requirements Modeling Language for the Component Behavior of Cyber Physical Robotics Systems

Software development for robotics applications is a sophisticated endeavor as robots are inherently complex. Explicit modeling of the architecture and behavior of robotics application yields many advantages to cope with this complexity by identifying and separating logically and physically independent components and by hierarchically structuring the system under development. On top of component and connector models we propose modeling the requirements on the behavior of robotics software components using I/O! automata. This approach facilitates early simulation of requirements model, allows to subject these to formal analysis and to generate the software from them. In this paper, we introduce an extension of the architecture description language MontiArc to model the requirements on components with I/O!automata, which are defined in the spirit of Martin Glinz Statecharts for requirements modeling [10]. We furthermore present a case study based on a robotics application generated for the Lego NXT robotic platform.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

From Software Architecture Structure and Behavior Modeling to Implementations of Cyber-Physical Systems

Software development for Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) is a sophisticated activity as these systems are inherently complex. The engineering of CPS requires composition and interaction of diverse distributed software modules. Describing both, a systems architecture and behavior in integrated models, yields many advantages to cope with this complexity: the models are platform independent, can be decomposed to be developed independently by experts of the respective fields, are highly reusable and may be subjected to formal analysis. In this paper, we introduce a code generation framework for the MontiArcAutomaton modeling language. CPS are modeled as Component & Connector architectures with embedded I/O! automata. During development, these models can be analyzed using formal methods, graphically edited, and deployed to various platforms. For this, we present four code generators based on the MontiCore code generation framework, that implement the transformation from MontiArcAutomaton models to Mona (formal analysis), EMF Ecore (graphical editing), and Java and Python (deployment. Based on these prototypes, we discuss their commonalities and differences as well as language and application specific challenges focusing on code generator development.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

A Case Study on Model-Based Development of Robotic Systems using MontiArc with Embedded Automata

Software development for service robotics is inherently complex. Even a single robot requires the composition of several sensors, actuators, and software modules. The systems are usually developed by groups of domain experts, rarely software engineering experts. Thus the resulting software systems are monolithic programs solving a single problem on a single platform. We claim modeling of both structure and behavior of robots in a modular way leads to better reusable software. We report on a study about the modeling of robotics software with the structure and behavior modeling language MontiArcAutomaton. This study assesses the benefits and difficulties of model-based robotics software development using MontiArc-Automaton. Our findings are based on a survey, discussions with the participants, and key figures from their development behavior. We present the project, our study, lessons learned, and future work based on the insights gained

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

Synthesis of Component and Connector Models from Crosscutting Structural Views

We present component and connector (C&C) views, which specify structural properties of component and connector models in an expressive and intuitive way. C&C views provide means to abstract away direct hierarchy, direct connectivity, port names and types, and thus can crosscut the traditional boundaries of the implementation-oriented hierarchical decomposition of systems and sub-systems, and reflect the partial knowledge available to different stakeholders involved in a system's design. As a primary application for C&C views we investigate the synthesis problem: given a C&C views specification, consisting of mandatory, alternative, and negative views, construct a concrete satisfying C&C model, if one exists. We show that the problem is NP-hard and solve it, in a bounded scope, using a reduction to SAT, via Alloy. We further extend the basic problem with support for library components, specification patterns, and architectural styles. The result of synthesis can be used for further exploration, simulation, and refinement of the C&C model or, as the complete, final model itself, for direct code generation. A prototype tool and an evaluation over four example systems with multiple specifications show promising results and suggest interesting future research directions towards a comprehensive development environment for the structure of component and connector designs.

cs.SE↗

arXiv2014

Verifying Component and Connector Models against Crosscutting Structural Views

The structure of component and connector (C&C) models, which are used in many application domains of software engineering, consists of components at different containment levels, their typed input and output ports, and the connectors between them. C&C views, presented in [24], can be used to specify structural properties of C&C models in an expressive and intuitive way. In this work we address the verification of a C&C model against a C&C view and present efficient (polynomial) algorithms to decide satisfaction. A unique feature of our work, not present in existing approaches to checking structural properties of C&C models, is the generation of witnesses for satisfaction/non-satisfaction and of short naturallanguage texts, which serve to explain and formally justify the verification results and point the engineer to its causes. A prototype tool and an evaluation over four example systems with multiple views, performance and scalability experiments, as well as a user study of the usefulness of the witnesses for engineers, demonstrate the contribution of our work to the state-of-the-art in component and connector modeling and analysis.

cs.SE↗